![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1070411)
Their DC plan funding.
Their Reserve rules. |
Originally Posted by capncrunch
(Post 1070476)
And the second half of his question, would you vote no to the entire contract because of the two things you mentioned?
Nu |
By the way, to be in the top 1% of earners in 2010, you had to make over $380,000. GF |
I have a couple of single issue no votes. I have NEVER had that before, but I certainly do now.
|
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 1070558)
At some point we all need to become "single issue voters", because otherwise, we get nibbled to death.
Nu |
Originally Posted by jayme
(Post 1070362)
I'm no expert, but it seems to me that they are upset that the top 1% of the population are amassing more and more of the wealth, while the rest of us fight over the scraps. Pilot unions should share in that frustration. Instead I don't see any sympathy among this crowd.
Bucking Bar, I haven't seen or heard of anybody suggesting they "despise" anybody making over $100,000 a year (maybe the commentators on whichever new channel you watch?). Just frustration about the growing gap between the haves and have-nots. The frustration with well-paid management as you are left fighitng over the scraps seems like a pretty clear parallel with the Occupy Wall Street crowd. This isn't an insult, just an observation. By the way, to be in the top 1% of earners in 2010, you had to make over $380,000. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1070590)
I have a couple of single issue no votes. I have NEVER had that before, but I certainly do now.
|
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1070332)
You've contacted the DPA advisors and explained this to them, right? That isn't how Seham does it at USAPA, or he did it at PFAA, or AMFA...the group you crossed a picket line to kill.
Regarding me crossing a picket line to kill NWA mechanics, I crossed NO picket lines. Our union (you know, you're beloved ALPA) said we had no legal rights to honor their strike without being in violation of the RLA among other things. I know you know this already, you're just doing what you normally do...lie and distort to keep people from talking about what you want kept silent. Fail!
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1070332)
What makes you think Seham will let Timmy use a third party?
Carl |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1070332)
The other method is called Membership Ratification.
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1070332)
I knew you wouldn't remember that one. It is how ALPA has validated it's performance at getting contracts.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1070332)
You've contacted the DPA advisors and explained this to them, right? That isn't how Seham does it at USAPA, or he did it at PFAA, or AMFA...the group you crossed a picket line to kill.
. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands