Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Economic Impacts of Iran War >

Economic Impacts of Iran War


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Economic Impacts of Iran War

Old Yesterday | 11:32 AM
  #1831  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
Just for clarity, the US has an incredible, nearly inexhaustible supply of PGMs. I think you are referring to specific more exquisite weapons that weren’t in large quantities to start, but JDAMs are aplenty, not that you need everything to be that level of precision for acceptable CDE.
Yes.

The exquisite munitions are for kicking the door in, cleaning up enemy IADS, and getting after high value, mobile targets whose location will likely become harder to pin down after hostilities commence.

Once air superiority (air supremacy in this case) is achieved, then the ATO basically starts to function like an airline operations schedule, with reusable planes and drones servicing predefined targets with cheap iron bombs (typically with cheap guidance kits), returning to refuel, re-arm, line mx, maybe change crews, and go again. That's sustainable for a *very* long time.

We have vast stockpiles of iron bombs and various bolt-on guidance kits, all very affordable as such things go. We even still have the ability to deploy unguided iron bombs the old fashioned way (I'll let current fighter attack guys weigh in on the current level of proficiency).

We really no longer need the expensive munitions for this conflict, except maybe for an occasional niche application.

The legit concern is that we expended a lot of the high-end stuff, which reduces deterrence in the Pacific until inventories are restored (which will take time due to limited production capacity, even if funded). But the flip side is that we demonstrated to PRC that our chit still works really well, that in and of itself has a deterrent effect. Also demonstrated that the current regime at least isn't afraid of engaging, additional deterrent effect.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 11:37 AM
  #1832  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,193
Likes: 254
Default

https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-...3d2f?st=M2QVXC

Things about to get spicy on the West Coast
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:16 PM
  #1833  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 45
Default

Originally Posted by Name User

The SPR drawdown will end in July.

Would have helped if an administration hadn't drawn down the SPR going into an election in an attempt to "buy" votes.

There was a way to do this - had the US moved years ago to reduce demand on oil products (ie more EVs like China is doing) this war was doable. The issue is, just like always, the US government operates in knee-jerk mode and does little long term planning (again, like China).

Another way to do this would have been not to go to "war" with the fossil fuel industry .......it seems California policy led to a uniquely disadvantaged position.


.
From the article...."...And it doesn’t help that two of the state’s major refineries closed in the past six months, cutting off almost one-fifth of its fuel-making capacity. Even if the strait reopens soon, its closure has already withheld at least 1 billion barrels from the global market, analysts say. ...

and...

"We are doing everything we can to meet our supply obligations there,” Wirth said. “But it does point out the vulnerabilities that have been created in California as a result of decades of poor energy policy.”

Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:17 PM
  #1834  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes.

The exquisite munitions are for kicking the door in, cleaning up enemy IADS, and getting after high value, mobile targets whose location will likely become harder to pin down after hostilities commence.

Once air superiority (air supremacy in this case) is achieved, then the ATO basically starts to function like an airline operations schedule, with reusable planes and drones servicing predefined targets with cheap iron bombs (typically with cheap guidance kits), returning to refuel, re-arm, line mx, maybe change crews, and go again. That's sustainable for a *very* long time.

We have vast stockpiles of iron bombs and various bolt-on guidance kits, all very affordable as such things go. We even still have the ability to deploy unguided iron bombs the old fashioned way (I'll let current fighter attack guys weigh in on the current level of proficiency).

We really no longer need the expensive munitions for this conflict, except maybe for an occasional niche application.

The legit concern is that we expended a lot of the high-end stuff, which reduces deterrence in the Pacific until inventories are restored (which will take time due to limited production capacity, even if funded). But the flip side is that we demonstrated to PRC that our chit still works really well, that in and of itself has a deterrent effect. Also demonstrated that the current regime at least isn't afraid of engaging, additional deterrent effect.

Approved as requested
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:44 PM
  #1835  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 491
Likes: 289
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
From the article...."...And it doesn’t help that two of the state’s major refineries closed in the past six months, cutting off almost one-fifth of its fuel-making capacity. Even if the strait reopens soon, its closure has already withheld at least 1 billion barrels from the global market, analysts say. ...

and...

"We are doing everything we can to meet our supply obligations there,” Wirth said. “But it does point out the vulnerabilities that have been created in California as a result of decades of poor energy policy.”
Your points are valid, but so are the OP’s. Lack of foresight is not a trait either party has a monopoly on. We need much better governance from all sides.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:52 PM
  #1836  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,236
Likes: 253
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
"We are doing everything we can to meet our supply obligations there,” Wirth said. “But it does point out the vulnerabilities that have been created in California as a result of decades of poor energy policy.”
Sort of like when they didn’t want the pollution caused by generating electricity. Just wanted someone else to do it and just send them the electrons by wire. “Offshored” the actual production - farmed it out to some corporation…

Enron I think the name was…

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journ...3F531DD768D3F4
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:53 PM
  #1837  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,571
Likes: 336
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda
It’s wild to me watching us dismantle the post WWII international order which WE created solely for OUR benefit, with half the country cheering it on.

I have no idea what’s on the other side of it, but I highly doubt it’s better than us running the carefully crafted world which had us as the only super power since I’ve been alive.

It’s like we had some tantrum, took our ball and stormed home after dominating the playground basketball game for 80 years, much to the bewilderment of our teammates and opponents.
Dont forget WW1 brought in massive rearranging as well, some of it leading to WW2, and then the Balkan conflicts in the 90’s (basically WW2 continued).

Countries affected (or even created) directly:
  • Austria
  • Hungary
  • Czechoslovakia
  • Yugoslavia
  • Poland
  • Finland
  • Estonia
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Turkey
  • Iraq
  • Jordan
  • Syria
  • Lebanon
  • Israel
  • Ireland

Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:54 PM
  #1838  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 491
Likes: 289
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

The legit concern is that we expended a lot of the high-end stuff, which reduces deterrence in the Pacific until inventories are restored (which will take time due to limited production capacity, even if funded). But the flip side is that we demonstrated to PRC that our chit still works really well, that in and of itself has a deterrent effect. Also demonstrated that the current regime at least isn't afraid of engaging, additional deterrent effect.
Did we though? Yes, we killed something like 95% of incoming drones/missiles. But the Iranians were still able to do significant damage to some very high end systems. They would’ve killed a lot more of our people as well, but thank god we had the foresight to evacuate them (kudos to the leadership that made that decision). I feel like an alternate lesson the Chinese or Norks might take away is that if you saturate our defenses with enough targets, you’ll eventually get through, kill the radars & the patriot batteries & therefore threaten our regional forces & make your main operation that much easier. Caveat: those concerns are based on open source information. I’m sure there’s plenty we’re not seeing…..but still…
Reply
Old Yesterday | 01:02 PM
  #1839  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,236
Likes: 253
Default

Originally Posted by Lowslung
Did we though? Yes, we killed something like 95% of incoming drones/missiles. But the Iranians were still able to do significant damage to some very high end systems. They would’ve killed a lot more of our people as well, but thank god we had the foresight to evacuate them (kudos to the leadership that made that decision). I feel like an alternate lesson the Chinese or Norks might take away is that if you saturate our defenses with enough targets, you’ll eventually get through, kill the radars & the patriot batteries & therefore threaten our regional forces & make your main operation that much easier. Caveat: those concerns are based on open source information. I’m sure there’s plenty we’re not seeing…..but still…
ANY ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE DEFENSE CAN BE SATURATED. The defender must defend a whole perimeter while the attacker need attack only a single point on that perimeter - and generally the point they deem least well defended.

Which is why you need deterrence in the form of your own offensive capability, which our NATO allies largely spent the last three and a half decades divesting themselves of.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 01:08 PM
  #1840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,460
Likes: 473
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Even Chuck Schumer called out Obama’s deal as terrible on the senate floor, and would have led them to a nuke by now already. It’s on video. That deal was a massive giveaway, and released over a BILLION dollars in cash Iran used to make EFP IED’s that killed and maimed our boys (and a few girls).
A deal made after two 8 yr predecessors did not. It would NOT have led to a nuke already, that is pure falsehood. The billion in cash was already THEIR money. And you’re going to have to show evidence that cash was trailed to make EFP IEDs that maimed and killed our boys. And what boys? Iran didn’t kill any US soldier recently until after Feb 28. And the 6 that died in the same day was a midair collision, not Iranian military action that shot them down.

After Trump killed the deal in 2018, Iran said screw it now and went ahead with enriching to the degree they had NOT done before. And no more monitoring once that deal was killed in 2018. Killing that deal in 2018 without replacing with a new one - how is that good? You need to be able to criticize fairly. You don’t seem to.



Since you brought it up, masks are worthless, unless they are N-95, properly fitted, and not jammed in your pocket 10x a day (contaminating your hands, pockets, and anything else you touch. Also, it wasn’t a vaccine. Despite what the MSM said, it did not “stop the spread”. Some famous personalities lied when they said “it stops with you”. “This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated “. Demonstrably untrue at best, lies at worst. It was an experimental therapeutic. One that we should all be thankful for, but it was by definition not a vaccine.
Im not going to argue science with you. You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts. You listened to MSNBC and Rachel Maddow? Actually, you didn’t. You saw clips of her on your favorite podcasters and right wing media like Fox. But let’s get down to it, no, a vaccine doesn’t stop you breathing in a virus. You can still catch the virus. The idea was that you wouldn’t get as sick as to end up requiring a hospital bed so we could have those open for the most vulnerable in society - the elder, the pre-existing conditions, etc. Amd the general idea of you wouldn’t get as sick, not be as symptomatic. Win-win. And by the way, operation warp speed to make it in the first place WAS from Trump. Just facts. And everyone at the time on Fox News was vaccinated, despite what they would say every night. Things to think about.


And it was a vaccine, a mRNA type that continues to be used today safely. In fact, you’ll probably see more variants of it for different things than just a coronavirus.




You and I won’t ever see face to face. To come back full circle, I can’t take any of you seriously about Iran. You people have a fantasy that Iran will make a dirty bomb go off in NYC or some large city, and kill what? 50,000-100k? You had 1,000,000 Americans die and your response was to get that face diaper away from me and keep that needle to yourself.


Noted. And summarily dismissed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
3
01-12-2009 07:31 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
0
12-05-2008 08:27 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
11-25-2008 03:28 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
10-26-2008 08:48 PM
robthree
Regional
13
09-01-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices