Delta has a TA
#121
Gets Rolled on the Reg.
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Doesn't matter in that case. Just say NO!
#122
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
exactly...but my god if I ever see a 717 or anything larger than a -200 with "operated by XXXX" on the nose, other than those that are already out there, God help us all!
#124
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
I think the AT B717's have a MGTOW which exceeds 115,000 lbs as does the C-Series jet. The CRJ900 is already outsourced, so that's nothing new. While DAL does control the fleet of 9E, I don't think they control the contract negotiations. It's likely your current management team is trying to open all options. Their asking of rates for 86 seats and 115,000 lbs is completely unrelated to Delta pilot negotiations. I'd say it's more likely to do with AMR, and it's still a huge long shot.
#125
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
still don't get it do you? What have you added to the conversation/speculation? when looking at YOUR proposed rates you want to know the rates of the enemy....especially when management would love to outsource it to a 26 year old CA willing to fly it for $80/hr. Again, you're not thinking SCOPE. That's all gentlemen I'll go back to my own sandbox now and play.
#126
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Originally Posted by Express pilot
So again, we can talk about a Delta TA and not what 9e pay is.
The Delta pilot will vote what the Delta pilot will. And if we all had our own vote that'd be about 10,000 different votes.
#127
I understand scope if thats what your asking. We are not going to vote in a B scale. The first thing I will look at if we get to vote is the Scope. So relax. I'm just not a fan of your contact issues with 9e on a Delta forum. Trust me, I fly with enough guys that Scope is a big issue on this contract. We don't need a RJ savior on here preaching to us.
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
I understand scope if thats what your asking. We are not going to vote in a B scale. The first thing I will look at if we get to vote is the Scope. So relax. I'm just not a fan of your contact issues with 9e on a Delta forum. Trust me, I fly with enough guys that Scope is a big issue on this contract. We don't need a RJ savior on here preaching to us.
Last edited by IBPilot; 05-16-2012 at 08:07 AM.
#129
No contract or TA will have any effect on a decision of management to merge or not merge the airline. Management can merge tomorrow with any airline they want. The new contract has zero bearing on those decisions unless we manage to scope out Alaska. That would force management to make a move to purchase the airline. There would be no other choice for management if they are going to protect the feed for SEA and LAX.
If we attempted to do that flying ourselves it would create a bloodbath that would result in large losses for both airlines. We don't have the gates or facilities to ramp up the flying regardless.
A reduction in the Alaska code share would have to be phased in over time however Alaska is not likely to go along with such a approach. In the end a merger may be the best overall option for Delta andSENIORDelta pilots.
If we attempted to do that flying ourselves it would create a bloodbath that would result in large losses for both airlines. We don't have the gates or facilities to ramp up the flying regardless.
A reduction in the Alaska code share would have to be phased in over time however Alaska is not likely to go along with such a approach. In the end a merger may be the best overall option for Delta andSENIORDelta pilots.

Respectfully, look around. Look at what you see and hear. As an Alpa Pac supporter, I am one of ALPA's number one fans. Recently (past 2 years), I have been trying to look at the BIG picture without any bias. What I see is an industry picked apart and reduced to nothing more than a job. It seems ALPA is more interested in revenue creation and political agendas that benefit their establishment. I mean, for Pete's Sake, the industry is in upheaval and all ALPA cares about is Crew pass
In a way, it feels like the UNION has become a pro management tool. What was once a fierce contender, negotiator and proponent of safety and career progression has become a little "soft", imho. RESTORATION should have been the bottom line. Yet all I hear is less than 30% and more relief on scope.
Like I said, maybe these rumors about a pathetic raise and urgency of TA have got me a little up-tight and defensive. I will stand corrected and bite my tongue if I am wrong.
Respectfully,
TEN
** I also realize we are negotiating for the good of the WHOLE group. I realize some pilots are almost ready to retire, thus a little timid to ask for more. While younger guys might be a little more Gung-Ho, and want the whole world. I realize and understand this.
#130
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
No one knows that better than management. We have to start repairing holes in the boat and bailing out the water though. We can't just plug some, drill others and try to time it so it stays afloat just in time to drop the next group off at the dock as we head back to sea in a broken ship. There will always be pilots "one contract away" from retirement but we can't let that be used to further undermine this battered profession.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



