Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Plan B?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2012 | 12:14 PM
  #61  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
I think that the ultimate plan is another merger for Delta. RA wants labor peace before he initiates this move. If we don't have a contract done the pilots will do everything possible to slow down a merger. One only has to compare our merger vs. US/AMwest or UAL/CAL to see the value that we gave Delta.

Back to the original post. If this TA gets shot down my belief is that the company will quickly come back with another offer. Why? Because the next merger will not be smooth unless we're on board as happy campers

The worst case scenario for us if we shoot down this TA is that the 717's do not come and the company somehow would end up with 255 76 seat RJ's. I can live with the worst case results if the TA gets shot down.

If one believes a merger is around the corner, good chance the company will come back to the table in a hurry. Just my .02
That and they will have to deal with us over FTDT before the end of the year or they get no changes there. There is leverage times 2.

What I really question is whether the MEC Chairman and Negotiating Chairman who are already conceding we'll do worse and have to give up something for it are up to the task of being more aggressive when, if what I'm reading is even half true disregarded the will of the pilots and the direction they were given reference pay by the MEC?
Old 06-23-2012 | 12:51 PM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
That and they will have to deal with us over FTDT before the end of the year or they get no changes there. There is leverage times 2.

What I really question is whether the MEC Chairman and Negotiating Chairman who are already conceding we'll do worse and have to give up something for it are up to the task of being more aggressive when, if what I'm reading is even half true disregarded the will of the pilots and the direction they were given reference pay by the MEC?

Nah, I'll take the 717s and a 19.7% raise. If there is another merger, you can add more cash to it because of a JCBA that would be needed. Makes you wonder why the last 2 years of the TA would be at 3% each? That I guess could go up.
Old 06-23-2012 | 12:53 PM
  #63  
DAL73n's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: 737n/FO
Default

Originally Posted by DelDah Capt
This is a curious example for you to use Carl......as I'm sure you are aware, the Airtran MEC voted down the initial SLI agreement on an almost unanimous tally (7-1) in August 2011. They were rewarded for their bravery by having SWA release the dogs and they ended up with what nearly everyone believes is a worse deal than the first. That doesn't strike me as event where voting 'NO' leads to bigger and better things.
Actually, this problem is identical to the problem AT had. By letting it get this far (out of negotiations to a formal TA) we (all the pilots) have lost any leverage we might have had. While I'm a No vote because there are a lot of things I don't think are acceptable it is more a matter of principle for me than thinking that there will be enough No votes to turn this down. While I think we could have done a lot better I don't think this MEC and NC has any plan going forward should this fail ratification. This should have stayed in the negotiation phase until the terms were acceptable (yes, I understand NEGOTIATION) which included getting closer to the survey, not requiring more work (I now see where DALPA thinks our average work month should be 80 hours so they can make the financials look better for the pilots - remember - this is worth $54,000+ to all of us). By getting to a TA and getting it through the MEC, it put DAL on the current path (announcing the change of profit sharing to the rest of the rank and file, the new pay raise to the rank and file, the 717s being contingent on passing the TA, the early retirement program for pilots, and on and on) that will probably result in contentious negotiations going forward. Don't tell me this is the best we can do - I just don't believe it (yes, I have read the TA - multiple times, and yes - I have looked at the NNPs and council member letters).
Old 06-23-2012 | 02:09 PM
  #64  
FL370's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: A somewhere
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Sometimes the dealer has a better hand, but you could always go for a 3rd card while holding a pair of nines....go for it....
Smart people realize the house always wins, hence never gamble.
Old 06-23-2012 | 02:26 PM
  #65  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by FL370
Smart people realize the house always wins, hence never gamble.
I agree. The TA is a good deal.
Old 06-23-2012 | 02:43 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FL370
Smart people realize the house always wins, hence never gamble.
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
I agree. The TA is a good deal.
Sorry FL370, but you walked right into that one.

You need to have your guard up with Bill.
Old 06-23-2012 | 03:47 PM
  #67  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
I'm aware of that, just thought the audience understood that point. Point is that I can live with whatever happens if we vote this down.
whoops my bad.


can i say my bad? i'm still coming to terms with the fact if they remade Back to thr Future in 3 years that going from 2015 to 1985 is the same amount of time as going from 1985 to 1955. geeish.
Old 06-23-2012 | 03:57 PM
  #68  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,107
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
whoops my bad.


can i say my bad? i'm still coming to terms with the fact if they remade Back to thr Future in 3 years that going from 2015 to 1985 is the same amount of time as going from 1985 to 1955. geeish.
Where's my damn flying DeLorean, and Mr. Fusion?

Nu
Old 06-23-2012 | 04:38 PM
  #69  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
whoops my bad.


can i say my bad? i'm still coming to terms with the fact if they remade Back to thr Future in 3 years that going from 2015 to 1985 is the same amount of time as going from 1985 to 1955. geeish.
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:38 PM
  #70  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
United
1
01-07-2012 09:57 AM
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
10
11-07-2011 01:07 PM
Cardinal
Major
0
11-04-2006 11:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices