Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Economic Impacts of Iran War >

Economic Impacts of Iran War


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Economic Impacts of Iran War

Old 05-15-2026 | 04:24 AM
  #1981  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Your face…your a&$, what’s the difference?

LOL Nukem FTW
Hail to the king, baby!
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 06:28 AM
  #1982  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Amazing how that wasn’t a threat of public concern in election 2024. In fact, it was no more new wars and isolationism.
I doubt the Japanese were taken all that seriously before Pearl Harbor, despite the fact they were already occupying Manchuria, China, Korea, and northern Indochina.

Nonetheless, seven previous administrations had stated that Iran coukd not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. It wasn’t like concern about a nuclear armed Iran would have come as a surprise to anyone paying attention.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 09:42 AM
  #1983  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
I doubt the Japanese were taken all that seriously before Pearl Harbor, despite the fact they were already occupying Manchuria, China, Korea, and northern Indochina.

Nonetheless, seven previous administrations had stated that Iran coukd not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. It wasn’t like concern about a nuclear armed Iran would have come as a surprise to anyone paying attention.
Except our own intelligence estimated 10 yr timeframe. But we attacked 3 sites in June. Obliterated, we were told by the WH Press.


And then this war, under the guise we were under “imminent threat.” Thats horse manure - and you know it. I wish some here could at least take that step back and acknowledge that. We were not under any imminent threat. There is no nuke or ballistic missile capable of reaching us from Iran in 2025 or 2026. The reasons for the war changed several times. Then it became well Israel was going to attack, so we feared our bases would get hit, so we attacked too. And then some on APC said this has nothing to do with Iran, it’s actually a power move against Russia and China (LOL).




So - since this back and forth will get nowhere. Let’s just talk about how this ends , because that’s what this thread is really about. Economic impact to us all. How do you envision Trump ending this? I can’t use the 4 letter word that represents a Mexican food item, but I’d be willing to bet we are going to end up getting a terrible deal when all is said and done. But it’ll be played as a victory.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 11:22 AM
  #1984  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,510
Likes: 138
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
So - since this back and forth will get nowhere. Let’s just talk about how this ends , because that’s what this thread is really about. Economic impact to us all. How do you envision Trump ending this? I can’t use the 4 letter word that represents a Mexican food item, but I’d be willing to bet we are going to end up getting a terrible deal when all is said and done. But it’ll be played as a victory.
Never. If intimately familiar with the vast, timeless, cryptic gulf of Islamic/Judaeo-Christian conflict as claimed, you know very well this bad blood fountain of mistrust & hate won’t run dry. Mediation, semi-stable mitigation, in the present, is the best possible outcome we can angle for.



Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 04:52 PM
  #1985  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 237
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by Lowslung
So let’s get this straight: you’re arguing that high fuel prices under Biden were bad, but because he got a pass in your estimation (he didn’t…..he was pushed out of the presidency mainly due to widespread frustration with the economy, but whatever), Trump should also get a pass? Biden did stupid things so Trump should get a turn? About sum it up? Man, that’s some airtight logic right there. You should try out for the masterdebater team.
Yes it was bad under Biden because ~4% of that 9% were directly caused by his failed policies and bills such as the misnamed "Inflation Reduction Act". Gas prices are going up now because we are fighting a threat that has been ignored and coddled for almost 50 years. One is a good reason, the other is not.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 05:37 PM
  #1986  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

Originally Posted by AAdvocate
Yes it was bad under Biden because ~4% of that 9% were directly caused by his failed policies and bills such as the misnamed "Inflation Reduction Act". Gas prices are going up now because we are fighting a threat that has been ignored and coddled for almost 50 years. One is a good reason, the other is not.

No. That is not why gas went up in 2022. Gas went up for 3 main reasons. Huge increase in post pandemic demand, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and sanctions that followed, and the energy industry dynamics when a bunch of energy firms went BK and producers reduced refining and drilling capacity.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 05:38 PM
  #1987  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

“A threat”


Explain how Iran is a threat to people inside the 50 States.


I’ll wait. Lucky for you, I have a pet cricket with restless leg syndrome. And I can hear him.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 05:39 PM
  #1988  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 481
Default

Originally Posted by AAdvocate
Yes it was bad under Biden because ~4% of that 9% were directly caused by his failed policies and bills such as the misnamed "Inflation Reduction Act". Gas prices are going up now because we are fighting a threat that has been ignored and coddled for almost 50 years. One is a good reason, the other is not.
God this is all just such aggravating opinion. Inflation bombed the entire western world. It was slightly better here. Maybe Sleepy Joe Biden’s policies moved the needle 1% either way. It was going to happen for reasons that have been discussed as nauseam.

Nobody was talking about Iran before the election. It was “no new wars”. That was the foreign policy drumbeat. There’s literally nothing this guy will do where you won’t be retroactively justifying it, even if it’s the exact opposite thing that you were yelling about months before.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 05:49 PM
  #1989  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 256
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
“A threat”


Explain how Iran is a threat to people inside the 50 States.


I’ll wait. Lucky for you, I have a pet cricket with restless leg syndrome. And I can hear him.
A terrorist country with nuclear weapons can undoubtedly accomplish more with impunity. I’m sure you’ll be good, though. Just use the secret handshake.
Reply
Old 05-15-2026 | 06:07 PM
  #1990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
A terrorist country with nuclear weapons can undoubtedly accomplish more with impunity. I’m sure you’ll be good, though. Just use the secret handshake.

Newsflash. They don’t have nukes. And they wouldn’t have nukes for the next 10 yrs, esp after last years June bombing. Source: our own U.S. intelligence.




Nuclear weapon is the new boogeyman. NK is even nuttier than Iran, yet they never got bombed like Iran. Weird. Oh wait, I know why.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
3
01-12-2009 07:31 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
0
12-05-2008 08:27 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
11-25-2008 03:28 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
10-26-2008 08:48 PM
robthree
Regional
13
09-01-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices