Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2013 | 10:11 AM
  #8241  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
More than you think (or are willing to admit). This isn't the place to discuss it. And I think you know that.

There is a very simple concept in business that has been proven to be true time after time after time. Employees are your greatest asset. To view employees as strictly a "cost item" and especially to treat them poorly does not usually turn out to be a strategy for success. (Not unless you have someone like DALPA running interference for you.)

We're being paid as if our company was on the verge of bankruptcy... at a time when our company is making billions in profits.
What?

You constantly use SWA pilots as a gold standard. SWA pilots have never exceeded the C2K contract. Or IPA's contract. And they absolutely are treated like a cost item. Otherwise they would be paid so much more. Right? So I guess you can't use them as a standard anymore.

Or UPS pilots. Management decided that the size of their pilot group cost too much, so they furloughed a number of them and let management pilots pick up the slack. So you can't use them as a standard anymore either. Forget what they get paid.

And what pilot at Delta gets treated poorly? Honestly. How can you even attempt to use these things as an argument?
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 10:15 AM
  #8242  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
So it's your position that we should never say "no," that we need to say "yes" to everything the company offers.

Sounds like a sound negotiating strategy.
Nope. Because DALPA has said no. They said it over 100 times before the TA was released to MEMRAT. The day a TA was agreed on was the day management FINALLY gave up on wanting all 76 seaters converted to 80 seats and every 76 seat frame thereafter to be configured to 82 seats. They argued that the number of seats didn't hurt us. Why would we care? It's the same airframe regardless.

But hey, DALPA just says YES to everything.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 10:17 AM
  #8243  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The entire statement was discussing all the good things the new pilot contract would bring to Delta Air Lines. Ed and Richard went on to say that the new pilot contract would be cost neutral, and in fact, the additional cost savings would allow Delta to FUND other employee initiatives within OTHER employee groups at Delta.

When these comments came to light, our DTW LEC put them out in a letter to us along with the MEC administration's extreme displeasure at management for making public statements like that. What really made O'Malley mad is that Richard and Ed made those comments before the vote was taken.

So that's the context tsquare. Still want to keep changing the subject and making a fool of yourself?

Carl

That's not providing the entire quote. Or even a portion of the quote.

Last edited by johnso29; 11-13-2013 at 10:47 AM.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 10:18 AM
  #8244  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Dorfman
Will there be an announcement for a vote by 1 Jan, for some on APC the self imposed deadline? If not when? I feel if there is not a vote soon then this becomes anever ending card drive by DPA with no true end game in site other than to be a thorn in the side of DALPA.

I do believe that DPA has been good for shedding light into the dark corners of DALPA, but at some point there either has to be a vote or they need to end the campaign.

Unlikely. DPA doesn't have enough active cards now, so they likely won't by then either.

Last edited by johnso29; 11-13-2013 at 10:48 AM.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 10:53 AM
  #8245  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 378
Likes: 5
Default

[QUOTE=DAL 88 Driver;1519017]More than you think (or are willing to admit). This isn't the place to discuss it. And I think you know that that[QUOTE]

Why? Dont you advocate for the release of survey results? I understand this is a public webboard but you don't think that sending survey results out to pilots would be secure either do you?
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 11:49 AM
  #8246  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
They said it over 100 times before the TA was released to MEMRAT. The day a TA was agreed on was the day management FINALLY gave up on wanting all 76 seaters converted to 80 seats and every 76 seat frame thereafter to be configured to 82 seats.
I thought you were a big "fact" guy. But I'm not seeing any verifiable facts there, nothing corroborated by anyone else. . So far as I can tell, you are the only one who has ever pushed this interpretation of the "facts."

I could pull a bunch of pie-in-the-sky anecdotes out of my @ss and pass them off as "facts" to back up my argument, too. But then I'd be a delusional cheerleader.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 12:01 PM
  #8247  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
I thought you were a big "fact" guy. But I'm not seeing any verifiable facts there, nothing corroborated by anyone else. . So far as I can tell, you are the only one who has ever pushed this interpretation of the "facts."

I could pull a bunch of pie-in-the-sky anecdotes out of my @ss and pass them off as "facts" to back up my argument, too. But then I'd be a delusional cheerleader.
My facts are straight out of the mouths of our negotiators. I have spent hours talking to them. The 100 number comes from a union publication. If you choose not to believe those sources, that's on you.

In typical Carl/PD style, you break out the insults once you're proven wrong. Stay classy.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 12:01 PM
  #8248  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue24
No, you need to look beyond the simplistic soundbite. We need to think outside the box, and find ways to get returns for our pilots in a relatively timely manner if possible. Big difference and one that employs strategic mindset and action.
Wow, that sounds really great! Lots of feel-good buzzwords and psychobabble bull****. Yes! Let's think outside the box!

Wait...how did that work out for us on C12?

As for me, I'll just slide back into the nice, tight box.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 12:09 PM
  #8249  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Wow, that sounds really great! Lots of feel-good buzzwords and psychobabble bull****. Yes! Let's think outside the box!

Wait...how did that work out for us on C12?

As for me, I'll just slide back into the nice, tight box.
Awesome PD. But before you slide back into that little box how about you lay down how DPA is gonna get it done. Tell us. Give me an example of past performance that shows DPA can get it done.

Maybe Seham will help? His firm has only been fired by USAPA, APA, & SWAPA. And SWAPA was so disappointed in CAPA, they left and no longer have CAPA lobby for them. The same CAPA that lobbies for Chautauqua, Shuttle America, Republic, GoJet, Horizon, and Cape Air. But hey, at least there won't be a conflict of interest.
Reply
Old 11-13-2013 | 12:26 PM
  #8250  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

[QUOTE=Dorfman;1519236][QUOTE=DAL 88 Driver;1519017]More than you think (or are willing to admit). This isn't the place to discuss it. And I think you know that that

Why? Dont you advocate for the release of survey results? I understand this is a public webboard but you don't think that sending survey results out to pilots would be secure either do you?
That quote had nothing to do with survey results one way or the other.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices