![]() |
Rumor on the street is that american has already worked out a deal to buy these...
http://rpmedia.ask.com/ts?u=/wikiped..._CSeries-1.jpg And in the mean time fly these to replace some of the 80s....Americans plan is to divest eagle and make it an all ATR's/ERJ fleet...Getting around scope by moving the 700's to AA....Its still just a rumor http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3597/...71ef0140e3.jpg |
Hearing from my AA contacts that they are setting up to recall everyone. Hope it's true
|
ya thats it, AA will have all flying over 50 seats by mainline pilots, I can see that, 2012 1billion loss. They will have a business model extremely different from UAL/DAL.
|
al65 - 30-35 recalls a month eff. August. No planned stop to recalls.
|
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1004838)
ya thats it, AA will have all flying over 50 seats by mainline pilots, I can see that, 2012 1billion loss. They will have a business model extremely different from UAL/DAL.
Within five years, regionals should return to what they are designed to do - fly fuel efficient turboprops over short distances to add to mainline load factors. |
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1004806)
What I dont get with AMR, is they need a solution to this scope stuff, and Eagle. It seems easy to me that both sides just give up a little, and that would be to get 100 seat jets and put them on the AA side with AA pilots, and for each 100 seat, Eagle gets a 70 seat. It seems to be the only win/win, but I guess that might be too logical.
|
not at all, and SKYW lost money because they purchased other airlines. But I mean seriously, do you think AMR has any plan to put all the crj700 and all new airplanes on AA with AA pilots/FA/MX/Gate Agents ETC, I mean come on seriously? While United/DAL have TONS of CRJ700/900 doing their domestic flying. I am not saying I want it that way, I would love to see all jet flying go mainline, but AMR with their loses is trying to be outsource flying, not bring the CRJ700 to AA.
|
Just a quick question: Not to put a damper on all the off the street hiring we expect but with no capacity added, and with only trickle retirements wouldn't that make them only a couple hundred pilots short? So theoretically, they may not even make it to the bottom of the list this time around even with only 1 out of 6 coming back. Just wondering if anyone has heard a hard number of how many pilots they need to get on line??
|
tone - no number on how many warm bodies they need. Guessing some of the manning bump is for the upcoming duty hours being changed by the FAA/Congress.
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1003562)
50/month was earlier this year. June/July have been 25 per month.
In 90 days we'll have perfect 20/20 lookback clarity. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands