Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
AA in talks with Airbus >

AA in talks with Airbus

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AA in talks with Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2011 | 09:04 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: 777 Left
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I seem to recall those who actually have flown the 321 saying it was grossly underwinged...something new engines and sharklets really won't address.

As for Airbus commonality for single-aisle aircraft...didn't eliminating the 757 from production take Boeing to the exact same place?
I fly the Bus, it is really nice to pilot. But the 321 is a pig when loaded up. I do mean a PIG to fly. It climbs SO S L O W..... And range? What range?
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 05:19 AM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
I fly the Bus, it is really nice to pilot. But the 321 is a pig when loaded up. I do mean a PIG to fly. It climbs SO S L O W..... And range? What range?
Rode on a fully loaded 321 before and although surprisingly comfortable, agree shot the performance.

Puke an engine and it's a seneca with the gear down.
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 07:12 AM
  #63  
The Dominican's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: 747 captain
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
I fly the Bus, it is really nice to pilot. But the 321 is a pig when loaded up. I do mean a PIG to fly. It climbs SO S L O W..... And range? What range?
Took off behind the a380 from Singapore to Narita recently (the 380, a 320 then us on the 76) caught up to it in the mid 20s during the climb and passed it while in Manila's airspace, as we were getting off at the gate (after passenger deplaning) is when they were parking at the gate in Narita, the performance on that contraption is as ugly as its looks.
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 09:47 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: A320 captain
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I seem to recall those who actually have flown the 321 saying it was grossly underwinged...something new engines and sharklets really won't address.

As for Airbus commonality for single-aisle aircraft...didn't eliminating the 757 from production take Boeing to the exact same place?
It is under-powered, but new, more powerful engines will address that problem. And the winglets, as previously stated will increase the aspect ratio, improving performance across the board.
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: 777 Left
Default

The 321 will not be "fixed" with new engines and winglets alone. I fly the Bus. It is very comfy and the 320 has nice performance, but is marginal on the wing. A 737 will outclimb and top out higher and faster. Now having said that, I will take the 320 over the 737 anyday. It is more comfortable and the front end is quiet. But the wing is really sized for the 319. By the time you get to the 321 you are just loading the bird way too much. It is very slow to climb, struggles to get on top and the range is just sad. Again, it is roomy, but dog slow. You could never do West Coast to Hawaii like the 75 or even the 738. I just dont see the winglets improving enough on the lift because you need more fuel, which is more weight, which is less performance. The 321 is just a stretch too far on the smallish 320 wing.
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 10:29 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: 777 Left
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican
Took off behind the a380 from Singapore to Narita recently (the 380, a 320 then us on the 76) caught up to it in the mid 20s during the climb and passed it while in Manila's airspace, as we were getting off at the gate (after passenger deplaning) is when they were parking at the gate in Narita, the performance on that contraption is as ugly as its looks.
Are you talking about the 380 or 320? I didnt know the 380 was doggy as well..... But it wouldnt surprise me, given the 321 and the 340.
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 10:40 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: A320 captain
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
The 321 will not be "fixed" with new engines and winglets alone. I fly the Bus. It is very comfy and the 320 has nice performance, but is marginal on the wing. A 737 will outclimb and top out higher and faster. Now having said that, I will take the 320 over the 737 anyday. It is more comfortable and the front end is quiet. But the wing is really sized for the 319. By the time you get to the 321 you are just loading the bird way too much. It is very slow to climb, struggles to get on top and the range is just sad. Again, it is roomy, but dog slow. You could never do West Coast to Hawaii like the 75 or even the 738. I just dont see the winglets improving enough on the lift because you need more fuel, which is more weight, which is less performance. The 321 is just a stretch too far on the smallish 320 wing.
Damn you're good!!! But I think it's a little early to judge, having not flown it yet. More thrust and winglets will likely be an improvement. How much of an improvement?
...gotta ask an airbus engineer at this point.
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 11:04 AM
  #68  
The Dominican's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: 747 captain
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
Are you talking about the 380 or 320? I didnt know the 380 was doggy as well..... But it wouldnt surprise me, given the 321 and the 340.
Given that the distance from Singapore to Tokyo equates to a flight from Quito, Ecuador to Toronto. Which one you would guess that I'm referring to?
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: 777 Left
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican
Given that the distance from Singapore to Tokyo equates to a flight from Quito, Ecuador to Toronto. Which one you would guess that I'm referring to?
Sure. I brain farted on that one
Reply
Old 06-26-2011 | 05:33 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: 777 Left
Default

Originally Posted by TTOCSMCC
Damn you're good!!! But I think it's a little early to judge, having not flown it yet. More thrust and winglets will likely be an improvement. How much of an improvement?
...gotta ask an airbus engineer at this point.
It seems to me that Boeing plans for growth by putting on a bigger wing than required for the initial models, which costs them a bit in efficiency on cruise. But Airbus tends to go with small efficient wings that limit growth. I know the 321 has a trailing edge "kink" to increase surface area, but it just isnt enough.

Having never flown a 737 without and than with winglets, I wonder the gain achieved? Anyone have comments on this?

Regarding AA buying the Bus, I thought after the 300 in New York, that AA was pretty unhappy with how Airbus pointed to AA training. My recollection was that AA and Airbus were pretty much "enemies" after that. Of course a low price on some new narrows might fix the hard feelings in rapid fashion.....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fireman0174
Major
16
04-18-2007 09:33 AM
vagabond
Technical
11
04-03-2007 05:52 AM
fireman0174
Major
0
01-18-2007 02:29 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
0
12-30-2005 07:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices