Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Letter to DAL MEC Chairman, and response >

Letter to DAL MEC Chairman, and response

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Letter to DAL MEC Chairman, and response

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2011 | 09:03 AM
  #21  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSig
Actually Carl, ALPA volunteers were in AMS and CDG this month meeting with counterparts to produce this comparison (as directed by the MEC). Look for it in your inbox in the not too distant future.
I will look for it...right after the survey's window closes.

Car
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 09:05 AM
  #22  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
Carl,

Wher were you able to view the Air France Pay Rates?
Google. Same for France's taxation policy.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 09:14 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Both NWALPA and DALPA said snapbacks were impossible because...the company said so. The company said industry revenue had been permanently reset, never to return. Thus snapbacks were impossible. And our ALPA experts agreed.

Carl
With all the FPL folks, fancy lawyers, high paid secretaries, and merger integration leverage...DALPA could not figure this out and ended up folding their cards. Unbelievable!
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 10:07 AM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Have we yet to see any successful snapbacks? Honest question.
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 10:28 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
Especially with the makeup of this NMB. Look no farther than the DAL FA mess with AFA. The previous NMB is who declared APA was out of touch.
And the UAE, where unions are flat out illegal, is subsidized by the import/export bank as well as government favoritism to the direct disadvantage of all US carriers. Oh and they just announced a massive US expansion and are exponentially increasing their cargo ops.

However they do have a lot of leverage. If we don't let them have their way with us, they might not let us be the defense provider for their entire region at our expense.
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 10:31 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Ok, show that data first. No one can seem to get a straight answer our of them. I have a KLM friend that is a Capt that is making in the range of 194 euros an hour plus better per diem, better vacation and line construction etc.

Second, we are not just talking about pay, but their benefits, vacation etc. Do not forget that the have significant government subsidized retirement and medical which we do not have. They start with six weeks of vacation, etc. Apples to apples. We need to look at the cost of each pilot to the corporation, not just pilot take home pay. Total cost and then look at what we have and then assign a value to what they get that they do not have to pay for.
Exactly. What is relevant to us is their pilot costs. No one cares what the take home pay for a euro-weenie is, that's their problem. Since management will squeal that high pilot costs will make us uncompetitive if we can show that management has no problem dumping more money than we are asking in pilot (and other costs, likely across the entire board...except maybe executive costs...) then they lose that arguement as well as general credibility in front of the mediator.
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 10:36 AM
  #27  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSig
Actually Carl, ALPA volunteers were in AMS and CDG this month meeting with counterparts to produce this comparison (as directed by the MEC). Look for it in your inbox in the not too distant future.

This is an example of a placating and plausibly deniable post.

If this is what working tirelessly looks like, its a pathetic joke.

The contract comparison, for all its glossiness, wasnt much more of a product than what is available on the airlines section of this website. Carl summarized AF/KLM adequately for pilots to make a decision.

ALPA continues to disappoint and manage expectations while giving an excuse about why it wasn't done sooner.
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 10:38 AM
  #28  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
And the UAE, where unions are flat out illegal, is subsidized by the import/export bank as well as government favoritism to the direct disadvantage of all US carriers. Oh and they just announced a massive US expansion and are exponentially increasing their cargo ops.

However they do have a lot of leverage. If we don't let them have their way with us, they might not let us be the defense provider for their entire region at our expense.
This is a huge problem for US airlines. We are basically being screwed by our own country.
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 10:40 AM
  #29  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by LandGreen2
With all the FPL folks, fancy lawyers, high paid secretaries, and merger integration leverage...DALPA could not figure this out and ended up folding their cards. Unbelievable!

ALPA EF&A, the best in the Galaxy. So good, the airline's ask for them by name.

Little hint:

The airlines ask for ALPA EF&A because they produce the product the company wants.
Reply
Old 09-28-2011 | 12:27 PM
  #30  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
This is an example of a placating and plausibly deniable post.

If this is what working tirelessly looks like, its a pathetic joke.

The contract comparison, for all its glossiness, wasnt much more of a product than what is available on the airlines section of this website. Carl summarized AF/KLM adequately for pilots to make a decision.

ALPA continues to disappoint and manage expectations while giving an excuse about why it wasn't done sooner.
What really makes this delay important was one of the very first questions in our survey. It asked you to give your opinion of our contract in comparison ONLY to the airlines listed in the ALPA produced contract comparison.

If this doesn't give everyone clear evidence that the intent of this survey is to provide the basis for a weak opener...nothing will. The evidence is everywhere, but you have to be willing to see it.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyguppy
United
228
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM
WatchThis!
Regional
63
07-11-2008 09:52 AM
Razor
Mergers and Acquisitions
23
04-22-2008 04:04 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices