Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Actual Airline Pay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2012 | 06:06 AM
  #11  
UAL SUX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: 2172
Default

Originally Posted by Outcast
Wow.

You really shouldn't post numbers like these on public message boards. Some manager will see this and feel justified in the fact that we make way too much money just sitting there pushing buttons and ask for more givebacks.

By the way my numbers look very much the same, I wonder why the press never references stuff like this when quoting airline pilot pay?

I feel it is critically important to post these numbers for everyone to see. Embarrassing? - Yep. Humiliating? - Absolutely.

Numbers don't lie. I want every pilot who aspires to fly for a major airline to take a long, hard look. You have a very good chance of looking back 10 - 15 years from now and seeing very similar numbers on your W2's.
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 07:07 AM
  #12  
Outcast's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UAL SUX
I feel it is critically important to post these numbers for everyone to see. Embarrassing? - Yep. Humiliating? - Absolutely.

Numbers don't lie. I want every pilot who aspires to fly for a major airline to take a long, hard look. You have a very good chance of looking back 10 - 15 years from now and seeing very similar numbers on your W2's.
Didn't you read the second paragraph in my post? After 13 years in the airline biz my W-2's do look like yours, pretty depressing.
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 07:31 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Just curious, is there a push to decertify ALPA and bring an in-house union at the new UCAL? and if so is it gaining momentum?
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 07:37 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Default

There have been some discussions about airline pilot pay on this forum recently. In light of this I though it would be enlightening to post a little fact versus fiction. Below are my ACTUAL W2 earnings as a major airline pilot represented by ALPA. Just for reference, I was hired 12 years ago at the age of 30.

2000 - $27,122.15
2001 - $51,273.64
2002 - $75,214.61
2003 - $22,348.90
2004 - $0.00
2005 - $0.00
2006 - $29,185.11
2007 - $69,144.68
2008 - $84,951.73
2009 - $64,640.60
2010 - $2,490.22
2011 - $0.00
2012 - $0.00

Total - $426,371.64

Average income for the 9 years I was on property - $47,374.63 / year
(Including partial years)

Average income for the 12 years since I was hired - $35,530.97 / year

Enjoy!
If I ever win the lottery I am calling in sick until I see the money deposited into my bank account and then I am quitting without two weeks notice. I wouldn't need to leave on good terms because I would never want to go back.
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 08:01 AM
  #15  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Cruise
What an ignorant post.
Pretty much agree with ya.
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 09:21 AM
  #16  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,138
Likes: 30
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by Cruise
What an ignorant post.
Seeing how some of those amounts probably due to ALPA's view that quantity of jobs is better than quality, I'd say it's not all that ignorant. At some point we (not just ALPA) decided it was better to hold onto our jobs and water down the industry, rather than preserve fewer jobs with higher QOL....
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 10:50 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Seeing how some of those amounts probably due to ALPA's view that quantity of jobs is better than quality, I'd say it's not all that ignorant. At some point we (not just ALPA) decided it was better to hold onto our jobs and water down the industry, rather than preserve fewer jobs with higher QOL....
Have to agree on some level. You also have to add into that the first year pay, which ALPA negotiates. Because hey, it's all about the senior guys, "you're gonna move up in NO time to narrow body CA", etc etc etc.

Combine that with how much the guy had to fly and be away from home due to ALPA negotiating away the trip/duty rig provisions for the narrow body aircraft, yet retaining it on the wide body. Because, again, it's all about the senior guys.

Note/disclaimer: That's NOT a slam an ALL the senior guys. There are many the that "get it". But that doesn't change the FACT that the prevailing mentality of ALPA and every other unionized carrier has always been that way, and always will be that way.
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 11:18 AM
  #18  
throttleweenie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: A-320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Cruise
What an ignorant post.
Seeing how some of those amounts probably due to ALPA's view that quantity of jobs is better than quality, I'd say it's not all that ignorant. At some point we (not just ALPA) decided it was better to hold onto our jobs and water down the industry, rather than preserve fewer jobs with higher QOL....
That results in more furloughees, another word for junior guys losing their jobs, which would just stir up more distain for senior pilots. Of course, that normally means old and wide-body pilots.

TW
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 11:34 AM
  #19  
throttleweenie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: A-320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Seeing how some of those amounts probably due to ALPA's view that quantity of jobs is better than quality, I'd say it's not all that ignorant. At some point we (not just ALPA) decided it was better to hold onto our jobs and water down the industry, rather than preserve fewer jobs with higher QOL....
Have to agree on some level. You also have to add into that the first year pay, which ALPA negotiates. Because hey, it's all about the senior guys, "you're gonna move up in NO time to narrow body CA", etc etc etc.

Combine that with how much the guy had to fly and be away from home due to ALPA negotiating away the trip/duty rig provisions for the narrow body aircraft, yet retaining it on the wide body. Because, again, it's all about the senior guys.

Note/disclaimer: That's NOT a slam an ALL the senior guys. There are many the that "get it". But that doesn't change the FACT that the prevailing mentality of ALPA and every other unionized carrier has always been that way, and always will be that way.
Not a slam?

If you were to look at pay scales at UAL over 27 years, you'd see that the net percentage gain is greater in the narrow bodies. The UAL MEC that was in office during the first few years was mostly narrow body pilots.

If Glenn Tilton had gotten his way, there would not have been any narrow body airplanes at United. TED was meant to be a non-union low cost carrier. I'm surprised it didn't happen, given the high-powered, corrupt, sociopathic scum he was working with.

When our pensions got flushed, the senior guys lost a lot of potential earning power due to the short time left to make it up, as well as a much higher dollar value lost due to the longer time invested in their pensions.

TW
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 11:45 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by throttleweenie
Not a slam?
You misread what I was saying...........
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
L'il J.Seinfeld
Military
39
03-08-2013 02:45 PM
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
nerd2009
Major
73
09-26-2010 01:19 AM
whtever
Regional
110
12-15-2008 09:12 PM
L'il J.Seinfeld
Money Talk
22
11-27-2007 04:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices