Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

I'm Voting for the TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2012 | 12:44 PM
  #31  
qball's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
great. so the 90 will still make less than the 320, which carries fewer pax.

still a "no" from me.
Kind of like the B744 carries more than the B777 but pays the same...Just sayin.

Looking like a no vote from me....scope language has gaps you taxi an A380 through.
Old 05-30-2012 | 12:45 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,602
Likes: 360
Default

I'm curious what happens if we actually hold the line on scope. These 76 seat jets have already been ordered and our scope is already capped out.
Old 05-30-2012 | 12:48 PM
  #33  
FIIGMO's Avatar
Sho me da money!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: B25, Left
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'm curious what happens if we actually hold the line on scope. These 76 seat jets have already been ordered and our scope is already capped out.

Hock,

where did you see that these jets were already ordered? I bet the wheels are in place but do you have facts? Just trying to keep facts facts and hunches hunches. No flame or disrespect. edumacate me...
Old 05-30-2012 | 02:29 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
These 76 seat jets have already been ordered and our scope is already capped out.
If so...now THERE'S some leverage!

But I'm sure DALPA can find a way to squander it...again.
Old 05-30-2012 | 02:51 PM
  #35  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'm curious what happens if we actually hold the line on scope. These 76 seat jets have already been ordered and our scope is already capped out.
Delta would likely Pinnaclize its DCI partners to gain contract flexibility on the 50 seaters. Mainline would be forced to order more narrowbody aircraft to cover that flying reduction. Contract negotiations would likely stall since management didn't get what it wanted.
Old 05-30-2012 | 03:36 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
. Contract negotiations would likely stall since management didn't get what it wanted.
They would not stall simply out of spite--very short-sighted and frankly, a poor business decision.

Their obligation is to the shareholders, etc. To slow-roll us at the expense of their fiduciary duty to increase value would open them up to liability issues.
Old 05-30-2012 | 05:05 PM
  #37  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
They would not stall simply out of spite--very short-sighted and frankly, a poor business decision.

Their obligation is to the shareholders, etc. To slow-roll us at the expense of their fiduciary duty to increase value would open them up to liability issues.
True, but that's usually how negotiations go; If one side won't budge on an issue it stalls out the process. That's assuming management wants scope relief and considers it a must have item.
Old 05-30-2012 | 05:13 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
True, but that's usually how negotiations go; If one side won't budge on an issue it stalls out the process. That's assuming management wants scope relief and considers it a must have item.
Then let them stall--they are at their hard cap right now...and since we (supposedly) won't be getting the 717 planes when the TA fails , they can't increase DCI at 3-1.

It's evident management needs this deal done now far more than we do. It can be done sooner than later, but they will need to sweeten the pot.

Voting this thing down will also provide the intangible (but nevertheless valuable) lesson to management that we won't be steamrolled now or in the future.
Old 05-30-2012 | 05:46 PM
  #39  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flyingdaddy810
Yeah, all pilots that I have spoken with, as well as myself were hoping for a bigger pay raise. However, going after more money right now may result in giving up money while waiting around for an agreement for more money...now, does that make sense?. It would be stupid to throw the TA back into the negotiating pot and risk giving up some of the gains (early- out, retirement, scope, mainline positions, etc.), which may or may not be resolved at some indefinite time in the future...maybe years, for what gain? 3%-5% maybe 8% more pay?

This TA is a few steps in the right direction. It is something positive we can benefit from now and build on for the next contract. Like: inclusion of all 76 seaters into the mainline contract!!


Of course, those people that are negative are always louder than those that are positive. It’s human nature to be a skeptical, negative #$@#$%^&!! Maybe I could share with our pilots that My brother-in-law at American, and my friends down in PHX and CLT at USairways would give their eye teeth to get a contract equal to this Delta TA.

I think the MEC did the right thing sending the TA out for a vote. I hope we don't waste the opportunity to ratify this TA.

Delta MSP320CA
What I've bolded above is the reason I'm skeptical that you're actually a pilot and probably a cubicle resident. You think the MEC did the right thing? There was no choice by the MEC except to put it the TA out to MEMRAT. There's no airline pilot that doesn't know that.

Carl
Old 05-30-2012 | 06:20 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: B737 CA
Default

Carl - vinegar vs honey. If he's really a cubicle resident there's no chance of convincing him, but also no need to convince him, so why bother responding at all? If he's really a line pilot, though (more likely IMHO), he's one of the guys you need to convince to come to your side, and an attack probably isn't the best way to start out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
170
06-21-2012 10:03 PM
warbirdboy91
Hangar Talk
0
12-08-2011 09:57 AM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM
DLax85
Cargo
9
08-05-2007 06:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices