Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
What are your thought's on this idea? >

What are your thought's on this idea?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

What are your thought's on this idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2009, 06:11 AM
  #41  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Valid comments, but I thnk that at this point (flying sweptwing jet airline aircraft) stall spin PREVENTION would be more beneficial than spin exposure.

During intial RJ training at my airline, I got to do a full stall (with the SPS system off) and it went into a tail slide, flipped inverted at the blink of an eye and then mimiced that scene in the Right Stuff where the Chuck Yeager character is bouncing around the cockpit with all these wild gyrations outside the canopy. Except it my case, it was night and all I could do was apply the typical anti-stall/spin inputs in either direction and watch as the attitude indicator spun crazily in all directions showing blue and brown in various parts of the PFD too fast to comprehend and the sim slamming back and forth against it's stops. Amazingly the sim recovered after ten seconds and I think I lost almost 20,000 feet and another 3-5,000 during the pull out, but it didn't recover because of what I did as there was no way for the brain to process any information in order to determine my situation. It was so violent and disorienting I couldn't tell if it was spinning left or right or I was in some kind of Lomcevak (tumble). I've done spins before as a CFI and some acro in a Decathelon, but this recovery had to have been a fluke.

Point being, this is one situation in transport catagory aircraft that you AVOID and not recover from. Of course, that's the point of a stick pusher.
Just thought this was interesting. I was told at Coex that the data they got for our CAE sims for the E145 was done with one of our aircraft for a month or so. A lot of it was taxing around the airport and then of course they took it airborne and did all of the maneuvers. Except that the CAE folks wanted to do a stall with the SPS deactivated. The check airman refused so another one did it. Well, evidently you are a test pilot at that point, the airplane rolled hard and dropped and the ride evidently was nothing short of horrific.

When we did actual aircraft training on the E145 I got to take it to the shaker and pusher at 15,000. It was awesome. It pushes hard and fast and we really put it in to a nose up attitude and let it go. Even still, I remember the altitude drop not being significant.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 09:56 AM
  #42  
Works harder not smarter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 142
Default

Love the small print 'Forgot to Bid'! Lehman Bothers!?! Ha!! Classic... Appreciate the post.
yawdamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PearlPilot
Your Photos and Videos
12
08-21-2010 09:04 AM
Splanky
Union Talk
6
02-15-2009 06:38 AM
TruthSleuth
Major
82
01-16-2009 08:19 AM
Longbow64
Hangar Talk
19
12-06-2008 03:59 PM
utedrummer
Regional
32
10-18-2008 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices