IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67
#762
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2025
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Let Experienced Pilots Fly
NOTAM #18 - CLARIFICATION
“RETROACTIVITY”
September 19, 2025
This update is a response to your questions about the new Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act 2025. Specifically, the use of the word “retroactivity.”
The Bill Language
Retroactivity vs Eligibility
Return to Service
The long-awaited bill reintroduced today by Congressman Nehls says on line 23, “RETROACTIVITY.—A pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill may return to service in multicrew covered operations until 67 years of age.”
Please know in the context of the bill, the word “retroactivity” is being used to mean “eligibility.” In other words, a pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill is “eligible” to return to service.
The phrase “return to service” in the bill means a pilot is eligible to be employed by any part 121 carrier. Congress cannot legislate the hiring or seniority of airline pilots.
Thank you for your questions and the opportunity to clarify the language in the House bill. Please continue to reach out if you have any further questions.
Experience Matters!
LEPF
NOTAM #18 - CLARIFICATION
“RETROACTIVITY”
September 19, 2025
This update is a response to your questions about the new Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act 2025. Specifically, the use of the word “retroactivity.”
The Bill Language
Retroactivity vs Eligibility
Return to Service
The long-awaited bill reintroduced today by Congressman Nehls says on line 23, “RETROACTIVITY.—A pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill may return to service in multicrew covered operations until 67 years of age.”
Please know in the context of the bill, the word “retroactivity” is being used to mean “eligibility.” In other words, a pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill is “eligible” to return to service.
The phrase “return to service” in the bill means a pilot is eligible to be employed by any part 121 carrier. Congress cannot legislate the hiring or seniority of airline pilots.
Thank you for your questions and the opportunity to clarify the language in the House bill. Please continue to reach out if you have any further questions.
Experience Matters!
LEPF
#764
Let Experienced Pilots Fly
NOTAM #18 - CLARIFICATION
“RETROACTIVITY”
September 19, 2025
This update is a response to your questions about the new Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act 2025. Specifically, the use of the word “retroactivity.”
The Bill Language
Retroactivity vs Eligibility
Return to Service
The long-awaited bill reintroduced today by Congressman Nehls says on line 23, “RETROACTIVITY.—A pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill may return to service in multicrew covered operations until 67 years of age.”
Please know in the context of the bill, the word “retroactivity” is being used to mean “eligibility.” In other words, a pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill is “eligible” to return to service.
The phrase “return to service” in the bill means a pilot is eligible to be employed by any part 121 carrier. Congress cannot legislate the hiring or seniority of airline pilots.
Thank you for your questions and the opportunity to clarify the language in the House bill. Please continue to reach out if you have any further questions.
Experience Matters!
LEPF
NOTAM #18 - CLARIFICATION
“RETROACTIVITY”
September 19, 2025
This update is a response to your questions about the new Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act 2025. Specifically, the use of the word “retroactivity.”
The Bill Language
Retroactivity vs Eligibility
Return to Service
The long-awaited bill reintroduced today by Congressman Nehls says on line 23, “RETROACTIVITY.—A pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill may return to service in multicrew covered operations until 67 years of age.”
Please know in the context of the bill, the word “retroactivity” is being used to mean “eligibility.” In other words, a pilot who is over 65 years of age on the date of enactment of this bill is “eligible” to return to service.
The phrase “return to service” in the bill means a pilot is eligible to be employed by any part 121 carrier. Congress cannot legislate the hiring or seniority of airline pilots.
Thank you for your questions and the opportunity to clarify the language in the House bill. Please continue to reach out if you have any further questions.
Experience Matters!
LEPF
But send money! We're not going to open our books, or let you know where your money is going...but send MORE!
#765
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,107
Likes: 793
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
#766
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 102
From: Whale FO
Can't wait to see all those bright happy smiles of the 66 year old previously retired WB CAs filling the seats of a Regional indoc class!
LEPF guys clearly haven't even read the WP349 fully. It has a long list of key issues to solve before the age can be increased.
"request that ICAO establish standardised medical risk assessment and oversight systems informed by a standard set of pilot medical data to reliably assess the medical risks associated with pilot age;"
"a system of standardised data collection about the medical status and health-related performance across all pilot age groups. This data should as a minimum include the incidence of medical conditions in license-holders, medical reasons for retirement from CAT operations, reasons for voluntary non-renewal of medical certificate or loss of medical certificates through regulatory action, and inflight safety and performance data (for all events);"
"identification of locally appropriate medical screening strategies to safeguard future health and performance, including early identification of medical conditions that require further assessment to ensure the risk of incapacity in individual and the system remains acceptable;"
In effect, they need to rewrite a lot of the medical standards.
This process will take years.
LEPF guys clearly haven't even read the WP349 fully. It has a long list of key issues to solve before the age can be increased.
"request that ICAO establish standardised medical risk assessment and oversight systems informed by a standard set of pilot medical data to reliably assess the medical risks associated with pilot age;"
"a system of standardised data collection about the medical status and health-related performance across all pilot age groups. This data should as a minimum include the incidence of medical conditions in license-holders, medical reasons for retirement from CAT operations, reasons for voluntary non-renewal of medical certificate or loss of medical certificates through regulatory action, and inflight safety and performance data (for all events);"
"identification of locally appropriate medical screening strategies to safeguard future health and performance, including early identification of medical conditions that require further assessment to ensure the risk of incapacity in individual and the system remains acceptable;"
In effect, they need to rewrite a lot of the medical standards.
This process will take years.
#767
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 148
Can't wait to see all those bright happy smiles of the 66 year old previously retired WB CAs filling the seats of a Regional indoc class!
LEPF guys clearly haven't even read the WP349 fully. It has a long list of key issues to solve before the age can be increased.
"request that ICAO establish standardised medical risk assessment and oversight systems informed by a standard set of pilot medical data to reliably assess the medical risks associated with pilot age;"
"a system of standardised data collection about the medical status and health-related performance across all pilot age groups. This data should as a minimum include the incidence of medical conditions in license-holders, medical reasons for retirement from CAT operations, reasons for voluntary non-renewal of medical certificate or loss of medical certificates through regulatory action, and inflight safety and performance data (for all events);"
"identification of locally appropriate medical screening strategies to safeguard future health and performance, including early identification of medical conditions that require further assessment to ensure the risk of incapacity in individual and the system remains acceptable;"
In effect, they need to rewrite a lot of the medical standards.
This process will take years.
LEPF guys clearly haven't even read the WP349 fully. It has a long list of key issues to solve before the age can be increased.
"request that ICAO establish standardised medical risk assessment and oversight systems informed by a standard set of pilot medical data to reliably assess the medical risks associated with pilot age;"
"a system of standardised data collection about the medical status and health-related performance across all pilot age groups. This data should as a minimum include the incidence of medical conditions in license-holders, medical reasons for retirement from CAT operations, reasons for voluntary non-renewal of medical certificate or loss of medical certificates through regulatory action, and inflight safety and performance data (for all events);"
"identification of locally appropriate medical screening strategies to safeguard future health and performance, including early identification of medical conditions that require further assessment to ensure the risk of incapacity in individual and the system remains acceptable;"
In effect, they need to rewrite a lot of the medical standards.
This process will take years.
Nobody will ever know because their books are closed.
The entire premise is “Donate now for the cause because we are so close. It could happen any day now!” In reality, most of them will “get fired” at 65. I doubt many would open the pocket books if a realistic timeline was set.
I’ve got my money on it increasing relatively close to the 65th birthday of a certain congressman’s brother. If it goes past that date, I am sure ol’ Troy will lose some interest.
#768
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,430
Likes: 124
From: Window seat
#769
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 148
Those glasses quickly lose the rose color when reality sets in and all those negative things you were tired of show back up.
Add in being right seat to someone, who in your mind, should be junior to you, isn’t as qualified as you, and is probably one of those entitled millenials or possibly even Gen Z.
I don’t think it will be an overwhelming number.
#770
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 399
Likes: 49
This is in United’s CBA and I am willing to bet most other airlines have the same:
“A Pilot whose name is removed from the Seniority List as set forth in Section 6 shall forfeit all previously accrued longevity”
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



