Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
US Airways to sell off E-190s >

US Airways to sell off E-190s

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

US Airways to sell off E-190s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2009, 12:54 PM
  #101  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92 View Post
You have contributed greatly with your 5,111 posts. That is what goes on in these forums. People post news, the news is discussed, and then people speculate on what the news will result in. Of course people will be wrong looking into the future. I like to hear (or read) what people have to say about what can or might happen.
Speculation and discussion are one thing. Statements of fact with no backing are another.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 02:19 PM
  #102  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
Speculation and discussion are one thing. Statements of fact with no backing are another.

TD,

When has anybody in this thread implied that anything was other then speculation?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 02:53 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
G-Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by FlyinPiker View Post
The 175 aircraft I am talking about are currently being used to fulfill the DCI contract and could hypothetically be transferred.
I still do not see how this could happen. Are you suggesting that DAL takes the 175s from RAH? Or is RAH going to give them up voluntarily? Please elaborate.
G-Dog is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 03:37 PM
  #104  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by G-Dog View Post
I still do not see how this could happen. Are you suggesting that DAL takes the 175s from RAH? Or is RAH going to give them up voluntarily? Please elaborate.
I believe the implication is that RAH would make a transaction involving the E175's. I don't think any DAL guys think or are implying that DAL will simply take the Shuttle America DCI E175s & give them to Compass. I really don't think that is even an option.

Many of us are spewing pure speculation. It's not intended to stir the pot IMO.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 04:54 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I believe the implication is that RAH would make a transaction involving the E175's. I don't think any DAL guys think or are implying that DAL will simply take the Shuttle America DCI E175s & give them to Compass. I really don't think that is even an option.

Many of us are spewing pure speculation. It's not intended to stir the pot IMO.
Just remember, CPZ can only operate 36 jets over 86,000lbs. The carve out was for "jets that had already been ordered".

IF and that is a real big "IF", CPZ gets E-175's previously owned by RAH in some weird kind of airline 3-way:

They cannot be certificated over 86,000lbs MGTOW. If the RAH jets have been modded as some allegedly think, then they MUST BE FLOWN BY DAL PILOTS!
shiznit is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:01 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
Speculation and discussion are one thing. Statements of fact with no backing are another.
What if you state for a fact that you are speculating?
newKnow is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:19 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
Speculation and discussion are one thing. Statements of fact with no backing are another.

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
No offense but this company is moving in the direction of Ejets. DAL doesn't own them and there's no way they're going to Compass.

Stated as a fact, but in the end just hopeful speculation.

We all openly admit we are guessing here and there has been some pretty good discussion about what everyone has or will be able to gain by working deals with each other.

It's different when possible outcomes of the discussion might directly negatively effect you though. I think that's why you see so many more non-Republic/Airways/F9/Midwest types participating on this thread.
FlyinPiker is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 07:59 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by FlyinPiker View Post
Stated as a fact, but in the end just hopeful speculation.

We all openly admit we are guessing here and there has been some pretty good discussion about what everyone has or will be able to gain by working deals with each other.

It's different when possible outcomes of the discussion might directly negatively effect you though. I think that's why you see so many more non-Republic/Airways/F9/Midwest types participating on this thread.
Who's Airways? Did Repubic buy them too?
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:53 AM
  #109  
#WEDAT
 
Burn Notice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: 717a
Posts: 286
Default

Sorry, just getting caught up from a few days off. So, in complete and utter speculation Rightseat Ballast wrote:

If you watch what Bedford is doing, he appears to be buying up a comprehensive route structure in the Midwestern US. Assuming both the F9 and YX deals are completed, RAH will have independent hubs in Denver, kansas City, and Milwaukee. Add to that a strong presence in Indianapolis and Columbus (and to some degree St. Loius), and it seems that Bedford is gunning to enter the market at the dominant airline for Midwesterners to fly on. It is a smaller market, and is generally underserved (excluding Chicago) by the rest of the industry. For travelers looking for point to point or delay-free service within the Midwest, RAH will offer a compelling option. For any major carrier that wants to access that market share, a codesharing agreement would be mutually beneficial. This is why I think Bedford has gotten the blessing of his major parnters, and why his actions are not seen as being threatening. The only carriers gunning for MKE are Airtran and Southwest, two airlines that RAH does not have a relationship with. Everyone who deals with RAH is just sitting on the sidelines. By keeping the Shuttle America contract, Delta is quietly funding an (albeit minor) effort to take money away from Airtran and Southwest, two of the more established threats to the legacy carriers. The only bigger worries out there are Allegient and Spirit, but it will be another decade before those two make mainline pilots cry over their beers.

I think(once again, purely speculative) that Southwest is really being overlooked as the main competitor for RAH in this instance. For point to point/delay free service in the midwest I would think Southwest owns that market since that is the core fundamentals that got them started. They are cutting capacity in other parts of their route structure but continue to beef up Denver. They own Midway and St. Louis. The rest of the midwest is underserved because the traffic just isn't there. I don't think DAL will tolerate RAH as competition just to stifle LUV or AAI because that would just be funding RAH's war chest when they eventually go head to head. Further muddying the waters, is DAL/NWA still considering MKE a focus city? I know they were pretty aggressive there before.

And finally, I don't cry over my beers. It dilutes them, so I make sure to lean to one side when I cry.
Burn Notice is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:53 AM
  #110  
#WEDAT
 
Burn Notice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: 717a
Posts: 286
Default

..................Double post

Last edited by Burn Notice; 07-29-2009 at 07:55 AM. Reason: Double post
Burn Notice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
cactiboss
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
04-16-2009 07:56 AM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices