Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

New flaw in TA scope

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2012 | 06:23 PM
  #311  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
If there was POS96 and C2K, I guess TA 2012 can be CN12 for Cost Neutral 2012?

Or something else more catchy, and don't use POS, that's already been used.
FUD2012.

Carl
Old 06-03-2012 | 06:44 PM
  #312  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

So with DCI 600/255 going to 450/325...

In exchange for doing that we'll allow the lusted over fleet of jumbo RJs to jump from 43% of the outsourced fleet to 72%.

That means if every single 50-seater is unprofitable and every jumbo RJ is, then we just made the DCI fleet nearly 70% more profitable inexchange for parking 150 regional jets, all of them unwanted due to cost.
Old 06-03-2012 | 06:53 PM
  #313  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So with DCI 600/255 going to 450/325...

That means if every single 50-seater is unprofitable and every jumbo RJ is, then we just made the DCI fleet nearly 70% more profitable inexchange for parking 150 regional jets, all of them unwanted due to cost.
Every single 50-seater is not unprofitable. Management wants to retain 125 of them because those particular aircraft are very profitable. The rest vary from mediocre to marginal to unprofitable.

Your base premise is wrong. But as part of that DCI transition you're so fond of we're transferring block hours from DCI to Delta mainline, which is good for the Delta pilots.

Last edited by slowplay; 06-03-2012 at 07:29 PM. Reason: doubled transition
Old 06-03-2012 | 07:18 PM
  #314  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Your base premise is wrong. But as part of that transitionDCI transition you're so fond of we're transferring block hours from DCI to Delta mainline, which is good for the Delta pilots.
Some of the reps are saying via email that we could add 110 jets and as many as 1,400 jobs between 717s, 90s and more 717s than announced. Of course, they also mention we could cut block hours, which is likely, and add as low as 400 pilots- which is before we take into account work rule changes purported to reducing 300 pilots.

So, which is it? Pure growth and over a thousand pilots or capacity discipline and no pilots?

Go back to July 2011:
Delta's results "fell short of Wall Street profit estimates as fuel costs grew at a higher rate than revenue, and its shares fell to a new year low."

The response: Delta Air Lines will further reduce capacity this year… the company plans to "retire 140 aircraft by the end of 2012, including the entire DC-9 fleet and Saab turboprop fleet as well as sixty 50-seat regional jets. Half of the aircraft will exit the fleet this year, resulting in an estimated $250 million in maintenance savings."

And then the key part: "We will resize the airline to new flying levels and reduce the size of our fleet, staff, and facilities," CEO Richard Anderson is quoted as saying on a conference call. Anderson says such moves are necessary as the carrier adapts to "a permanent high-fuel-price environment."

"We're very focused on being certain that the flying we do produces positive cash flow -- it's that simple," Anderson is quoted as saying by The Wall Street Journal.

The Journal adds that Anderson made a point to say that Delta is more concerned about profitability than winning market share.


So next time we miss earnings estimates, are we going to grow or cut?


.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 06-03-2012 at 07:39 PM. Reason: massive editing
Old 06-03-2012 | 07:33 PM
  #315  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Every single 50-seater is not unprofitable. Management wants to retain 125 of them because those particular aircraft are very profitable. The rest vary from mediocre to marginal to unprofitable.
So, 100% of DCI 450/325 will be profitable now? Whereas right now that is not the case.

So when did Delta become a 501(c)(3) so that we could donate so much to their cause of outsourcing us?
Old 06-03-2012 | 08:25 PM
  #316  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So, 100% of DCI 450/325 will be profitable now? Whereas right now that is not the case.

So when did Delta become a 501(c)(3) so that we could donate so much to their cause of outsourcing us?
If donating to their cause requires management to upsize mainline compared to DCI, raise our salaries by $420 million in the last year, shrink DCI by 25% in airframes and 16% in seats, enhances international scope and JV protections, raises vacation by 8%, raises reserve guarantee by an average 8%, etc. then I'm all for that IRS code.

Of course we can take your failed anti-drug strategy (just say no) and do what has been so successful for APA, UAL/CAL, PCL, ASA/XJT, etc.

Yup, we can do that.

How'd SWA get where they are? And SWA, UPS or FedEx, whose companies have had sustained profitability and no bankruptcy ever reached the payrates that we achieved 8 years ago?
Old 06-03-2012 | 10:48 PM
  #317  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If donating to their cause requires management to upsize mainline compared to DCI, raise our salaries by $420 million in the last year, shrink DCI by 25% in airframes and 16% in seats, enhances international scope and JV protections, raises vacation by 8%, raises reserve guarantee by an average 8%, etc. then I'm all for that IRS code.

Of course we can take your failed anti-drug strategy (just say no) and do what has been so successful for APA, UAL/CAL, PCL, ASA/XJT, etc.

Yup, we can do that.

How'd SWA get where they are? And SWA, UPS or FedEx, whose companies have had sustained profitability and no bankruptcy ever reached the payrates that we achieved 8 years ago?

Slow;

You're right!

It was a failed anti-drug strategy because the DALPA sales team said "just say yes."
Old 06-03-2012 | 11:43 PM
  #318  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If donating to their cause requires management to upsize mainline compared to DCI, raise our salaries by $420 million in the last year, shrink DCI by 25% in airframes and 16% in seats, enhances international scope and JV protections, raises vacation by 8%, raises reserve guarantee by an average 8%, etc. then I'm all for that IRS code.

Of course we can take your failed anti-drug strategy (just say no) and do what has been so successful for APA, UAL/CAL, PCL, ASA/XJT, etc.

Yup, we can do that.

How'd SWA get where they are? And SWA, UPS or FedEx, whose companies have had sustained profitability and no bankruptcy ever reached the payrates that we achieved 8 years ago?
How much is the raise worth in 2013, not 2015? (real bump not adding value for the PIRP etc)
Old 06-03-2012 | 11:52 PM
  #319  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by DAL73n
ACL

You and FTB have the nail on the head with the flaw in the ration PROTECTION LANGUAGE. Everyone seems to think the ratios will require main line growth to keep up with DCI. Everyone (especially the MEC and LEC reps selling this TA) seems to forget that the ratios can be easily met by shrinking DCI with the retired 50s and the new 76 seaters. In addition, the 300 jobs lost are only an estimate of the new work rules and I believe the company will make much better use of the new work rules to prevent any new hiring and in fact will result in more displacement bids from higher paying A/C (everything at DAL main line) to lower paying A/C (717s) - this is another pay cut that no one is talking about.
The trick here is that they need to add 717 to grow the 76 seat fleet. It's in the contract, and some will see that is good. The danger is that the top end ratio of1.59-1 will be way below the ratio we are planned to be at; 1.76 to 1. This means that once all of the 717's and 76 seat aircraft are delivered, we could park 17% of the mainline domestic lift before DAL even has to look at DCI for cuts. I would venture to bet that this would be most of those 717's.

Based on the ratios we may get to 770 total mainline jets with what is seen. In reality we are probably going to see 40 growth jets, maybe until more happens. That "more" will not happen until Dal gets their debt down and that is what many reps apparently saw as leverage. This rj real does it and if this TA is voted down they still have a target debt level they need to get to. Not sure one new 777 in cost a year for the life of this agreement is worth walking away if the TA gets turned down. I know it wouldn't be for me.
Old 06-04-2012 | 04:32 AM
  #320  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If donating to their cause requires management to upsize mainline compared to DCI, raise our salaries by $420 million in the last year, shrink DCI by 25% in airframes and 16% in seats, enhances international scope and JV protections, raises vacation by 8%, raises reserve guarantee by an average 8%, etc. then I'm all for that IRS code.

Of course we can take your failed anti-drug strategy (just say no) and do what has been so successful for APA, UAL/CAL, PCL, ASA/XJT, etc.
Your notion is that I'm saying no just to say no. I am saying no because this TA is hideous.

Originally Posted by slowplay
Yup, we can do that.

How'd SWA get where they are? And SWA, UPS or FedEx, whose companies have had sustained profitability and no bankruptcy ever reached the payrates that we achieved 8 years ago?
How'd they do it? Good to excellent scope.

No whipsaw.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Bucking Bar
Major
143
09-05-2009 04:39 PM
Toccata
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 09:40 AM
purple101
Cargo
3
08-05-2007 05:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices