IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67
#1475
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,104
Likes: 791
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
#1476
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 589
Likes: 169
Usually the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. It is like someone claiming the sky is green, gets called on it, but just tells us to do our own research and they aren't going to provide the proof of their claim and believes it is actually us needing to provide the proof.
#1477
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,104
Likes: 791
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
But same time, if LEPF is going to scream 67 is safe, then it is on them to show the proof.
Usually the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. It is like someone claiming the sky is green, gets called on it, but just tells us to do our own research and they aren't going to provide the proof of their claim and believes it is actually us needing to provide the proof.
Usually the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. It is like someone claiming the sky is green, gets called on it, but just tells us to do our own research and they aren't going to provide the proof of their claim and believes it is actually us needing to provide the proof.
But in the case of government imposing itself on freedoms (especially constitutional freedoms) the burden is on .gov. You can of course debate what constitutes adequate proof in this case, but I know it's not union political influence.
#1478
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 212
But same time, if LEPF is going to scream 67 is safe, then it is on them to show the proof.
Usually the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. It is like someone claiming the sky is green, gets called on it, but just tells us to do our own research and they aren't going to provide the proof of their claim and believes it is actually us needing to provide the proof.
Usually the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. It is like someone claiming the sky is green, gets called on it, but just tells us to do our own research and they aren't going to provide the proof of their claim and believes it is actually us needing to provide the proof.
#1479
Originally Posted by rickair7777
But in the case of government imposing itself on freedoms (especially constitutional freedoms) the burden is on .gov.
Claiming a constitutional right to fly for an air carrier indefinitely is a wee bit of a stretch...
Last edited by BoilerUP; 10-29-2025 at 09:52 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



