Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta defers 100 seat RFP >

Delta defers 100 seat RFP

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta defers 100 seat RFP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:10 PM
  #21  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
That is why, the pilots of DAL need to realize that the 717 is the easiest option, but not a option that is totally on the table yet. The second option is the 190, and to do that where DAL can make the business case for it, means thinking outside of traditional means. That may mean bringing some smaller flying here, and it my have to be done in a non-traditional manner. Ala, another corporation owning the jet, but our seniority listed pilots flying the jets along side pilots that are flying the 170/175. It may not be a traditional acquisition that would dictate a SLI, and for that reason, we would need to figure out what is in the best interest of the Delta Pilots with a scenario like that. I am sure DAL wants the training efficiencies one way or another. Also understand that places like SKW get better terms for loans that ma delta does. DAL may be able to sell bonds for the new jets, but the rates would probably be around 8.75%+ for these new jets.

Yes, this is just my mind day dreaming and musing of possibilities today, so take it as such.
Do you think today's MEC would vote differently on Compass?
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:11 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,868
Likes: 187
Default

They put the decision off because they don't want a jet with less then 130 seats in a two class and would prefer 140. This is the Maddog replacement keep in mind. The C series 300 version is close. Nothing from EMB can do that at the moment. The smaller Airbuses and Boeings are not that efficient That may change soon. No politics, No contract plans or hopes on the companies part. They want competing bids for a aircraft in that size. There is nothing today. The picture in that segment will be quite different in 24 months and so will pricing. They don't want the 717. Never have had a interest and don't today. Its a dog in many ways. To small, not that efficient and not enough available. I wont even get into the engine issues.
They simply don't want to pay almost the same price for a 130 seat jet as the 900's they are getting. This comes from a good source. EMB may have a announcement in the next 12 months that will provide the competition needed in the segment.
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:14 PM
  #23  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

An AT FO told me on the hotel van that when you fly the B717 you have one good engine & one bad engine.
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:14 PM
  #24  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They put the decision off because they don't want a jet with less then 130 seats in a two class and would prefer 140. The C series 300 version is close or there. Nothing from EMB can do that at the moment. That may chance soon. No politics, No contract plans or hopes on the companies part. They want a competing bids for a aircraft in that size. There is nothing today. The picture in that segment will be quite different in 24 months and so will pricing. They don't want the 717. Never have had a interest and don't today. Its a dog in many ways. To small, not that efficient and not enough available. I wont even get into the engine issues.
I can see you point wrt to the C-Series, but with a transaction or two there are enough 717's.

The Engine issues are easily dealt with with a engine shop like ours. Keeps costs down, esp, with a ownership cost of 15 million.
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:19 PM
  #25  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They put the decision off because they don't want a jet with less then 130 seats in a two class and would prefer 140. This is the Maddog replacement keep in mind. The C series 300 version is close. Nothing from EMB can do that at the moment. The smaller Airbuses and Boeings are not that efficient That may change soon. No politics, No contract plans or hopes on the companies part. They want competing bids for a aircraft in that size. There is nothing today. The picture in that segment will be quite different in 24 months and so will pricing. They don't want the 717. Never have had a interest and don't today. Its a dog in many ways. To small, not that efficient and not enough available. I wont even get into the engine issues.
They simply don't want to pay almost the same price for a 130 seat jet as the 900's they are getting. This comes from a good source. EMB may have a announcement in the next 12 months that will provide the competition needed in the segment.
Thank you for that post. That makes the most sense and smells better than my version of low tide.
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:21 PM
  #26  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It is my belief that DAL understands that forcing DALPA to sell scope for a short term gain would mean that ALPA would be done for, and they would have to deal with something new and totally unknown. Better to deal with the devil you know. I mean that.

No rep is willing to sell scope, even the ones I do not see eye to eye with on many issues, agree on this point. Period.

The fact is that if they cannot get the 717's they are faced with a dilemma. Buy the C-Series which is expensive but offers better savings. It is a step in the correct direction, but truly a half step to a next gen platform, or the E-Series, which is last gen, has the same type flown at DCI, and would place them at a point where they are forced to acquire the wrong airfame at the wrong time, for a price and or lease terms that really are unacceptable.

A few of the options with the E-Jets are these:
1) Make us sell them so that a airline like CPS, or RJET can get efficiencies with training

2) Bring those smaller e-jets here, gain the efficiencies of training for multiple types work as best as they can if we refuse to budge on scope. (Read: cumbersome process for a ten year fix, and one DAL would love to not mess with unless we unified and forced the issue. Frankly these may be an economic case for the latter, I have been thinking about this one)

3) Wrt to number two, if Embraer or another finance company is willing to give us a lease term of ten years on these jets, where DAL can leave the options open, and acquire the true next gen jet at the correct time frame.

Frankly, by waiting until they did for the 100 seat jet leaves them right in the middle of a few mediocre options. If they could have bought these jets in 2005 and not been in the middle of CH11, the lease terms would have made sense. We rightfully refused to sell the flying, and will rightfully refuse again. That leaves DAL hoping they can get a cheap used jet; the 717, or a great deal on the 190, or be stuck ordering a expensive half step; C-Series, that they will be stuck with well after the debut of the first narrowbody plastic jet.

That is why, the pilots of DAL need to realize that the 717 is the easiest option, but not a option that is totally on the table yet. The second option is the 190, and to do that where DAL can make the business case for it, means thinking outside of traditional means. That may mean bringing some smaller flying here, and it my have to be done in a non-traditional manner. Ala, another corporation owning the jet, but our seniority listed pilots flying the jets along side pilots that are flying the 170/175. It may not be a traditional acquisition that would dictate a SLI, and for that reason, we would need to figure out what is in the best interest of the Delta Pilots with a scenario like that. I am sure DAL wants the training efficiencies one way or another. Also understand that places like SKW get better terms for loans that ma delta does. DAL may be able to sell bonds for the new jets, but the rates would probably be around 8.75%+ for these new jets.

Yes, this is just my mind day dreaming and musing of possibilities today, so take it as such.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
They put the decision off because they don't want a jet with less then 130 seats in a two class and would prefer 140. This is the Maddog replacement keep in mind. The C series 300 version is close. Nothing from EMB can do that at the moment. The smaller Airbuses and Boeings are not that efficient That may change soon. No politics, No contract plans or hopes on the companies part. They want competing bids for a aircraft in that size. There is nothing today. The picture in that segment will be quite different in 24 months and so will pricing. They don't want the 717. Never have had a interest and don't today. Its a dog in many ways. To small, not that efficient and not enough available. I wont even get into the engine issues.
They simply don't want to pay almost the same price for a 130 seat jet as the 900's they are getting. This comes from a good source. EMB may have a announcement in the next 12 months that will provide the competition needed in the segment.
Thanks for the posts guys. Good perspective on the news.
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:49 PM
  #27  
RoughLandings's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

I know of an airline with 39, soon to be 42, E170/175s that would accept a staple. No SLI necessary.
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 12:56 PM
  #28  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
They can order all they want but scope is capped (at delta), they're running wild trying to figure out how to keep the gravy train running as the 50 seaters get parked. Gotta keep the shareholders happy....
They are taking another look at the 50 seaters.
Could be part of our new Atlantic strategy.

Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 01:37 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They put the decision off because they don't want a jet with less then 130 seats in a two class and would prefer 140. This is the Maddog replacement keep in mind. The C series 300 version is close. Nothing from EMB can do that at the moment. The smaller Airbuses and Boeings are not that efficient That may change soon. No politics, No contract plans or hopes on the companies part. They want competing bids for a aircraft in that size. There is nothing today. The picture in that segment will be quite different in 24 months and so will pricing. They don't want the 717. Never have had a interest and don't today. Its a dog in many ways. To small, not that efficient and not enough available. I wont even get into the engine issues.
They simply don't want to pay almost the same price for a 130 seat jet as the 900's they are getting. This comes from a good source. EMB may have a announcement in the next 12 months that will provide the competition needed in the segment.
Really? Rumor has it a training manager from Airtran came over to Delta to look at setting up a program that could tie it in with the MD88? (which FAA nixed anyway)
Reply
Old 08-25-2011 | 04:35 PM
  #30  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Really? Rumor has it a training manager from Airtran came over to Delta to look at setting up a program that could tie it in with the MD88? (which FAA nixed anyway)
That sums it up in bold.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 12:04 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 06:11 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
Slaphappy
Regional
0
08-22-2006 11:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices