Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

New flaw in TA scope

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2012 | 01:31 PM
  #171  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

How many 76 seaters or 50 seaters does SWA have?
Old 05-31-2012 | 01:56 PM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: A330
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
UAL already has unlimited 70's.

DAL combined cap is 255 (lower than pre-merger DAL/NWA limit)......

All that with 25% lower pay(DAL TA will make UCAL 40% behind).

Thanks to UCAL for pulling their weight and helping raise the bar!

Who put pressure on whom?
The 70 seat is unlimited but it is tied to a ratio at mainline. I believe they are capped right now. They currently have 124 CRJ700/E170s (aka the 70 seater).

DCI has 255 large rjs. I am sure management at UAL would love the Delta scope and they would be really excited about having our TA scope.
Old 05-31-2012 | 04:55 PM
  #173  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
UAL already has unlimited 70's.

DAL combined cap is 255 (lower than pre-merger DAL/NWA limit)......

All that with 25% lower pay(DAL TA will make UCAL 40% behind).

Thanks to UCAL for pulling their weight and helping raise the bar!

Who put pressure on whom?
Ask them, I have. They have read our TA and are not happy with the scope part. Not at all. They feel it cuts them off at the knees. They are neutral on the pay.
Old 05-31-2012 | 05:55 PM
  #174  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Ask them, I have. They have read our TA and are not happy with the scope part. Not at all. They feel it cuts them off at the knees. They are neutral on the pay.
See, FTB spreadsheet makes UAL happy.

TA makes UAL mad.
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:01 PM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Yep, we still get to be the initial accumulator in a down turn, then and only when we hit 1:59:1 does DCI reduction even become a possibility.
Last time I checked 1.19 is less than 1.56.

DCI is going to shrink with this TA and shrink a lot. Way before mainline will. And unlike FTB's bogus fleet sheet, using a real fleet plan that keeps seats in the appropriate markets means that the downside trigger of 1.56 would be hit at a fleet count between 30-40 airplanes greater than we have right now, and it will happen when DCI is 148 airplanes smaller than it is now.

What you assert as fact is incorrect.
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:08 PM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Last time I checked 1.19 is less than 1.56.

DCI is going to shrink with this TA and shrink a lot. Way before mainline will. And unlike FTB's bogus fleet sheet, using a real fleet plan that keeps seats in the appropriate markets means that the downside trigger of 1.56 would be hit at a fleet count between 30-40 airplanes greater than we have right now, and it will happen when DCI is 148 airplanes smaller than it is now.

What you assert as fact is incorrect.
Slow,

Question....
What happens if the company does not honor it's side of the agreement, and keep the ratios within contractual limits?
(What penalties are outlined in the TA against the company)
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:15 PM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Slow,

Question....
What happens if the company does not honor it's side of the agreement, and keep the ratios within contractual limits?
(What penalties are outlined in the TA against the company)
This outta be good. Getting popcorn........
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:20 PM
  #178  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Slow,

Question....
What happens if the company does not honor it's side of the agreement, and keep the ratios within contractual limits?
(What penalties are outlined in the TA against the company)
cue the crickets...

...or possibly a series of condescending non-sequiturs and inane obfuscation without any answer to your question whatsoever.
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:28 PM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Slow,

Question....
What happens if the company does not honor it's side of the agreement, and keep the ratios within contractual limits?
(What penalties are outlined in the TA against the company)
There are no penalties outlined in the TA against the company. Putting penalties in that agreement presupposes that they could violate the contract and it would be "ok", that there were penalties agreed to for violating it. It's akin to asking "what penalties are in the agreement if the company doesn't pay us." Also, if management isn't abiding by the agreement in the ratios, why would they abide by the agreed upon penalties?

Disputes like you describe are resolved in 2 places, the grievance process and the court system.
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:32 PM
  #180  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay

Disputes like you describe are resolved in 2 places, the grievance process and the court system.
Or we could wait for c2015, and concede what DALPA is too lazy or inept to enforce.
Kind of like this time, with the RAH cutout and DPJ giveaway.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Bucking Bar
Major
143
09-05-2009 04:39 PM
Toccata
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 09:40 AM
purple101
Cargo
3
08-05-2007 05:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices