Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2013 | 07:55 PM
  #8221  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Never said that either. I just said this:



Carl
Cost neutral. Another doughnut talking point. You take one statement, and enshrine it on your golden tablet.
Reply
Old 11-12-2013 | 08:05 PM
  #8222  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Cost neutral. Another doughnut talking point. You take one statement, and enshrine it on your golden tablet.
No, a direct quote from Bastian and Anderson during an investors call. Care to continue making a fool of yourself?

Carl
Reply
Old 11-12-2013 | 08:18 PM
  #8223  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No, a direct quote from Bastian and Anderson during an investors call. Care to continue making a fool of yourself?

Carl

Quote the entire statement.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 03:34 AM
  #8224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Quote the entire statement.
T, why do you bother? They pick and choose at random which quotes they like. "It's a cost neutral contract" taken out of context sticks but "we will pay the mx costs for the RJ's instead of 717's" doesn't. You must enjoy beating your head against the wall...
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 04:09 AM
  #8225  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You guys clearly despise anything that makes us look like other than perfection. DAL88driver wasn't nearly as tough on us as I was.

Again, nobody had a company that's more financially successful and in a better position than us with C2012. Nobody. We had a chance to demand an industry leading contract in every way. Even if it was just marginally leading. Instead we settled for COLA pay raises fully funded by concessions in other areas, while adding 70 additional 76 seat RJ's. in my opinion, we blew it. We took the very first offer from management before Section 6 even began.

We may not have gotten help from the others, but no other union was in a better position to lead than us. We squandered that opportunity and hurt the rest of the pilot profession in the process.

Carl
OK Carl, what would you have done? What bargaining leverage did we have? Be VERY specific.

"Just say no" would have us stalemated through at least middle of next year. With the direct compensation increase, increased credit and reserve changes I'm ~ 25% above where I was pre C12 (backed out longevity) although my relative seniority in base has gotten worse.* I clearly credit more time now.

FWIW, I voted NO. But, the RJ deal was leverage and for what it was, it was used to good effect.

* I'm guessing it will take another two years to reach my pre merger base + equipment career apogee.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 05:28 AM
  #8226  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
T, why do you bother? They pick and choose at random which quotes they like. "It's a cost neutral contract" taken out of context sticks but "we will pay the mx costs for the RJ's instead of 717's" doesn't. You must enjoy beating your head against the wall...

Yeah you are right. I just can't let him using his half truths for his propaganda go unchecked.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 05:54 AM
  #8227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Yeah you are right. I just can't let him using his half truths for his propaganda go unchecked.
Just as ALPA tends to shoot themselves in the foot, the same it is with Carl. The more half truths, mis truths, backwards logic and just plain old hypocritical musings he posts the more damage he does to his cause.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 05:55 AM
  #8228  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
OK Carl, what would you have done? What bargaining leverage did we have? Be VERY specific.
More than you think (or are willing to admit). This isn't the place to discuss it. And I think you know that.

There is a very simple concept in business that has been proven to be true time after time after time. Employees are your greatest asset. To view employees as strictly a "cost item" and especially to treat them poorly does not usually turn out to be a strategy for success. (Not unless you have someone like DALPA running interference for you.)

We're being paid as if our company was on the verge of bankruptcy... at a time when our company is making billions in profits.

Anyway, here's some more food for thought on the subject:

Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 06:59 AM
  #8229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No, a direct quote from Bastian and Anderson during an investors call. Care to continue making a fool of yourself?

Carl
Yes cost neutral for the company, maybe. Cost neutral for the pilots? No. It adds about a billion dollars to the total valuation of the PWA over the life of the agreement.

What allows Delta to make that statement is the savings realized in engine overhauls on 50 seat jet and airframes as well as lease valuations. Do not forget that Delta also got out of many of these 50 seat leases with 739 and 321 purchases. That is how they can state "cost neutral" as a whole for the investor community. There is a difference that you fail to either see or admit. Talking points to investors are a lot different than money in your pocket.

Make it easier Carl, has you pay and total package gone up since the TA?
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 07:05 AM
  #8230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
More than you think (or are willing to admit). This isn't the place to discuss it. And I think you know that.

There is a very simple concept in business that has been proven to be true time after time after time. Employees are your greatest asset. To view employees as strictly a "cost item" and especially to treat them poorly does not usually turn out to be a strategy for success. (Not unless you have someone like DALPA running interference for you.)

We're being paid as if our company was on the verge of bankruptcy... at a time when our company is making billions in profits.

Anyway, here's some more food for thought on the subject:


Don't forget that you hang your hat on a ALPA negotiated contract; C2K.

Its easy to state that you just say no and the company will quiver. I submit that if that is tried the pilots will have pitchforks due to lack of results. It may be where DALPA goes but time will only tell. A middle of the road is probably preferred by a great majority.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices