Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Hey DELTA, if you want more 70 seaters... >

Hey DELTA, if you want more 70 seaters...

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Hey DELTA, if you want more 70 seaters...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2012, 09:13 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 410
Default Hey DELTA, if you want more 70 seaters...

Fly Them At Mainline!!

Why aren't you guys/gals insisting on this, instead of selling more scope? (Bring the jobs back to mainline and your advancement will be much quicker.)
ColdWhiskey is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:24 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey View Post
Fly Them At Mainline!!

Why aren't you guys/gals insisting on this, instead of selling more scope? (Bring the jobs back to mainline and your advancement will be much quicker.)
That's conventional wisdom, but is it true?

APA, UAL and CAL don't allow 76 seaters in the small portion of their scope. How has career progression worked out at each one of those carriers?

APA - furloughs
UAL - furloughs
CAL - furloughed in 2008, recalled, slow hiring of furloughed UAL pilots
DAL - no furloughs, small (300) hiring in 2010.

Why is it that the airline with the "weakest" small jet scope never furloughed and the tighter guys did?
slowplay is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:27 AM
  #3  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay View Post
That's conventional wisdom, but is it true?

APA, UAL and CAL don't allow 76 seaters in the small portion of their scope. How has career progression worked out at each one of those carriers?

APA - furloughs
UAL - furloughs
CAL - furloughed in 2008, recalled, slow hiring of furloughed UAL pilots
DAL - no furloughs, small (300) hiring in 2010.

Why is it that the airline with the "weakest" small jet scope never furloughed and the tighter guys did?
DAL hired 300 in 2010? That is a lot for one year. How long did it take to get them through training?
block30 is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:30 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by block30 View Post
DAL hired 300 in 2010? That is a lot for one year. How long did it take to get them through training?
That's not even a burp for one year. In the 80's we hired on average over 600 per year. In the 90's we hired over 500 per year, and that was pre-merger. The system can handle way more than that.
slowplay is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:33 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Default

So the key to mainline hiring is outsourcing a fleet of DC9-10's in numbers equal to the size of the former Northwest Airlines fleet? How many will you hire when you outsource the MD-88 in the next TA?
mynameisjim is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:36 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post
So the key to mainline hiring is outsourcing a fleet of DC9-10's in numbers equal to the size of the former Northwest Airlines fleet? How many will you hire when you outsource the MD-88 in the next TA?
Nope, but you know that.

As a regional guy care to answer the original question on conventional wisdom? Maybe you have some additional facts for us to consider to support the position you've advocated here in the past. I'm not trying to be argumentative here...show me a better path, one that actually works, and I'll help get us there. But we've got to start from where we are, with our current contract and company, not from where you wish we would be.
slowplay is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:36 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey View Post
Fly Them At Mainline!!

Why aren't you guys/gals insisting on this, instead of selling more scope? (Bring the jobs back to mainline and your advancement will be much quicker.)
Sure, no problem! Is there any other heavy lifting that Delta pilots can do to improve YOUR next contract at YOUR airline?
CVG767A is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:44 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Default

I don't think Delta hired because of the large RJs, I think it was mostly the early retirements plus Delta smart plan of buying older, used airplanes in the down turn. United outsources the same plane types and range, just with different seating, so I doubt it is the answer.
mynameisjim is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:47 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post
I don't think Delta hired because of the large RJs, I think it was mostly the early retirements plus Delta smart plan of buying older, used airplanes in the down turn. United outsources the same plane types and range, just with different seating, so I doubt it is the answer.
I'm not disagreeing with your premise, but the original poster said "bring back jobs to mainline and your advancement will be much quicker." I provided examples of airlines that have those jobs at their mainline...and at each one they had furloughs and no advancement.

Yes, the early retirement program helped, but we didn't retire as many as we hired that year.
slowplay is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 05:01 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DoubleTrouble's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 169
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay View Post
That's conventional wisdom, but is it true?

APA, UAL and CAL don't allow 76 seaters in the small portion of their scope. How has career progression worked out at each one of those carriers?

APA - furloughs
UAL - furloughs
CAL - furloughed in 2008, recalled, slow hiring of furloughed UAL pilots
DAL - no furloughs, small (300) hiring in 2010.

Why is it that the airline with the "weakest" small jet scope never furloughed and the tighter guys did?
Again with the hiring due to DALPA's scope clause. Could it be the primary reason DAL did not furlough in the second half of '00's is because about 2300 pilots early retired in 2003-2005?

How many RJ's does the SWAPA scope allow, and how many pilots did SWA furlough?

There are many reasons an airline expands or contracts. Scope is just one of those reasons. To state as you do above that "the" reason (by omission of any other reason) is misleading.
DoubleTrouble is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices