Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

The problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2009, 10:56 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

ASA had a -700 sim ride..... RAH made SOME of the applicants fly some desk top POS.... I had never even used one like that and did fine.... pretty easy actually.....

I would bet most dont use a sim due to the cost involved.....

fwiw... when i was interviewed and hired in 1992 with AE....we flew a citation II sim during our interview.....
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:12 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: erb
Posts: 646
Default

outstanding post skybolt...wish we had the power to make you the new speaker of the house.
Herman is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:22 AM
  #43  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,723
Default

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks View Post

Good post, Skybolt. Almost any certification and training process will allow a few incapable people to slip by. I am thinking of an F-14 crash in the southeast during the early 90's. The pilot had been visiting family and decided to show them a max climb. He pulled a lot of G's climbing more or less straight up into an overcast. He lost situational awareness and control of the aircraft. His RIO had control of the ejection seats but was blacked out due to G-LOC and did not punch them out. The aircraft crashed and both were killed. This was the second aircraft this pilot had crashed due to poor judgement.

The Dash Whisperer
I believe that particular driver was a former RIO. A little hot dog overconfidence. Another guy almost did the same in LBB or AMA can't remember (besides thinking what a d*p******), but limped back with one shut down.

The point...can happen anytime, anywhere, to anyone.
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:31 AM
  #44  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default Complacency

Originally Posted by Skyone View Post
Skyhigh, you must be inhaling too much of your dirt bike fumes. I assume that this was all tongue in cheek. Remember, two over 60s can't fly together. And can you give me one 121 accident that has been advanced age related? Think Sully-late 50s, Al Haynes (UAL232) very late 50s. I believe both of those gents did a "fair" job of their situations despite being old and barely able to function in the cockpit. But again, I will take your post as a bit tongue in cheek. Right?
I didn't remember that two over 60 can not fly together.

Skybolt mentioned that there is an "envelope" of optimum performance. So far all we have discussed is the lower end of the spectrum. Complacency is not necessarily related to age just as capacity for the job is not necessary related to experience however they are related, and there have been plenty of accidents blamed on complacent pilots.

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:42 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 53
Default

"I didn't remember that two over 60 can not fly together."


Thank God. That will save thousands of lives.
Someone remind me, how old were the pilots that overflew Hilo a few years back?
loungelzrd is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:33 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh View Post
I didn't remember that two over 60 can not fly together.

Skybolt mentioned that there is an "envelope" of optimum performance. So far all we have discussed is the lower end of the spectrum. Complacency is not necessarily related to age just as capacity for the job is not necessary related to experience however they are related, and there have been plenty of accidents blamed on complacent pilots.

Skyhigh
skyhigh, I mentioned nothing about complacency. My position is related to pilot skills. A skilled pilot may get complacent, but he/she does possess the skills to do the job. The complacent pilot needs motivation, which is a whole other issue.

These recent accidents are pointing to the conclusion that pilots who enter the 121 arena at around the 250 hour mark just don't have the skills to succeed when the chips are down.
skybolt is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 03:07 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by Skyone View Post
Think Sully-late 50s, Al Haynes (UAL232) very late 50s. I believe both of those gents did a "fair" job of their situations despite being old and barely able to function in the cockpit.
Don't forget Captain Dave Cronin, who retired within a few months of the following event that he successfully handled.

"United Airlines Flight 811 experienced a cargo door failure in flight on Friday, 24 February 1989, after its last stopover at Honolulu International Airport, Hawaii. The resulting decompression blew out several rows of seats, killing 9 passengers."
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 03:52 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Stretch 8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Retired
Posts: 60
Default

United Airlines Flight 811 -

It doesn't get much worse than that one. Night; overwater; two engines out on one side; a nearly grossed out 747; hole in the side; etc. An example of supperb airmanship getting that thing back on the ground. They were dumpin' fuel on landing !!
Stretch 8 is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 05:20 AM
  #49  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

From my own experience I see two types of pilots. The first type are pilots that actually fly the plane, and I don't mean with autopilot off. The first type are pilots who make the airplane do what they want. The second type are reactionary pilots, i.e. if a parameter is off, they fix it using whatever method possible. The second type are not proactive in flying but reactive. A great example of the second type would be, I was flying a plane with the autopilot differed and the guy was chasing the needle on the ILS. I asked what heading he was flying for the approach, there was no answer. CFI's, Military, Single pilot IFR, fly the airplane, the other let the airplane fly them.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 05:37 AM
  #50  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default It would be nice

Originally Posted by skybolt View Post
skyhigh, I mentioned nothing about complacency. My position is related to pilot skills. A skilled pilot may get complacent, but he/she does possess the skills to do the job. The complacent pilot needs motivation, which is a whole other issue.

These recent accidents are pointing to the conclusion that pilots who enter the 121 arena at around the 250 hour mark just don't have the skills to succeed when the chips are down.
It would be nice if every crew were at their peak but the reality is that some people are better than others. We all have good days and bad days. A 250 hour FO is not ideal but it seems to be good enough most of the time. If an extreme situation were to happen it would be best to have Chuck Yeager and Howard Hughes up front but the reality is that the airlines can get by on a daily basis with much less.

It seems to me that anyone who has the drive to become a Chuck Yeager would not be interested in burning up their days in the front of a modern airliner anyway. It takes someone with a special set of traits to be able to be able to drone along for years of doing the same thing every day over and over without getting bored silly.

In the airlines there are no points given for working harder than the next guy. Natural talent is wasted in the seniority list system. The airlines create and reward the average. Pilots are only motivated to pass the next proficiency check. Their skills and abilities are narrowed down to exactly what they need to get by.

From my experience the airlines do not prefer to hire ex-crop dusters or African bush pilots. They want people who have a long and stable career of doing the same thing everyday. You don't have to be good in order to be a successful airline pilot just good enough.

SKyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kasserine06
Military
25
03-20-2009 03:04 AM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
luv2pilot172
Flight Schools and Training
7
10-01-2008 07:18 PM
8Lpearlchannel
Regional
6
09-02-2008 04:35 PM
Dan64456
Hangar Talk
2
08-15-2008 09:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices