Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AA, AE merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010 | 09:15 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
It doesn't really matter what the pay scale for an RJ or ATR at AA would be.

Because the RJ or ATR would be at AA!

Imagine NOT having to start over after a 5-15 year 'career' at a regional. Imagine all flying being recaptured at a mainline. It puts the scope genie back in the bottle. Its worth going back to the gawd forsaken B scale to undo that mess.

Staple, fence off the AE Capt seats, (one AE capt goes to a MD FO seat, one AA FO can go to an AE Capt seat), and who's not happy?


I tell you what, since you have that shiny big metal syndrome. You work and give me your paychek. What makes you think an AA F/O has the right to be an AE capt and why should an AE capt be an AA f/o, so mainline pilots can be in the driver seat? Dont think so. I do not need the feel of that big jet as you do. I dont need to sell myself short to make it better for some mainline bottom guy.
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 09:22 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AceOnTheRiver
These rumors are from the proposal for a PanAm style master list. The plan is to staple AA on the bottom of AE's list and then staple AE on the bottom of AA's list. The pay scale change on transfer is to alleviate AMR's concern on cost. The scope clause would be adjusted to give AMR more flexibility, but it wouldn't open the flood gates on the RJ's. The reason to adjust the scope would be to entice AMR to sign off on the proposal. I have also heard that this will not happen till the flow throughs move to AA because of the lawsuit liability and obvious seniority issues. I think this is a smart way to get rid of the infighting and scope issues and I will support the proposal.
For your info, the lawsuits will happen. There is no way AMR is going to get away from it. Flow through, majority do not want to exercise their right to go. If AE/AMR forces or terminates anyone of them the suits will begin and they will draw APA and AA into it. So if they want to do the PAN AM style, which was discussed 12 years ago but APA balked at it, then just do it. The law suits will be if anyone of the flow throughs are forced or terminated.
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 11:28 PM
  #43  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
and who's not happy?
Ummmmmmmmmmmm....... how about the military guy who now needs to fly a ATR/ERJ for $21 bucks an hr. It would mean the end of military pilots at AA. With a large part of the AA list ex military, I don't see them allowing this to happen.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 12:43 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default Aa/ae

Originally Posted by buddies8
For your info, the lawsuits will happen. There is no way AMR is going to get away from it. Flow through, majority do not want to exercise their right to go. If AE/AMR forces or terminates anyone of them the suits will begin and they will draw APA and AA into it. So if they want to do the PAN AM style, which was discussed 12 years ago but APA balked at it, then just do it. The law suits will be if anyone of the flow throughs are forced or terminated.
I may be wrong,but I understand it is AE/ALPA that wants the Captains at AE
to flow? Someone answer this. What happens to the 2000 pilots on furlough at AA if there was a merger? Look at the LLC. fences at AA now and see if that will work for ya. Who will be protected? Not the FO's at AE. Can you say,
furlough fodder.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 03:49 AM
  #45  
atpcliff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Hi!

TONS of mil guys are ALREADY going to straight to the regionals, for years, as there has not been many major jobs lately!

cliff
NBO
PS-I know a LOT of mil guys that went to Mesa, as that was their best option at the time.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 04:11 AM
  #46  
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Default

One of the main reasons for the screwed up system we have now is to accommodate the military pilots who felt it was below them to fly a turboprop.

Get over it. You're just not that special. The entry level position at every airline should have been right seat in an ATR or a RJ.

If you can't see what a future airline career is worth, then take a pass. This is America.

Originally Posted by Beantown
Ummmmmmmmmmmm....... how about the military guy who now needs to fly a ATR/ERJ for $21 bucks an hr. It would mean the end of military pilots at AA. With a large part of the AA list ex military, I don't see them allowing this to happen.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 04:33 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
One of the main reasons for the screwed up system we have now is to accommodate the military pilots who felt it was below them to fly a turboprop.

Get over it. You're just not that special. The entry level position at every airline should have been right seat in an ATR or a RJ.

If you can't see what a future airline career is worth, then take a pass. This is America.
Well said. As a regional guy, nothing raises my BP faster than to have some mainline guy lecture me (as if it were my idea, and my fault) that it was unwise and short-sighted to allow RJ's to be flown for peanuts by some clowns on another seniority list. That decision was already made, by mainline egos, long before I even contemplated this industry.

The genie is out of the bottle; now what?
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 05:30 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default

I heard AMR is in talks with Lynx. Rumor has it that Eagle's ATR's are pretty long in the tooth, and a turn key Q400 fleet gives AMR a fresh fleet update. APA supposedly has not objected to this on an airframe for airframe swap. And, Lynx pilots stay with the aircraft. It will be operated on a capacity purchase agreement with republic. AMR gets a turn key -staffed- fleet to grow up to the number of ATR's on the property!
Don't shoot the messenger!!!
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 05:52 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: DFW A320 FO
Default

Interesting, and would probably be smart from a mgmt standpoint. Has too many scope provision problems though. The contract carrier taking over hub flying at Eagle grievance would be extremely relevant here (and that's assuming you could get the APA to sign off on Q400s w/ significantly more seats than the ATRs). Who knows when that grievance will be resolved.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 06:28 AM
  #50  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Beantown
Ummmmmmmmmmmm....... how about the military guy who now needs to fly a ATR/ERJ for $21 bucks an hr. It would mean the end of military pilots at AA. With a large part of the AA list ex military, I don't see them allowing this to happen.
Going into the military to fly is a CAREER CHOICE. It is not the responsibility of an airline or airline pilot union to cater to persons who chose a DIFFERENT CAREER than that of an "airline pilot".

I have 10 years of airline experience, should I join the ANG and automatically be a Major or Lt. Col. as a plane commander?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
olympic
Foreign
3
02-23-2010 11:43 PM
texaspilot76
Major
111
09-11-2009 12:58 PM
flyguy1
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
04-01-2009 03:32 AM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices