Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

US AIR Deliveries??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2008 | 11:33 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Speaking French
Default

The medical situation has only been the last 6mo. I was applying to to Alaska with over 2000 PIC while at the same time interviewing guys to fly for the commuter I was at that are know flying for Alaska. It's not like I'm over the hill, I'm in my mid 30's. I grew up in the NW, 4 year degree, check airman, chief pilot, clean record, recomendations walked in, yada, yada, yada. Don't worry though I'm working on those DUI's. The guy that did get hired with the DUI's is a good pilot, but it only grinds in the fact I should have at least gotten called for an interview a long, long time ago. If I had put half the effort into Southwest I'd put into Alaska I'd be a Captain full of LUV.
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 06:22 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Flying both desk and jet
Default

Sorry to report guys....Their will be no A330 on the property at US Airways anytime soon. I am sure China route will be given to someone else by 2010. Not alot of expansion in China in 2009 with the economy.

US Airways management only knows how to shrink to profitability. Eventually you just cease to exist, because you shrank so much, now you can no longer compete.

I use to have hope for US Airways, now it is just like the Titanic, slowly going down, and taking for people within.
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 04:29 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by alwaysflying
Sorry to report guys....Their will be no A330 on the property at US Airways anytime soon. I am sure China route will be given to someone else by 2010. Not alot of expansion in China in 2009 with the economy.

US Airways management only knows how to shrink to profitability. Eventually you just cease to exist, because you shrank so much, now you can no longer compete.

I use to have hope for US Airways, now it is just like the Titanic, slowly going down, and taking for people within.
That's probably true. See this link:
US Airways | Press Releases
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 06:32 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Telecom Company, President
Default

Okay I am scratching my head now.

Three new routes: PHL to Oslow
PHL to Birmingham
PHL to Tel Aviv
Resumption of CLT to CDG

Meanwhile the current Int'l fleet is barely keeping up with what they have already. So HOW are they going to handle the addtl flying without the 330 deliverys slated for 09????

What am I missing here?
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 06:47 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: The Far Side
Default

current Int'l fleet is barely keeping up

What am I missing here?
Now admittedly it's a different management from when I was working (PHX versus PIT), but the decision methodology seems to be the same. Often over the course of my time there something would happen that was incomprehensible. My thoughts usually were that I didn't have the big picture and that I was missing something. I wasn't - the decision was just stupid. It's entirely possible that "one hand isn't talking to the other". I (and many others here) could go on literally forever. I'm just glad I'm gone. Titanic metaphor - no, I didn't don women's clothing and sneak onto a lifeboat. I retired VERY early!

There could be a good reason for this disparity, but obviously I doubt it.
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 09:05 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hangaber
That's probably true. See this link:
US Airways | Press Releases
OK, the link didn't go exactly to the press release I wanted but it's one of those. Sorry so here's a cut and paste of some of it. Note second bullet point:

US Airways Accelerates Business Model Transformation
TEMPE, Ariz., Jun 12, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- US Airways (NYSE: LCC) today announced that it is making additional domestic capacity reductions, reducing headcount and implementing several new revenue initiatives to help expedite the airline's return to sustained profitability in this new and challenging environment.

Major changes and initiatives announced today include:


* Reducing fourth quarter domestic mainline capacity by six to eight percent on a year-over-year basis.


* Returning 10 mainline aircraft in 2008 and 2009, canceling the leases of two A330 aircraft that were scheduled for delivery in 2009, and planning to reduce additional aircraft in 2009 and 2010.

Last edited by hangaber; 11-05-2008 at 08:50 AM.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 03:51 AM
  #17  
CactusCrew's Avatar
Tri-tanic operator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Doggie
Default

Originally Posted by rotorhead1026
Now admittedly it's a different management from when I was working (PHX versus PIT), but the decision methodology seems to be the same. Often over the course of my time there something would happen that was incomprehensible. My thoughts usually were that I didn't have the big picture and that I was missing something. I wasn't - the decision was just stupid. It's entirely possible that "one hand isn't talking to the other". I (and many others here) could go on literally forever. I'm just glad I'm gone. Titanic metaphor - no, I didn't don women's clothing and sneak onto a lifeboat. I retired VERY early!

There could be a good reason for this disparity, but obviously I doubt it.

From what I vaguely recall ... AWA management wanted to serve the Hawaiin Islands from PHX / LAS for YEARS ! But low and behold, the Airbus was not capable.

FINALLY someone figured out that their fleet of B757s could be taken off the PHX-TUS-PHX-LAX-PHX-LAS-PHX non-stops and converted to ETOPS birds for the Hawaii flights.

But it was a revelation that they had such a capable a/c in their inventory already ... FWIW

What am I trying to say ? The names and faces have changed, but don't expect to be impressed by the PHX decisions.

Later
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:17 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Telecom Company, President
Default

Well one thing they MIGHT do is replace domestic 757's with newly arrived A-321's and then convert the 75's to ETOPS.

However I have NOT seen any annoucement of canceling the 5 330's that are slated for 2009 delivery.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:19 AM
  #19  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Originally Posted by IronWalt
Okay I am scratching my head now.

Three new routes: PHL to Oslow
PHL to Birmingham
PHL to Tel Aviv
Resumption of CLT to CDG

Meanwhile the current Int'l fleet is barely keeping up with what they have already. So HOW are they going to handle the addtl flying without the 330 deliverys slated for 09????

What am I missing here?
I would guess that if they are planning on new destinations while acquiring no new international aircraft, they will cut existing international service. They could eliminate destinations, or they could simply reduce frequencies to existing destinations to free up airframes.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 03:31 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 26
From: B777/CA retired
Default

First 2 A321s for the West come Dec 1st. New jets off the Airbus line, no pax entertainment systems.

I was told by the Maui station manager we are going to 2 flights a day in Dec for OGG, HNL and KOA (2 a day is new for KOA) and 1 a day for LIH. We are down to 10 757s out west with the last non ETOPs jet going away in Jan. Don't know how we are going to do all those flights and still operate our slots out of DCA with the 757s we are mandated. Oh well, more West flying for East crews while our guys are furloughed out of seniority.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Red Forman
Military
20
10-20-2008 10:10 AM
williamgoss
Foreign
15
10-02-2008 03:13 AM
wingnutC-17
Military
97
09-26-2008 02:32 AM
IPAMD11FO
Major
71
08-09-2008 03:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices