Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Lee Moak's stance on scope and unity. >

Lee Moak's stance on scope and unity.

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Lee Moak's stance on scope and unity.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2009, 11:10 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
If we worked to extend our list below us, they would be Delta pilots and their aircraft Delta jets.
Lists don't normally "extend" without mergers, and then subject to merger policy. Unless of course we strike some sort of agreement. Setting aside the issue of the non-existent merger, how do you envision this "extension"? A staple? An agreement before we jointly petition for a merger?

If so, I would be onboard.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 11:16 AM
  #122  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Shiz - they are full members of their LEC and are represented by their reps, just like you and I are. In some cases we share the same reps (depending on base).

If we worked to extend our list below us, they would be Delta pilots and their aircraft Delta jets. Under a single list they would share our same interests and want Delta to grow. Like you and me, they would be more pleased with 777 orders than E175 orders. Like you and me, they would want tighter scope. There would be no conflict of interest because we would be one. We would stand at the table together.

Instead our MEC voted to further divide us, a path which will lead to conflict. They will try to break our contract and they just might be able to do it. Delta pilots who flow down to Compass will now no longer be able to enjoy Representation as Delta pilots. We junior guys now face a very real risk of being left out of future merger integration - like the US Air guys were.

Again, it was a misguided vote. It was probably done to enable a management transaction involving Compass, or simply to wash our hands of ugly bargaining involving aircraft "we don't want to fly."

It was a vote done based on insider politics and went against the desires of the Delta pilots, as demonstrated by numerous resolutions at the local level.
If so then these people need to be recalled out of those positions. They were put there to represent the pilots that elected them, not themselves!! These clowns are destroying ALPA by continuing to neglect the pilots they are supposed to represent. What has ALPA done in the last few years to help the industry as a whole? If they keep undermining the profession then its only a matter of time before ALPA self destructs.

DPA is closer and closer every time stuff like this happens.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 12:22 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post

If we worked to extend our list below us, they would be Delta pilots and their aircraft Delta jets. Under a single list they would share our same interests and want Delta to grow. Like you and me, they would be more pleased with 777 orders than E175 orders. Like you and me, they would want tighter scope. There would be no conflict of interest because we would be one. We would stand at the table together.

Here's where you start with the "hope and change" thing....

You have never articulated a concrete, workable plan to accomplish "extend(ing) our list below us."

Are you just going in to management and demand it? Suggest it? Cajole it? Where is your leverage today? We are where we are. How do you get to where you want to be?

How can you force management to take 335+ pilots and a separate company onto our list, with all the contractual and cost differences? What of the rest of the CPZ structure? Where does it go? If you were to succeed in getting CPZ on the list, what happens to the aircraft limitations of Section 1? Why would management bend on what's already in the book? How do you derive your inclusive scope, yet avoid the whipsaw of 76 seat flying at the bottom of the now Delta list? Where is your leverage today?

Along the way, how are you going to merge Compass onto our list? DOH? Staple? Who is going to represent those pilots in that integration? There's at least one CPZ pilot that has an opinion on his representation by the Delta MEC that doesn't agree with yours.

We've exchanged PM's on this, Bar. Nobody advocating making CPZ pilots Delta pilots has answered the hard questions with other than "hope and change."
slowplay is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 01:04 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay View Post
We've exchanged PM's on this, Bar. Nobody advocating making CPZ pilots Delta pilots has answered the hard questions with other than "hope and change."
First, get the CPZ pilots to agree on a staple. I'm guessing you'd have 98% approval. Next, apply for single carrier status or single transportation system (i'm not that familiar).

Compass pilots fly Northwest Jets on Northwest Routes receiving Northwest paychecks. If enough people wanted it to happen, I don't think it would be that hard.
mynameisjim is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 03:41 PM
  #125  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay View Post
Here's where you start with the "hope and change" thing....

You have never articulated a concrete, workable plan to accomplish "extend(ing) our list below us."

Are you just going in to management and demand it? Suggest it? Cajole it? Where is your leverage today? We are where we are. How do you get to where you want to be?

How can you force management to take 335+ pilots and a separate company onto our list, with all the contractual and cost differences? What of the rest of the CPZ structure? Where does it go? If you were to succeed in getting CPZ on the list, what happens to the aircraft limitations of Section 1? Why would management bend on what's already in the book? How do you derive your inclusive scope, yet avoid the whipsaw of 76 seat flying at the bottom of the now Delta list? Where is your leverage today?

Along the way, how are you going to merge Compass onto our list? DOH? Staple? Who is going to represent those pilots in that integration? There's at least one CPZ pilot that has an opinion on his representation by the Delta MEC that doesn't agree with yours.

We've exchanged PM's on this, Bar. Nobody advocating making CPZ pilots Delta pilots has answered the hard questions with other than "hope and change."
Management has already asked the question regarding a single list / merger to facilitate the flow / furlough which both sides admit does not work. Being able to bid through would reduce the training footprint and not be too small a hole to force a 12,700 pilot airline through on the way up and the way down. (management backed off when furloughs were determined not to be an issue for now and we've sure not brought it up again)

We missed opportunities during the JPWA and again during the settlement of the scope grievance.

We are nearly constantly in some sort of scope negotiation. Fact is, we've NEVER EVEN ASKED THE QUESTION. We don't want unity, have not evaluated it, it is not part of our negotiating agenda.

The problem is not getting the list done. The problem is that we don't want to do it. We did not know the details of the NWA merger, yet we worked out a deal 100 times more complicated than 300 pilots who are already in staple seniority order.

Pilots on the E175 can work it for current rates. If we get a E190/195 then it comes to mainline and we'll have to figure out if we'll work it like we do the MD90, or like the 737-700. It could be done.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 03:45 PM
  #126  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
Lists don't normally "extend" without mergers, and then subject to merger policy. Unless of course we strike some sort of agreement. Setting aside the issue of the non-existent merger, how do you envision this "extension"? A staple? An agreement before we jointly petition for a merger?

If so, I would be onboard.
I just flew with a guy who was part of Pan Am when they extended their list down, capturing Ransome (Pan Am Express). Not only has it been done before, we have pilots on our list who were a part of that deal. He spoke very highly of the arrangement. I asked that he call his Rep and talk up what worked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pan_Am_Express.jpg
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 03:52 PM
  #127  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Default

Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post
First, get the CPZ pilots to agree on a staple. I'm guessing you'd have 98% approval. Next, apply for single carrier status or single transportation system (i'm not that familiar).

Compass pilots fly Northwest Jets on Northwest Routes receiving Northwest paychecks. If enough people wanted it to happen, I don't think it would be that hard.
Jim - Slow and Sailing are correct that getting a single carrier filing approved without management agreement is impossible. If curious why, read about how Teamsters and TSA beat up ALPA with GoJets.

ALPA really tried to do the right thing and lost. The precedent that was set is horrible.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 06:13 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Management has already asked the question regarding a single list / merger to facilitate the flow / furlough .
You've stated this before. I've asked around the union side. Nobody can verify your assertion. Nobody that I've talked to has been asked, nor was it offered.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
The problem is not getting the list done. The problem is that we don't want to do it. We did not know the details of the NWA merger, yet we worked out a deal 100 times more complicated than 300 pilots who are already in staple seniority order.
I can get the list done tonight. That takes a word processor. It probably would even pass legal review and we'd only get sued by a few CPZ guys.

I can't get the list implemented. Ever. Not without management concurrence and significant changes to our contract. Too say that the question was never asked is not accurate. Management created Compass. Management has grown Compass to its maximum size. 76 seat jet flying was extracted in bankruptcy negotiations by both NWA and DAL management. They are not going to "gift" it back.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Pilots on the E175 can work it for current rates. If we get a E190/195 then it comes to mainline and we'll have to figure out if we'll work it like we do the MD90, or like the 737-700. It could be done.
We already have an E-190 rate in the book. What I'm reading is that you support a B-scale included on the property. You'll work to fix it later. Is that correct?

That pay scale is one of many reasons management would never acquiesce to an implemented seniority list even if we could prove operational integration (we can't). Why would they give away a cost advantage until they have to? The PAA example you mentioned had signficantly different components, including the financial condition of the carrier involved versus the rest of the industry and economy.
slowplay is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 06:31 PM
  #129  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Slow, correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a "B" scale mean to hire those guys on at a lower rate on all of the equipment, not just the E-Jets?

I see this proposal as a graduated step, and or a market rate for the jets, not a B scale.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 06:35 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Slow, correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a "B" scale mean to hire those guys on at a lower rate on all of the equipment, not just the E-Jets?

I see this proposal as a graduated step, and or a market rate for the jets, not a B scale.
We did this once before at Delta Express (Sunshine) in 1996. While you're correct that it's not a B-scale, the Express guys called it a "C" scale. We expended significant negotiating capital changing the pay and rules during C2K, and that began the demise of the operation. Compass would be strikingly similar, except that it doesn't move Captains seats currently on mainline behind mainline guys.

There's a lot more in cost savings in the Compass book than just pay. Almost every aspect of their book is less expensive.
slowplay is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices