I'm Voting for the TA
06-04-2012 | 03:21 PM
#131
No longer cares
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
We must have never met. 
I got to fly the 767 about once every 3 months with less frequency than that as we "synergized."
I nearly always said "757 and 767."
More on topic, in this TA there is zero reason why the MD-88, A320, and 737 pay shouldn't be equalized into a single band.
The 737-900 should be increased to equal the 757, IMO... The 747-400 should have been bumped up a few bucks higher than the 777, as well.
I got to fly the 767 about once every 3 months with less frequency than that as we "synergized."
I nearly always said "757 and 767."
More on topic, in this TA there is zero reason why the MD-88, A320, and 737 pay shouldn't be equalized into a single band.
The 737-900 should be increased to equal the 757, IMO... The 747-400 should have been bumped up a few bucks higher than the 777, as well.
You just said that last one just to **** me off, didn't you?
06-04-2012 | 04:31 PM
#132
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
We must have never met.
I got to fly the 767 about once every 3 months with less frequency than that as we "synergized."
I nearly always said "757 and 767."
More on topic, in this TA there is zero reason why the MD-88, A320, and 737 pay shouldn't be equalized into a single band.
The 737-900 should be increased to equal the 757, IMO... The 747-400 should have been bumped up a few bucks higher than the 777, as well.
I got to fly the 767 about once every 3 months with less frequency than that as we "synergized."
I nearly always said "757 and 767."
More on topic, in this TA there is zero reason why the MD-88, A320, and 737 pay shouldn't be equalized into a single band.
The 737-900 should be increased to equal the 757, IMO... The 747-400 should have been bumped up a few bucks higher than the 777, as well.
Carl
06-04-2012 | 07:43 PM
#134
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,845
Likes: 197
From: window seat
APA's proposal or USAir management's proposal to APA?
06-04-2012 | 07:45 PM
#136
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,845
Likes: 197
From: window seat
Yeah why even bother with the 50 cents/hr over regular 737 pay? Seems like it would cost more to keep up with the split among a common fleet than it would to just raise the entire fleet to it.
06-04-2012 | 07:46 PM
#137
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,845
Likes: 197
From: window seat
06-04-2012 | 07:55 PM
#138
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
I haven't seen the specific wording or restrictions on them, though.
06-05-2012 | 12:40 AM
#139
Happy to be here
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
We will find out on June 22nd if the Judge will throw APA's contract out. If they do, DAL will want to move ASAP. Does that equate to leverage? If the judge doesn't we will have to wait and see what the results of their negotiations are.
Anything is possible, but I do not see the judge being the first to throw an agreement out, especially when AMR has until Sept 29th before they lose exclusivity.
Anything is possible, but I do not see the judge being the first to throw an agreement out, especially when AMR has until Sept 29th before they lose exclusivity.
06-05-2012 | 04:06 AM
#140
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
That seemed very bizzare to me, but when I asked a rep about it they said the NC tried but the company would not even consider it....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
