Plan B?
#61
I think that the ultimate plan is another merger for Delta. RA wants labor peace before he initiates this move. If we don't have a contract done the pilots will do everything possible to slow down a merger. One only has to compare our merger vs. US/AMwest or UAL/CAL to see the value that we gave Delta.
Back to the original post. If this TA gets shot down my belief is that the company will quickly come back with another offer. Why? Because the next merger will not be smooth unless we're on board as happy campers
The worst case scenario for us if we shoot down this TA is that the 717's do not come and the company somehow would end up with 255 76 seat RJ's. I can live with the worst case results if the TA gets shot down.
If one believes a merger is around the corner, good chance the company will come back to the table in a hurry. Just my .02
Back to the original post. If this TA gets shot down my belief is that the company will quickly come back with another offer. Why? Because the next merger will not be smooth unless we're on board as happy campers

The worst case scenario for us if we shoot down this TA is that the 717's do not come and the company somehow would end up with 255 76 seat RJ's. I can live with the worst case results if the TA gets shot down.
If one believes a merger is around the corner, good chance the company will come back to the table in a hurry. Just my .02
What I really question is whether the MEC Chairman and Negotiating Chairman who are already conceding we'll do worse and have to give up something for it are up to the task of being more aggressive when, if what I'm reading is even half true disregarded the will of the pilots and the direction they were given reference pay by the MEC?
#62
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
That and they will have to deal with us over FTDT before the end of the year or they get no changes there. There is leverage times 2.
What I really question is whether the MEC Chairman and Negotiating Chairman who are already conceding we'll do worse and have to give up something for it are up to the task of being more aggressive when, if what I'm reading is even half true disregarded the will of the pilots and the direction they were given reference pay by the MEC?
What I really question is whether the MEC Chairman and Negotiating Chairman who are already conceding we'll do worse and have to give up something for it are up to the task of being more aggressive when, if what I'm reading is even half true disregarded the will of the pilots and the direction they were given reference pay by the MEC?
Nah, I'll take the 717s and a 19.7% raise. If there is another merger, you can add more cash to it because of a JCBA that would be needed. Makes you wonder why the last 2 years of the TA would be at 3% each? That I guess could go up.
#63
This is a curious example for you to use Carl......as I'm sure you are aware, the Airtran MEC voted down the initial SLI agreement on an almost unanimous tally (7-1) in August 2011. They were rewarded for their bravery by having SWA release the dogs and they ended up with what nearly everyone believes is a worse deal than the first. That doesn't strike me as event where voting 'NO' leads to bigger and better things.
#67
can i say my bad? i'm still coming to terms with the fact if they remade Back to thr Future in 3 years that going from 2015 to 1985 is the same amount of time as going from 1985 to 1955. geeish.
#70
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
11
01-18-2017 07:53 PM



