Airbus or Boeing?
#41
Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW
The A-320 limits pilot inputs to 67 degrees bank in normal law...which incidentally would produce a load factor of 2.5Gs in level flight. The upper load limit in the clean configuration is 2.5Gs. The protections were designed that way so that we couldn't tear the wings off of it. The problems IMO begin when guys don't understand, misuse, or abuse the automation (NW captain who turned off all 7 flight computers on a revenue flight, Indian Airlines crash, Paris air show accident, etc.)
#42
Originally Posted by ryane946
A pilot loses his engine in his single engine F-16.
F-16 pilot: "Mayday, mayday, declaring an emergency. I've lost my engine, and I'm returning to land on runway 36."
Tower: "F-16, roger, your number behind a B-52 with an engine failure. Follow him.
F-16 pilot: "Aaaah, the dreaded 7 engine approach."
Joke goes something like that.
F-16 pilot: "Mayday, mayday, declaring an emergency. I've lost my engine, and I'm returning to land on runway 36."
Tower: "F-16, roger, your number behind a B-52 with an engine failure. Follow him.
F-16 pilot: "Aaaah, the dreaded 7 engine approach."
Joke goes something like that.
#44
Originally Posted by Packer Backer
So Drew, ever fly a modern Airbus?
It seriously worries me when the crew, who have been through all the sterling training, keeps scratching their heads and asking/saying: “What’s that noise? . . . Why is it doing that?. . How come I can’t make it do this?. . ”
Pilots are supposed to FLY. . NOT be an “IT” .. . monitoring the damn computers. . Airbus is ‘pretend’ flying (an expensive GameBoy) .. because your hand is NOT physically connected to any control surfaces. . and you can’t make the machine ‘do’ everything you would like it to do (en extremis) .. and often you are wondering WHAT the hell it IS doing . .and why.
#45
"Modern" airplanes
Originally Posted by captain_drew
It seriously worries me when the crew, who have been through all the sterling training, keeps scratching their heads and asking/saying: “What’s that noise? . . . Why is it doing that?. . How come I can’t make it do this?. . ”
That's what a lot of asked when we started flying the MD-88. The good news was that you could shut off the new stuff and still have a DC-9 underneath, with some components even predating that airplane. For example, the old Douglas instructor at the LGB factory school asked: "Why does the right hydraulic aux pump have a spring-loaded 'override' position?" After getting the "book" answer about bypassing an overheat shutoff, he said: "Actually, we had a lot of those switches left over from the DC-8 program, so we had to come up with a function for that position on the DC-9."
The slat actuators came from the DC-10, and were therefore so large that they cavitated both hydraulic systems until a restrictor valve was retrofitted. And the sliding windows? Looked like DC-6 vintage!
Great airplane though.
Last edited by tomgoodman; 03-16-2006 at 07:48 AM.
#46
Originally Posted by captain_drew
As a career long commuter, I probably logged more time on the jumpseat than most posters here have PIC time <g>. It is a French piece of crap.
It seriously worries me when the crew, who have been through all the sterling training, keeps scratching their heads and asking/saying: “What’s that noise? . . . Why is it doing that?. . How come I can’t make it do this?. . ”
Pilots are supposed to FLY. . NOT be an “IT” .. . monitoring the damn computers. . Airbus is ‘pretend’ flying (an expensive GameBoy) .. because your hand is NOT physically connected to any control surfaces. . and you can’t make the machine ‘do’ everything you would like it to do (en extremis) .. and often you are wondering WHAT the hell it IS doing . .and why.
It seriously worries me when the crew, who have been through all the sterling training, keeps scratching their heads and asking/saying: “What’s that noise? . . . Why is it doing that?. . How come I can’t make it do this?. . ”
Pilots are supposed to FLY. . NOT be an “IT” .. . monitoring the damn computers. . Airbus is ‘pretend’ flying (an expensive GameBoy) .. because your hand is NOT physically connected to any control surfaces. . and you can’t make the machine ‘do’ everything you would like it to do (en extremis) .. and often you are wondering WHAT the hell it IS doing . .and why.
And as for your comment about not being physically connected to any control surfaces, do you feel the same about the 777? It is all fly by wire as well, right? What about the DC10? Are you physically "connected" to the control surfaces or are you connected to a pcu?
Maybe it's just that you just don't trust the computers. Do you trust the FMS or GPS? How about the stall computer? How about the IRS or the ADIRU? Maybe it's just that you "prefer" American made cars and airplanes.
Like somebody said before, anybody who hates a modern Airbus has probably never flown one.
#47
I think a major thought when purchasing an aircraft is not only how it flies, but passenger comfort.
So I have a question for anyone who has ever flown a A320? What the heck is that annoying noise!!! It sounds like the flaps are coming down, but it takes way too long (a minute or so), and it is way too loud (eeeeeeerrrrrrrrr). You hear it on the ground before push back, and you hear it around engine shut down. It starts to fade out, and it progressivley gets slower (eeeer,eeeer,...eeer,eeer,.........eer,eer). Sorry, I know thats not real descriptive, but if you've ever heard you, you'd know what I'm talking about. I have heard it on every A320 flight I have taken. It is real annoying. The passengers always ask the flight attendent what the heck it is, and I have no idea what it is.
Any ideas?
So I have a question for anyone who has ever flown a A320? What the heck is that annoying noise!!! It sounds like the flaps are coming down, but it takes way too long (a minute or so), and it is way too loud (eeeeeeerrrrrrrrr). You hear it on the ground before push back, and you hear it around engine shut down. It starts to fade out, and it progressivley gets slower (eeeer,eeeer,...eeer,eeer,.........eer,eer). Sorry, I know thats not real descriptive, but if you've ever heard you, you'd know what I'm talking about. I have heard it on every A320 flight I have taken. It is real annoying. The passengers always ask the flight attendent what the heck it is, and I have no idea what it is.
Any ideas?
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
PTU or the barking dog
Originally Posted by ryane946
I think a major thought when purchasing an aircraft is not only how it flies, but passenger comfort.
So I have a question for anyone who has ever flown a A320? What the heck is that annoying noise!!! It sounds like the flaps are coming down, but it takes way too long (a minute or so), and it is way too loud (eeeeeeerrrrrrrrr). You hear it on the ground before push back, and you hear it around engine shut down. It starts to fade out, and it progressivley gets slower (eeeer,eeeer,...eeer,eeer,.........eer,eer). Sorry, I know thats not real descriptive, but if you've ever heard you, you'd know what I'm talking about. I have heard it on every A320 flight I have taken. It is real annoying. The passengers always ask the flight attendent what the heck it is, and I have no idea what it is.
Any ideas?
So I have a question for anyone who has ever flown a A320? What the heck is that annoying noise!!! It sounds like the flaps are coming down, but it takes way too long (a minute or so), and it is way too loud (eeeeeeerrrrrrrrr). You hear it on the ground before push back, and you hear it around engine shut down. It starts to fade out, and it progressivley gets slower (eeeer,eeeer,...eeer,eeer,.........eer,eer). Sorry, I know thats not real descriptive, but if you've ever heard you, you'd know what I'm talking about. I have heard it on every A320 flight I have taken. It is real annoying. The passengers always ask the flight attendent what the heck it is, and I have no idea what it is.
Any ideas?
The noise you hear is called the PTU or power transfer unit and is basically a backup hydraulic pump. The A320 has three hydraulic systems Green, Blue, and Yellow. The Blue is run entirely by electric pumps or a ram air turbine in an emergency. The Green and Yellow are normally driven by engine driven pumps, although the yellow system has an electric and a hand pump as well. The green and yellow systems share a common two-way pump called a PTU. If the pump senses a certain differential in the pressure between the green and yellow hydraulic systems, it pumps pressure into the weaker system to bring it back up to 3000 psi. The whole idea is that unless you lose fluid, you should be able to keep the all of the major hydraulic systems operational on the airplane in the event of engine or engine driven pump failure. The pump action is kind of like an mechanical accordian flexing back and forth, which is what makes the barking dog sound. You hear it often on the ground because the system does a self test during the engine start process(there are a series of things that will inhibit that aren't worth getting into). You will also hear it on single engine taxis, if the crew elects to taxi on the number 2 because the yellow system will be at 3000 psi and the green at 0 because the engine isn't running. If you single engine taxi with the number 1 engine and turn on the yellow system electric pump, both systems will be pressurized and you won't hear the barking dog, but you will hear a slight whine from the yellow electric pump until the 2nd engine is started and the electric pump is shut off. Hydraulic pumps on all airplanes get worn out like everything else, so sometimes you'll hear the PTU momentarily when the gear or flaps move causing a high temporary draw on one hydraulic system kicking in the PTU. You'll also hear it on shut down if the crew taxiied in on one engine and forgot to turn off the yellow system electric pump at the gate.
#49
Originally Posted by Packer Backer
Maybe it's just that you "prefer" American made cars and airplanes.
HAVE owned & Prefer (not necessiarily in order of preference):
BMW
Mercedes
Porsche
Suburu
Toyota (Pickups and Priius)
Volvo
We have, coming up, the 1st generation of aviators who really won’t know how to actually ‘fly’. You saw the article about the hapless All Nippon crew who declared an Emergency because their auto pilot went tits up?
#50
Too close to call
Originally Posted by Packer Backer
The best performance you will ever get in avoiding an obstacle will be in an Airbus. You may get better performance in a Boeing for about 1 second before the wings fall off and you crash into that mountain you were trying to climb over.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post