Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Guess CAL & UAL are already in bed together >

Guess CAL & UAL are already in bed together

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Guess CAL & UAL are already in bed together

Old 09-11-2008, 05:11 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,878
Default Guess CAL & UAL are already in bed together

So now we know where CAL picked up its newest Heathrow slot.

Continental closes Gatwick operation

By Kevin Done, Aerospace Correspondent
Financial Times
Tuesday Sep 9 2008 13:40

Continental Airlines (NYSE:CAL) , one of the leading US carriers, is abandoning its long-standing base at Gatwick airport in order to concentrate its London operations at Heathrow.

It said on Tuesday it was dropping its flights to Gatwick from its US hubs at New York Newark with two daily services and Houston with one daily service.

It is adding one more daily flight between Heathrow and Newark increasing the service to three a day in order to improve its competitiveness against the leading carriers on the London-New York route, British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and American Airlines.

It also operates twice daily flights between Heathrow and Houston.
Continental is the US carrier that has taken most advantage of the opening of Heathrow to full competition from all US and European airlines since the end of March, when the "open skies" treaty between the US and European Union came into force liberalising transatlantic aviation.

It set a record for Heathrow slot prices in 2007 when it paid $209m for four pairs of take-off and landing slots to start twice-daily services from Houston and New York Newark. It acquired two slot pairs from GB Airways, one from Air France and one from Alitalia.

It is leasing its fifth slot pair at Heathrow from United Airlines for the additional New York service, which will begin on October 25.

Jim Compton, Continental's executive vice-president marketing, said: "Our focus on Heathrow is a response to the changing realities of the marketplace. Our customers have shown a clear preference for Heathrow and our main competitors have focused their operations there.

"We regret the need to end year-round operations at Gatwick, but it is imperative that we remain competitive," he said.

The airline said 44 jobs would be eliminated at Gatwick as a result of the move.

The US carrier operates to more destinations in the UK from New York than any other airline with services to Heathrow, Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Manchester.

American Airlines also closed its Gatwick base this year as part of the move to consolidate its London operations at Heathrow tranferring its flights to Dallas Fort Worth and Raleigh Durham.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 05:43 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Splanky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Moving backwards
Posts: 220
Default

Getting into bed with United with current United management is like getting into bed with the girl at the bar that has the drug-resistant strain of chlamydia.
Splanky is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 06:54 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Sad to see what's happened to UAL. Heathrow slots are the best thing out there (Just ask CO, who payed out the nose for them. Or United, who got theirs from Pan Am, signaling the death knell of the once great "Clipper"). United leasing them to a competitor seems asinine - why lease a route between the largest air travel market in the world and the gateway airport to the rest of the world (AA is even rumored to break even on it's RDU-LHR flight w/ just premium passengers and cargo, the economy is all gravy!) Then again, that seems to be SOP for UA these days, unfortunately.
Sniper is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 07:46 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B737-800 Captain, Dubai
Posts: 64
Default

Unless UAL and CAL know something we don't about their future plans together...
RandyBMC is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 07:57 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,878
Default

Originally Posted by beeker View Post
No more Cleveland to gatwick?
CLE-LGW is seasonal service anyway from late May to late September. In other stories I saw that CAL was ending "year-round service" to LGW. Could mean that CLE-LGW will be back next summer as usual. They would only have to special assign gate agents up to LGW for the one daily flight OR they could contract with another company to provide ground handling. Who knows?
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:06 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrail67's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737
Posts: 590
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr View Post
So now we know where CAL picked up its newest Heathrow slot.

Continental closes Gatwick operation

By Kevin Done, Aerospace Correspondent
Financial Times
Tuesday Sep 9 2008 13:40

Continental Airlines (NYSE:CAL) , one of the leading US carriers, is abandoning its long-standing base at Gatwick airport in order to concentrate its London operations at Heathrow.

It said on Tuesday it was dropping its flights to Gatwick from its US hubs at New York Newark with two daily services and Houston with one daily service.

It is adding one more daily flight between Heathrow and Newark increasing the service to three a day in order to improve its competitiveness against the leading carriers on the London-New York route, British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and American Airlines.

It also operates twice daily flights between Heathrow and Houston.
Continental is the US carrier that has taken most advantage of the opening of Heathrow to full competition from all US and European airlines since the end of March, when the "open skies" treaty between the US and European Union came into force liberalising transatlantic aviation.

It set a record for Heathrow slot prices in 2007 when it paid $209m for four pairs of take-off and landing slots to start twice-daily services from Houston and New York Newark. It acquired two slot pairs from GB Airways, one from Air France and one from Alitalia.

It is leasing its fifth slot pair at Heathrow from United Airlines for the additional New York service, which will begin on October 25.

Jim Compton, Continental's executive vice-president marketing, said: "Our focus on Heathrow is a response to the changing realities of the marketplace. Our customers have shown a clear preference for Heathrow and our main competitors have focused their operations there.

"We regret the need to end year-round operations at Gatwick, but it is imperative that we remain competitive," he said.

The airline said 44 jobs would be eliminated at Gatwick as a result of the move.

The US carrier operates to more destinations in the UK from New York than any other airline with services to Heathrow, Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Manchester.

American Airlines also closed its Gatwick base this year as part of the move to consolidate its London operations at Heathrow tranferring its flights to Dallas Fort Worth and Raleigh Durham.

Its all going to be one in just a matter of time...it won't matter.
contrail67 is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:25 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,538
Default

By summer next year, UAL and CAL will have announced a merger. I have been saying it for some time. It just makes way too much sense.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:27 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

I hope not. Code share is enough for me. I don't want to look for another job next year.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 06:24 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

If UAL and CAL merged, I hope many of the UAL guys get the clickers back out. It'd help empower the younger/junior CO pilots too, which would be good for unity across the seniority list. Nothing liked getting reminded of your past by your FO's for the rest of your career to drive you to leave early.

The UAL pilot group would be a great addition to CAL's (if the 2 sides could ever agree on an integration, that is). UAL's route structure would be good too - they got many of Pan Am's desirable route authorities, and of course UAL's history goes back to Boeing. With CO's 'most international destinations' it could work. UAL's management would be what'd I'd really worry about. The 'midas touch' isn't something they have much experience with.
Sniper is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 07:01 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
If UAL and CAL merged, I hope many of the UAL guys get the clickers back out. It'd help empower the younger/junior CO pilots too, which would be good for unity across the seniority list. Nothing liked getting reminded of your past by your FO's for the rest of your career to drive you to leave early.

The UAL pilot group would be a great addition to CAL's (if the 2 sides could ever agree on an integration, that is). UAL's route structure would be good too - they got many of Pan Am's desirable route authorities, and of course UAL's history goes back to Boeing. With CO's 'most international destinations' it could work. UAL's management would be what'd I'd really worry about. The 'midas touch' isn't something they have much experience with.
I hear the United pilots at the recent ALPA national BOD meeting tried to introduce a resolution for a national seniority list. It was rejected but it looks to me like an attempt to do an end-run around having to negotiate with CAL and American when the inevitable takes place.
gufusu is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flybynuts
Major
55
08-19-2008 08:35 AM
WatchThis!
Union Talk
71
08-01-2008 07:43 PM
SWAjet
Major
1
03-17-2005 10:41 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-25-2005 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices