Lee Moak's stance on scope and unity.
#121
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
If so, I would be onboard.
#122
Shiz - they are full members of their LEC and are represented by their reps, just like you and I are. In some cases we share the same reps (depending on base).
If we worked to extend our list below us, they would be Delta pilots and their aircraft Delta jets. Under a single list they would share our same interests and want Delta to grow. Like you and me, they would be more pleased with 777 orders than E175 orders. Like you and me, they would want tighter scope. There would be no conflict of interest because we would be one. We would stand at the table together.
Instead our MEC voted to further divide us, a path which will lead to conflict. They will try to break our contract and they just might be able to do it. Delta pilots who flow down to Compass will now no longer be able to enjoy Representation as Delta pilots. We junior guys now face a very real risk of being left out of future merger integration - like the US Air guys were.
Again, it was a misguided vote. It was probably done to enable a management transaction involving Compass, or simply to wash our hands of ugly bargaining involving aircraft "we don't want to fly."
It was a vote done based on insider politics and went against the desires of the Delta pilots, as demonstrated by numerous resolutions at the local level.
If we worked to extend our list below us, they would be Delta pilots and their aircraft Delta jets. Under a single list they would share our same interests and want Delta to grow. Like you and me, they would be more pleased with 777 orders than E175 orders. Like you and me, they would want tighter scope. There would be no conflict of interest because we would be one. We would stand at the table together.
Instead our MEC voted to further divide us, a path which will lead to conflict. They will try to break our contract and they just might be able to do it. Delta pilots who flow down to Compass will now no longer be able to enjoy Representation as Delta pilots. We junior guys now face a very real risk of being left out of future merger integration - like the US Air guys were.
Again, it was a misguided vote. It was probably done to enable a management transaction involving Compass, or simply to wash our hands of ugly bargaining involving aircraft "we don't want to fly."
It was a vote done based on insider politics and went against the desires of the Delta pilots, as demonstrated by numerous resolutions at the local level.
DPA is closer and closer every time stuff like this happens.
#123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
If we worked to extend our list below us, they would be Delta pilots and their aircraft Delta jets. Under a single list they would share our same interests and want Delta to grow. Like you and me, they would be more pleased with 777 orders than E175 orders. Like you and me, they would want tighter scope. There would be no conflict of interest because we would be one. We would stand at the table together.
You have never articulated a concrete, workable plan to accomplish "extend(ing) our list below us."
Are you just going in to management and demand it? Suggest it? Cajole it? Where is your leverage today? We are where we are. How do you get to where you want to be?
How can you force management to take 335+ pilots and a separate company onto our list, with all the contractual and cost differences? What of the rest of the CPZ structure? Where does it go? If you were to succeed in getting CPZ on the list, what happens to the aircraft limitations of Section 1? Why would management bend on what's already in the book? How do you derive your inclusive scope, yet avoid the whipsaw of 76 seat flying at the bottom of the now Delta list? Where is your leverage today?
Along the way, how are you going to merge Compass onto our list? DOH? Staple? Who is going to represent those pilots in that integration? There's at least one CPZ pilot that has an opinion on his representation by the Delta MEC that doesn't agree with yours.
We've exchanged PM's on this, Bar. Nobody advocating making CPZ pilots Delta pilots has answered the hard questions with other than "hope and change."
#124
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Compass pilots fly Northwest Jets on Northwest Routes receiving Northwest paychecks. If enough people wanted it to happen, I don't think it would be that hard.
#125
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Here's where you start with the "hope and change" thing....
You have never articulated a concrete, workable plan to accomplish "extend(ing) our list below us."
Are you just going in to management and demand it? Suggest it? Cajole it? Where is your leverage today? We are where we are. How do you get to where you want to be?
How can you force management to take 335+ pilots and a separate company onto our list, with all the contractual and cost differences? What of the rest of the CPZ structure? Where does it go? If you were to succeed in getting CPZ on the list, what happens to the aircraft limitations of Section 1? Why would management bend on what's already in the book? How do you derive your inclusive scope, yet avoid the whipsaw of 76 seat flying at the bottom of the now Delta list? Where is your leverage today?
Along the way, how are you going to merge Compass onto our list? DOH? Staple? Who is going to represent those pilots in that integration? There's at least one CPZ pilot that has an opinion on his representation by the Delta MEC that doesn't agree with yours.
We've exchanged PM's on this, Bar. Nobody advocating making CPZ pilots Delta pilots has answered the hard questions with other than "hope and change."
You have never articulated a concrete, workable plan to accomplish "extend(ing) our list below us."
Are you just going in to management and demand it? Suggest it? Cajole it? Where is your leverage today? We are where we are. How do you get to where you want to be?
How can you force management to take 335+ pilots and a separate company onto our list, with all the contractual and cost differences? What of the rest of the CPZ structure? Where does it go? If you were to succeed in getting CPZ on the list, what happens to the aircraft limitations of Section 1? Why would management bend on what's already in the book? How do you derive your inclusive scope, yet avoid the whipsaw of 76 seat flying at the bottom of the now Delta list? Where is your leverage today?
Along the way, how are you going to merge Compass onto our list? DOH? Staple? Who is going to represent those pilots in that integration? There's at least one CPZ pilot that has an opinion on his representation by the Delta MEC that doesn't agree with yours.
We've exchanged PM's on this, Bar. Nobody advocating making CPZ pilots Delta pilots has answered the hard questions with other than "hope and change."
We missed opportunities during the JPWA and again during the settlement of the scope grievance.
We are nearly constantly in some sort of scope negotiation. Fact is, we've NEVER EVEN ASKED THE QUESTION. We don't want unity, have not evaluated it, it is not part of our negotiating agenda.
The problem is not getting the list done. The problem is that we don't want to do it. We did not know the details of the NWA merger, yet we worked out a deal 100 times more complicated than 300 pilots who are already in staple seniority order.
Pilots on the E175 can work it for current rates. If we get a E190/195 then it comes to mainline and we'll have to figure out if we'll work it like we do the MD90, or like the 737-700. It could be done.
#126
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Lists don't normally "extend" without mergers, and then subject to merger policy. Unless of course we strike some sort of agreement. Setting aside the issue of the non-existent merger, how do you envision this "extension"? A staple? An agreement before we jointly petition for a merger?
If so, I would be onboard.
If so, I would be onboard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pan_Am_Express.jpg
#127
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
First, get the CPZ pilots to agree on a staple. I'm guessing you'd have 98% approval. Next, apply for single carrier status or single transportation system (i'm not that familiar).
Compass pilots fly Northwest Jets on Northwest Routes receiving Northwest paychecks. If enough people wanted it to happen, I don't think it would be that hard.
Compass pilots fly Northwest Jets on Northwest Routes receiving Northwest paychecks. If enough people wanted it to happen, I don't think it would be that hard.
ALPA really tried to do the right thing and lost. The precedent that was set is horrible.
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
I can't get the list implemented. Ever. Not without management concurrence and significant changes to our contract. Too say that the question was never asked is not accurate. Management created Compass. Management has grown Compass to its maximum size. 76 seat jet flying was extracted in bankruptcy negotiations by both NWA and DAL management. They are not going to "gift" it back.
That pay scale is one of many reasons management would never acquiesce to an implemented seniority list even if we could prove operational integration (we can't). Why would they give away a cost advantage until they have to? The PAA example you mentioned had signficantly different components, including the financial condition of the carrier involved versus the rest of the industry and economy.
#129
Slow, correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a "B" scale mean to hire those guys on at a lower rate on all of the equipment, not just the E-Jets?
I see this proposal as a graduated step, and or a market rate for the jets, not a B scale.
I see this proposal as a graduated step, and or a market rate for the jets, not a B scale.
#130
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
There's a lot more in cost savings in the Compass book than just pay. Almost every aspect of their book is less expensive.