Plan B?
#31
This is so much bigger than just this TA.
Carl
#33
Had the MEC followed the proper protocol, it wouldn't have gotten to this point.
The MEC could have redirected the NC, they would have gone back in, fixed the problems, then come back with a TA that more people could have supported.
And no one would have known outside the MEC, the NC and the company negotiators. What the other employee groups think, or that whole dynamic you describe above would never have happened.
Nu
The MEC could have redirected the NC, they would have gone back in, fixed the problems, then come back with a TA that more people could have supported.
And no one would have known outside the MEC, the NC and the company negotiators. What the other employee groups think, or that whole dynamic you describe above would never have happened.
Nu
I'm reminded of the place Mr. Obama finds himself now. His health care bill was passed after the election of Scott Brown in Massachussetts via a flouting of the legislative process called "continuing resolution". It removed the newly elected Senator's right to vote on the bill, and it passed by 1 vote. The bill has now been a huge weight on him ever since, and it will very likely be judged as unconstitutional this week...only months before the election. All because the process was subverted.
Processes matter. They can often be cumbersome...but they are there for a reason. When they are ignored for expediency, the resulting unintended consequences are often devastating. My prediction for DALPA is that this single action by the MEC will result in the decertification of DALPA before our next section 6. Maybe not by DPA, but another in-house union drive.
Carl
#35
What if 52% of the survey applicants wanted a 35% raise day 1? How would that have worked? Does that really seem possible? Looking at what happened with the APA and the NMB, I don't think that would have worked. What do you do then? Do another survey saying "tone it down a bit?"
Carl
#37
Banned
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
I'm sorry to be so blunt about it Hook, but that's exactly what you'll be showing people like Mr. Campbell who was hired specifically for this purpose. A YES vote to something clearly insufficient in so many ways for a pilot group flying for the most profitable airline in the world will tell Mr. Campbell what is clear: A majority of Delta pilots are AFRAID of section 6 negotiations. Your/our future will be slightly different variations of early talks to produce more job sales...under threat of taking you to section 6 if you don't behave.
This is so much bigger than just this TA.
Carl
This is so much bigger than just this TA.
Carl
#38
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Sometimes the dealer has a better hand, but you could always go for a 3rd card while holding a pair of nines....go for it....
#39
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Yes, the alternate plan for the union is to go back to negotiating, but it could go on a couple more years for less money eventually. Do you really think a strike could ever be in the cards? Rule that out. So, the options are limited, and so was the offer. I think it's a pretty good offer for a 3 year contract though. It gets us in the direction we want to go pay wise, and improvements in many areas.
#40
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
This post illustrates what you so clearly misunderstand. It is NOT the job of the MEC administration to decide for the pilots what is achievable and what is not. This is a bottom-up union structure - and I KNOW you know that. Even if the MEC feels the pilot's survey was BAD for the pilot group, it is their JOB to produce those results. Even if it turns out that the MEC administration is correct and pushing for the survey results was a mistake, it DOES NOT MATTER because the pilot's will would have been done. THAT is the job of the MEC...to execute the will of the pilots through their elected local reps.
Carl
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
11
01-18-2017 07:53 PM



