I'm Voting for the TA
#161
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
No I don't. I'm just someone who knows a good deal when I see it because i'm able to get past my initial disappointment and I have actually read throughout the TA and asked my reps questions and gotten an understanding of this very complex document. I'm no longer focusing on just one aspect of the TA. It's not the best deal by any stretch of the imagination however, it's a very good deal considering the economic environment we are in, what our counterparts at other major carriers are receiving now (the NMB WILL take this into consideration), and the expansion of mainline and simultaneous and significant overall reduction in DCI. Although I can't say for certain, I am confident that turning this thing down will not work out well for us and we will be kicking ourselves in the butt for years to come because of all of the mainline lift we will lose behind that bad decision. We are still losing money behind the initial rejection of the JCBA. Who's bright idea was that. It is my personal observation that RA is no pushover and is able to make a BUSINESS decision. Can we? It's not about fear, but a BUSINESS decision.
#162
No I don't. I'm just someone who knows a good deal when I see it because i'm able to get past my initial disappointment and I have actually read throughout the TA and asked my reps questions and gotten an understanding of this very complex document. I'm no longer focusing on just one aspect of the TA. It's not the best deal by any stretch of the imagination however, it's a very good deal considering the economic environment we are in, what our counterparts at other major carriers are receiving now (the NMB WILL take this into consideration), and the expansion of mainline and simultaneous and significant overall reduction in DCI. Although I can't say for certain, I am confident that turning this thing down will not work out well for us and we will be kicking ourselves in the butt for years to come because of all of the mainline lift we will lose behind that bad decision. We are still losing money behind the initial rejection of the JCBA. Who's bright idea was that. It is my personal observation that RA is no pushover and is able to make a BUSINESS decision. Can we? It's not about fear, but a BUSINESS decision.
#163
Oh, it's fine if he does...I'm simply saying that one's background may cloud judgement to some extent. Plus I think it's important to be honest here among friends. If not, then this forum loses credibility.
#164
That right there is hands down the funniest thing ever written on the interwebs... Reminds me of the Monty Python "funniest joke" skit. It cant be viewed all at once or death will ensue.
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle..
Forum.... credibility...
Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much...
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle..
Forum.... credibility...
Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much...
#165
That right there is hands down the funniest thing ever written on the interwebs... Reminds me of the Monty Python "funniest joke" skit. It cant be viewed all at once or death will ensue.
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle..
Forum.... credibility...
Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much...
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle..
Forum.... credibility...
Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much...
Oh, and let that be a lesson to you T, don't drink and read this forum!
#166
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
That right there is hands down the funniest thing ever written on the interwebs... Reminds me of the Monty Python "funniest joke" skit. It cant be viewed all at once or death will ensue.
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle..
Forum.... credibility...
Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much...
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle..
Forum.... credibility...
Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much...
#168
T, I think you probably ROFLYFAO more than anybody on here! I've never done that, but I have small children in the house.
"Elvis" was actually my Air Force nickname/callsign.
I kind of look at this as chatting in the crew van or at dinner with other crews.
-------
Word of the day regarding the TA: "apoplectic". Just came up on my iPad from dictionary.com and it seems to apply.
"Elvis" was actually my Air Force nickname/callsign.
I kind of look at this as chatting in the crew van or at dinner with other crews.
-------
Word of the day regarding the TA: "apoplectic". Just came up on my iPad from dictionary.com and it seems to apply.
Last edited by Elvis90; 06-05-2012 at 09:02 AM.
#169
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,848
Likes: 199
From: window seat
This TA will not reduce the need for as many reserve pilots and her's why:
The increase to max reserve resolves the situation in a category with long
trips in which a reserve pilot with, for example, 30 hours for the month cannot be assigned even a single rotation without taking him/her above the ALV, which
is currently max reserve. The staffing formula is designed to require enough reserve pilots to cover about 60 hours
of flying each. In any rolling 12-month period, if the average reserve pilot flies less than 60 hours, the staffing formula requires incrementally fewer reserve pilots in succeeding months. If, on the other hand, the average reserve pilot flies more than 60 hours, the formula requires incrementally more reserve pilots. The more reserve pilots fly, the more reserve pilots are required. In other words, if the increase to max reserve causes reserve pilots to fly more, the staffing formula will in turn require more reserve pilots, which will subsequently reduce the aver- age flown by reserves.
The increase to max reserve resolves the situation in a category with long
trips in which a reserve pilot with, for example, 30 hours for the month cannot be assigned even a single rotation without taking him/her above the ALV, which
is currently max reserve. The staffing formula is designed to require enough reserve pilots to cover about 60 hours
of flying each. In any rolling 12-month period, if the average reserve pilot flies less than 60 hours, the staffing formula requires incrementally fewer reserve pilots in succeeding months. If, on the other hand, the average reserve pilot flies more than 60 hours, the formula requires incrementally more reserve pilots. The more reserve pilots fly, the more reserve pilots are required. In other words, if the increase to max reserve causes reserve pilots to fly more, the staffing formula will in turn require more reserve pilots, which will subsequently reduce the aver- age flown by reserves.
#170
T, I think you probably ROFLYFAO more than anybody on here! I've never done that, but I have small children in the house.
"Elvis" was actually my Air Force nickname/callsign.
I kind of look at this as chatting in the crew van or at dinner with other crews.
-------
Word of the day regarding the TA: "apoplectic". Just came up on my iPad from dictionary.com and it seems to apply.
"Elvis" was actually my Air Force nickname/callsign.
I kind of look at this as chatting in the crew van or at dinner with other crews.
-------
Word of the day regarding the TA: "apoplectic". Just came up on my iPad from dictionary.com and it seems to apply.
And FWIW, I view these forums as nothing more than a place to chat too... other than that, I place no real credibility for hidden bits of unknown information in any of these forums.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



