Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Facts - NTSB Re: NWA 188 >

Facts - NTSB Re: NWA 188

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Facts - NTSB Re: NWA 188

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2009, 06:20 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
It was not a misfortune, or fotuitous event that lead this incident. It was the crews choice to violate company SOPs and FARs, fly over one hour without radio communications, and betray the trust of the passengers, cabin crew, and the company that employed them.
You sound more like a personal injury attorney than a pilot.
satchip is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:24 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
What would you recommend the punishment befitting the infractionfor using computers, which happens to be a direct violation of a company SOP?

Once again, I'll qualify my statement by admitting that I know Rick (the FO). But, the more this thread progresses, the more I want to defend them. Mainly because many of you have switched your story on why you condemn them.

They admit that they were using their computers, which I grant was wrong. But, what if they had their computers out to go over new company procedures? What if they had them out to go over A-320 systems? I don't think they did in this case (they had them out to figure out the new bidding process).

But, let's not forget that it was just a few days ago that many of you condemned them because there was no way that they could have been discussing company policy for that long. Discussing the new bid process is more related to company policy than a lot of things I have seen being done on some airplanes.

New K Now
newKnow is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:32 AM
  #123  
Line Holder
 
ratsnrip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 56
Wink

Originally Posted by satchip View Post
You sound more like a personal injury attorney than a pilot.
It occurred to me the other day when he refused to identify the company he flew for- he writes with the style that reminds me of lawyer "speak". That and the occasional reference to specific lawyers. Clarence Darrow, etc.

Hmmm... I guess you never really know who you are listening to! I hope the reporters trolling these boards realize that they don't know who they are quoting.
ratsnrip is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:42 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,929
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Once again, I'll qualify my statement by admitting that I know Rick (the FO). But, the more this thread progresses, the more I want to defend them. Mainly because many of you have switched your story on why you condemn them.
I don't doubt your friend's personality or virtues. Infact I'm sure he will appreciate any support a friend can give... and I am very sincere about that.

But, let's not forget that it was just a few days ago that many of you condemned them because there was no way that they could have been discussing company policy for that long. Discussing the new bid process is more related to company policy than a lot of things I have seen being done on some airplanes.

New K Now
The condemnation is not primary to the use of laptops... but proximate to the loss of situational awareness by a current and qualified crew, and lack of regard for company procedures and FAA.
captjns is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:43 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,929
Default

Originally Posted by ratsnrip View Post
It occurred to me the other day when he refused to identify the company he flew for- he writes with the style that reminds me of lawyer "speak". That and the occasional reference to specific lawyers. Clarence Darrow, etc.

Hmmm... I guess you never really know who you are listening to! I hope the reporters trolling these boards realize that they don't know who they are quoting.
Pick an airline... any airline.
captjns is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:52 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

FWIW,

I think they had a manual leg in the FMS with a resulting white line that stretched on forever.

They aren't the first pilots to miss a frequency change, and they won't be the last. Don't know if they simply missed it, or if the controller waited too long to give it to them.

ACARS, not a 320 pilot but I do know that the ACARS chime is turned off during certain phases\times of flight for the 300 and I assume the same logic holds true for the newer airplane.

Guard. I believe it is likely they had it tuned but at a volume so low that they simply couldn't hear it.

They aren't the first pilots to lose SA and they won't be the last. Losing your SA is very insidious. Especially when you are convinced you still have it. And human perceptions of time, especially time we are spending in a given task aren't reliable. We may think we are doing something very frequently, but, an actual tape might indicate the exact opposite. How many times have all of us started something that will only take a couple of minutes then realized that we spent 10, 20, or 30 minutes on it (Just taking a quick look at APC is definitely an example for me)

Do they deserve time off? Definitely. Do they deserve to be fired for using a computer in the cockpit? Not in my opinion.

Would my opinion be different if they had a low fuel warning and tried to cover it up by pressing to the destination only to flame out versus landing at a closer airport. You betcha.

Would my opinion be different if they were using a computer, reading, soduki, etc, during the arrival? Or even just cruising below 10k. You betch.

But they weren't. They got into a discussion 5 miles above the earth. No doubt in my mind that they cross checked their altitude\aspd\engine instruments periodically. No doubt in my mind that they thought they knew where they were.
As best as I can determine from the statements in the press and the video of the FO, they fessed up immediately. Didn't try to come up with some BS story of an aircraft malfunction. Requested to be tested for drugs/alcohol.

Probably as upset with their own performance as some on this board are.
kronan is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:09 AM
  #127  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post

ACARS, not a 320 pilot but I do know that the ACARS chime is turned off during certain phases\times of flight for the 300 and I assume the same logic holds true for the newer airplane.

.
In our bus's there is no chime with the ACARS. You only get a message on the ecam that flashes "company message"
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:15 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

Gotta love those engineers
kronan is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:19 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
In our bus's there is no chime with the ACARS. You only get a message on the ecam that flashes "company message"
Bet they'll figure out how to install the chime, now...
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:23 AM
  #130  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 25
Default

How far have we fallen as professional pilots where you can even start to defend these two weakest links? You want to have your laptops out discussing a new bidding system? Fine. But to lose all sa, completely lost in your own world at 370 while doing it, not fine. Come on guys, unless these two were sleeping, which I still believe they were, the only responsibility they should have from now on should be deciding who does the fries and who does the burgers.
homer j is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 12:04 PM
sailingfun
Mergers and Acquisitions
47
03-02-2010 01:35 PM
Nosmo King
Mergers and Acquisitions
81
12-30-2008 10:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices