Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Regionals flying mainline routes >

Regionals flying mainline routes

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Regionals flying mainline routes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2008 | 09:16 PM
  #71  
contrails's Avatar
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
Default

Stop calling them what you all call them.

Refer to them as vendors, contractors, whatever you want that makes sense.

Quit saying 'regional' when there is nothing regional about it.

Perhaps that will at least change the mentality of some.
Reply
Old 11-29-2008 | 11:25 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Are you a pilot? Do you even know anything at all about the RLA?
We aren't exactly playing evenly anymore. It may be a free market system, but under the RLA we are fighting with one hand behind our backs. It is all fine and good to say they can hire any novice commercial pilot and teach them to be a FO.... what you're missing is that FO's are not making command decisions in the airplanes. They have basically run out of skilled professional labor willing to take the job for such low pay and are recruiting people who just don't know any better....

All the pilot unions are saying is that since the govet completely deregulated the industry, they need to deregulate the labor force as well so we can effectively negotiate fair wages and rules. The current system does not allow our labor representatives a fair opportunity to negotiate effectively. The current system basically has the employee trapped with no other option except to leave. Your solution of leaving isn't very realistic, but it makes a great soundbyte.
Mason
Milky is a pilot wanna be. Go to the Union forum and you will see a discussion on unionization that will give you a clear picture of who you are communicating with. Absolutely no experience or a management plant or both.
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 05:08 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by cgtpilot
You must still be at Eagle hoping for the TA to come alive again like I was ...airplanes will fly themselves without pilots before the APA will ever allow that.

Well...No I'm not at Eagle. And I think the pref. hiring thing is BS. Just a carrot to keep the a$$ pulling the cart.

But I'm curious, why do you say APA (or ALPA) would never allow that, (other than we pilots ability to always snatch defeat from the jaws of victory)! I see no loss to the mainline guys in the process. Any pain would be felt at the RJ level. And that would only be temporary. It would definitely shift the negotiating power back to the union.
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 06:25 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Delta Colors Busholio
Default

Originally Posted by Onfinal
Wish I didn't jump in on this thread so late, because I've been thinking a lot about these issues recently.

The way I see it, most of us get it all wrong. We debate whether or not a 50 seat vs a 90 seat vs a 70 seat jet is a regional. Canadair is coming out with a 110 seat Regional Jet in a few years guys. We debate the lengths of routes to ascertain whether a regional flight stage length should be 250 miles or less, or a mainline should be more. Fact is that all these numbers are arbitrary; and as long as they are arbitrary, at some point management is going to challenge them to their advantage.

There is only one solution to this quagmire, The brand that you fly, should be the contract you work under! That means Eagle pilots should be employees of American under the same contract as AA mainline pilots. Ditto for Expressjet and Continental, Air Whiskey and USAir, and Comair for Delta. One airline, ONE pilot group . Until we realize this, we'll be forever whipsawed back and forth against each other!

The power to do this is with the mainline guys. Demand a single contract for all gauges of flying under your company's logo. Does this sound improbable...Yes, Is it impossible...No!
The sad part is that at one time the APA represented Eagle pilots! APA then discarded them claiming they couldn't defend their own flying and represent them pilots in the same fashion.

Now days, the NWA MEC represents NWA and Compass.
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 07:11 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rotorhead
The sad part is that at one time the APA represented Eagle pilots! APA then discarded them claiming they couldn't defend their own flying and represent them pilots in the same fashion.

Now days, the NWA MEC represents NWA and Compass.
Same with CALALPA.....CAL and Express pilots were one in the same (One MEC) until CAL pilots decided to kick Express to curb. I dont think the CAL pilots knew how much power they were giving up when this happened.
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 09:29 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by Rotorhead
The sad part is that at one time the APA represented Eagle pilots! APA then discarded them claiming they couldn't defend their own flying and represent them pilots in the same fashion.

Now days, the NWA MEC represents NWA and Compass.
Yeah, the concept of the NWA MEC is a start. But what I'm advocating is a single contract for all lines of flying. So for example. The Delta Pilot contract would cover all lines from the CRJ-200 to the 747-400. Initially fences can be set up so that current RJ guys would be fenced into RJ bidding over a period of say 5 years, after which there would be one integrated pilot group. Yes, the seniority list will eventually be merged but we are in a unique time where a stapling of the RJ guys to the bottom of the list, would not affect the QOL for 95% of both groups. I know this concept is not perfect, but it sure is a better alternative than 20 more years of the current arrangement.
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 09:42 AM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
So can't I call mine a 75? Or must I say EMB170-200 when refering to the 175? Btm line who cares. It's an 86 seat passenger aircraft that should be operated as a mainline aircraft by mainline pilots. However, if they won't fight to get it, I am not going to fight to give it to them. I got an idea, how about have scope limit them to 700 miles? Then we could fly it full all year long. How about not allowing hub to hub operations. Make the feeder its supposed to be.

I did find it funny how you say "not to be a nerd" while in fact engaging in nerdism.
I don't really know what it'll take to get those things back to mainline but maybe eventually they will be there? As far as calling it what it is..... there's a difference between calling it what it is and what it is not. Sure, we can all pretend that you fly a 75.... thought I've never heard of anyone referring to anything but a Boeing aircraft as a 75. Maybe you can start a trend?

Originally Posted by XJkid
And he said "brah." Must have spikey hair and fly for Pinnacle.
Alright, yeah you're right, "brah" sounds a bit juvenile. But it seems to be gaining traction outside of HI, oddly enough, so I thought I'd throw it out there.

By the way, Pinnacle flight attendants spike their hair, not the pilots. Haven't met a one with spiked hair.
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 10:12 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Rotorhead
The sad part is that at one time the APA represented Eagle pilots! APA then discarded them claiming they couldn't defend their own flying and represent them pilots in the same fashion.

Now days, the NWA MEC represents NWA and Compass.
The major MECs kicked the regionals out when it was realized that the RJs where taking their flying and their jobs....and never to return. The APA once said Eagle would never fly jets and as long as that held true maybe Eagle would still be APA. Its hard to fairly represent 2 pilot groups on 2 different sides of the business from the same HQ. Just ask the RALPA
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 10:29 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by cgtpilot
The major MECs kicked the regionals out when it was realized that the RJs where taking their flying and their jobs....and never to return. The APA once said Eagle would never fly jets and as long as that held true maybe Eagle would still be APA. Its hard to fairly represent 2 pilot groups on 2 different sides of the business from the same HQ. Just ask the RALPA
Exactly! A house divided, and who's benefited over the divide...airline management and large financial institutions, but sure not us. One contract...its the only solution. Also, who said it was 2 different sides of the business (I understand your comment is intended as a statement of past fact). However, as far as we should be concerned if we're flying turboprops, RJs, or mainline jets we're in the same business with the same issues. Management sure has figured this out! When will we?
Reply
Old 11-30-2008 | 05:57 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Delta Colors Busholio
Default

Originally Posted by Onfinal
Yeah, the concept of the NWA MEC is a start. But what I'm advocating is a single contract for all lines of flying. So for example. The Delta Pilot contract would cover all lines from the CRJ-200 to the 747-400. Initially fences can be set up so that current RJ guys would be fenced into RJ bidding over a period of say 5 years, after which there would be one integrated pilot group. Yes, the seniority list will eventually be merged but we are in a unique time where a stapling of the RJ guys to the bottom of the list, would not affect the QOL for 95% of both groups. I know this concept is not perfect, but it sure is a better alternative than 20 more years of the current arrangement.
When I was at Eagle, I would have gladly accepted fences and a staple for 10 years, at least there would have been hope.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
Foxcow
Trans States Airlines
223
11-14-2008 11:15 PM
fireman0174
Foreign
2
10-12-2008 07:03 PM
drosenst
Compass Airlines
122
09-04-2008 12:31 PM
ficone
Military
5
08-28-2008 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices