Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Jet Fuel Shortage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2026 | 03:56 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 185
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
The embargo in the 70s, when the spigot actually shut was more of a shock.
Sorry, the "spigot actually (didn't) shut".

1973–74 Shock: Arab oil producers embargoed the US, with production cuts amounting to about 7% of global oil consumption. Oil prices quadrupled in some markets.

1979–80 Shock: The Iranian Revolution led to a decrease of nearly 4.8 million barrels per day, roughly 7% of world production at the time.
Old 04-13-2026 | 04:40 AM
  #22  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 299
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
Sorry, the "spigot actually (didn't) shut".

1973–74 Shock: Arab oil producers embargoed the US, with production cuts amounting to about 7% of global oil consumption. Oil prices quadrupled in some markets.

1979–80 Shock: The Iranian Revolution led to a decrease of nearly 4.8 million barrels per day, roughly 7% of world production at the time.
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.

US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit.

As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market."

Old 04-13-2026 | 04:47 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 185
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
...this is a short term shock...
Really? When and how will it end?
Old 04-13-2026 | 04:48 AM
  #24  
Judge Smails's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 941
Likes: 250
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I remember 2022 when the Biden “I did that!” Stickers were on gas pumps.



I better see the same for Trump now.
https://a.co/d/0hYgF5HN

I like that they’re oversized. Good solution for a variety of products.
Old 04-13-2026 | 04:51 AM
  #25  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 299
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
Really? When and how will it end?
Its been less than 2 months so its very much in the short/near term arena.

How will this end? No idea.
Old 04-13-2026 | 04:53 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,520
Likes: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.

US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit.

As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market."
You can't be serious in your statement about energy infrastructure.

Also, it's irrelevant if US infrastructure is hit or not. Oil is a global commodity, not a local one.
Old 04-13-2026 | 05:18 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 592
Likes: 108
From: 73FO
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.

US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit.
I don’t think oil prices care if the bombs that destroyed a large chunk of middle eastern petroleum infrastructure cares were American, Israeli or Iranian. The fact is if Trump and Israel didn’t start this very poorly thought out, and even more poorly executed war then the oil infrastructure would be perfectly fine and humming along at the $70 per barrel status quo. But such is the price of “winning”.
Old 04-13-2026 | 05:20 AM
  #28  
Judge Smails's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 941
Likes: 250
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.

US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit.

As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market."
I think you’re missing a minor detail with the infrastructure. The Iranians, with the missiles and drones we completely wiped out, have damaged or destroyed significant infrastructure in Gulf states.

https://www.insurancejournal.com/new...news%20agency.

…and now we’re blockading the Iranian blockade after we lifted sanctions on Iranian oil to help keep prices down. The brilliance of this 4D chess game is beyond comprehension.
Old 04-13-2026 | 06:49 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 491
Likes: 289
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.

US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit.

As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market."
Head, meet sand. Conservative estimates say 30-40% of Persian Gulf infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed. Gulf states are being very cagey about publicizing damage, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the percentage is actually higher. 20% is an absolutely huge shock to the system and that’s not even accounting for things like the specific kerosene needed to make ice resistant Jet A or natural gas, which are being squeezed even tighter. The fact that a barrel of oil hasn’t absolutely skyrocketed in price yet is meaningless if your airline can’t put fuel in the tanks at any price.
Old 04-13-2026 | 06:51 AM
  #30  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 299
Default

Iran lashing out and damaging refineries to an industry they also need was an impotent, childish lash out because they have no leverage over the Persian Gulf now. US and IDF have air superiority, Iranian naval presence is almost null, as much as AP, CNN, MSNBC want the mines to be a factor, and the drones are hap- hazard, and a pin prick tactically speaking.

Poorly executed? 5,000 targets prosecuted, over 125 aircraft destroyed, govt/mil communications severely degraded, zero airlift/support capacity, Naval and Ground force operations nil, not to mention Ayatollah eliminated and their nuclear ambitions also severely degraded.

Overall Iran finally put in its place and will continue to be. Stress on global oil and economies? Yes. Meltdown and impending doom coming due today regional conflict because less than 20% of the world's crude is being affected? Nope.

Direct action is messy, diplomacy is messy. It hasn't been 2 months. I love how the media and so many people are losing and asking why hasn't everything been solved already!? This operation hasn't been perfect?! Outrageous! The US is attacking a regime that murders 40K of its own people and sponsors terror proxies. Outrageous!

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
16
12-08-2015 03:13 PM
Sailor
Spirit
14254
10-09-2015 07:55 AM
Ultralight
Regional
88
06-27-2013 10:06 AM
vagabond
Major
20
05-03-2008 12:03 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices