![]() |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4014899)
Don't give a **** if they are a democracy or not. I do give a **** if said country sponsors terror and has programs to develop nuclear weapons. You're arguing with yourself here.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4014910)
Knock off the insults. I have zero loyalty to Trump or any of his minions (aside from that required by duty to my oath of office).
Then why do you seem to be going into overdrive to defend this? |
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4014884)
Even the Kim’s are in a different class than Iran. Counting on them not using nukes while killing women for not wearing a hijab is a completely different class of nuttery. I don’t think you can compare apples to IEDs there.
Why are we there now? It’s can’t have anything to do with being a lap dog for Netanyahu or oil, right? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4014910)
Knock off the insults. I have zero loyalty to Trump or any of his minions (aside from that required by duty to my oath of office).
|
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 4014908)
What are the “certain objectives”? They keep changing…sometimes hourly.
Regime change? Compliant regime 2.0? Nuclear program severely degraded? Proxies cut off from support? Lower conventional threat to the GCC? Loss of future ability to interfere with shipping? Message sent to other Evil Empires (mission accomplished at this point I think). Kind of like a Chinese menu, he'll take what he can get up until it gets too hot in the kitchen and he has to pack it in. |
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 4014908)
What are the “certain objectives”? They keep changing…sometimes hourly.
- Desultory Iran's missile base so they can never rebuild - Destroy their Navy - Make sure they never have the capability to develop a nuclear weapon |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4014913)
Then why do you seem to be going into overdrive to defend this?
This is kind of like investment strategy. My preference is traditional EFT/Index funds for predictability and stability. As opposed to say private equity startup investment, which has high risk, uncertainty, and potential for high reward. But if my spouse invested our retirement fund in private equity (which typically has a lengthy lock), I would be analyzing how *that* is going, and future prospects. It might even look bullish at some point. Might as well look forward, because you can't get your money back out until the end regardless. "This all bad and will only get worse" is just TDS. Stop talking about me, just stick to current events. |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4014918)
Been pretty clear to me. If you get your news from the Ladies of The View then yes you would probably think that.
- Desultory Iran's missile base so they can never rebuild - Destroy their Navy - Make sure they never have the capability to develop a nuclear weapon Also... How do you plan on finding the 400 kilos of enriched Uranium in a country the size of Alaska? |
Originally Posted by flyprdu
(Post 4014922)
Also... "Rise up! Take your country back!"
Also... How do you plan on finding the 400 kilos of enriched Uranium in a country the size of Alaska? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4014917)
Loss of future ability to interfere with shipping?
I feel like there was probably a big ways/means/ends, forces/capabilities/effects, enemy actions/counters conversation somewhere in a SCIF in Tampa. And it was effectively a field grade circle jerk because this was either somehow overlooked or the pentagon and the admin didn’t care or know to care that it would be a problem. Either way, huge swing and miss. We entered the conflict on our terms. And the spot price of Jet-A is now $4.26 according to A4A. Gonna be an interesting fall/winter if this keeps up. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands