Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Plan B?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2012 | 03:46 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That is ALWAYS the case with negotiations. Our MEC was very clear before this process began: "We will NOT sacrifice quality for expediency". If the early talks do not produce what the pilots have demanded via their surveys, we will revert to the normal section 6 process.

Now all RA has to say is: "Take it or leave it" and our MEC administration folds like cheap lawn furniture? Really?

The biggest problem we'll face going forward is that we'll have PROVEN to RA and Campbell that we are no different than the AirTran pilots. Toss a little fear out there, and we'll voluntarily give up any fight whatsoever. We will be bullied by our executive management for the foreseeable future if we prove to them we'll fold this easily.

Carl
Originally Posted by nerd2009
Well Said Carl.

Some of our Pilot group needs to grow a pair and turn down this TA.

The art of negotiation always places a time constraint on the deal.
Agree with all, spot on Carl.

Not sure why everyone thinks Plan B is going to be the end of the world.

I'd be happy to make a drinking man's bet that the B717's are coming regardless of the outcome from this TA.
Old 06-23-2012 | 04:50 AM
  #12  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That is ALWAYS the case with negotiations. Our MEC was very clear before this process began: "We will NOT sacrifice quality for expediency". If the early talks do not produce what the pilots have demanded via their surveys, we will revert to the normal section 6 process.

Now all RA has to say is: "Take it or leave it" and our MEC administration folds like cheap lawn furniture? Really?

The biggest problem we'll face going forward is that we'll have PROVEN to RA and Campbell that we are no different than the AirTran pilots. Toss a little fear out there, and we'll voluntarily give up any fight whatsoever. We will be bullied by our executive management for the foreseeable future if we prove to them we'll fold this easily.

Carl
Richard probably also told them this was the best they could do as well, so there was obviously no more to get.......
Old 06-23-2012 | 05:36 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
How about a source?
Deltanet - Richard Q&A: Midyear Update, 6/22/12
Old 06-23-2012 | 05:44 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Default

Your CEO tells you in no uncertain terms he will move on and take the money the pilots were going to get and use it for the alternate plan.

All the union negotiators in the room both pilot and professional all say this is it, the company will walk away if we say no.

I am not thrilled with what we got, I wanted more. But I don't cut off my nose to spite my face.

I don't view this as a test of manhood, bravado, etc. It is a business decision.

Capt. Hook
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:23 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hookshot123
Your CEO tells you in no uncertain terms he will move on and take the money the pilots were going to get and use it for the alternate plan.
Too funny. What would you expect a CEO to tell you?

"take the money the pilots were going to get..." Yeah, the brilliant CEO is just going to ignore that bill coming due and use it for the alternate plan without acknowledging the fact that at some point the pilots are going to have to be paid. So the brilliant CEO who is to be feared for the gospel that comes from his mouth is also able to convince his employees that he's just going to ignore the reality of having to pay his primary labor force. Got it. Do you realize this flies in the face of the logic that the company wants to settle this concern before it moves forward with its strategic plan? If it's not important to ensure the pilot contract is settled before moving forward then why did they come to us to knock it out sooner rather than later? The logic that they'll just forge ahead without settling this ignores the reality.

Originally Posted by hookshot123
All the union negotiators in the room both pilot and professional all say this is it, the company will walk away if we say no.
Again, you believe everything you're told. What would you expect to hear otherwise? Do you need them to come back with, "You guys really, really, really need to pass this TA, but if you don't we think we can get more like you originally wanted." ???? Seriously, that's what the alternative to what they're saying now. But because they won't and can't say that the truth has to be the opposite which is, "Guys, we did the absolute best that could be done; no one in this world could have done better--we are the best of the best, and therefore you need to pass this because it's impossible to do better than we did."

Originally Posted by hookshot123
I am not thrilled with what we got, I wanted more. But I don't cut off my nose to spite my face.

I don't view this as a test of manhood, bravado, etc. It is a business decision.

Capt. Hook
Frame it however you want so you can live with yourself, but in the end it the company and MEC are playing to your fears that lead pilots to taking the safest and known path. The psychologists on their payroll were a good investment.
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:39 AM
  #16  
Karnak's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jesse
Again, you believe everything you're told. What would you expect to hear otherwise?
I missed your post responding to the guys who jumped all over RA's and Mike Campbell's comments that the TA was "cost neutral".

You believe everything you're told?

This selective listening is bothersome. Please help me smack anybody who swallows anything these guys say. The key is to watch what they DO!

What they DO is - everything possible to prevent more unions from coming on the property. To that end, I predict they will not offer the pilots more in any sort of expedited manner. To do so would empower organizers within the other work groups at Delta to start drives. Organizers will capitalize on the success of rank-and-file union members "standing up" to management. They will counter the anti-union rhetoric from management by pointing out that it was individuals, through their votes, that brought Anderson to his knees and got the pilots a sweeter deal.

For that reason, RA will slow-play us.
Old 06-23-2012 | 07:01 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
I missed your post responding to the guys who jumped all over RA's and Mike Campbell's comments that the TA was "cost neutral".

You believe everything you're told?

This selective listening is bothersome. Please help me smack anybody who swallows anything these guys say. The key is to watch what they DO!
Build a straw man...got it.

Originally Posted by Karnak

What they DO is - everything possible to prevent more unions from coming on the property. To that end, I predict they will not offer the pilots more in any sort of expedited manner. To do so would empower organizers within the other work groups at Delta to start drives. Organizers will capitalize on the success of rank-and-file union members "standing up" to management. They will counter the anti-union rhetoric from management by pointing out that it was individuals, through their votes, that brought Anderson to his knees and got the pilots a sweeter deal.

For that reason, RA will slow-play us.
So where did they do or say anything to support your theory? Missed that part of your reasoning.
Old 06-23-2012 | 07:25 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 2
From: Capt
Default

Originally Posted by hookshot123
Your CEO tells you in no uncertain terms he will move on and take the money the pilots were going to get and use it for the alternate plan.

All the union negotiators in the room both pilot and professional all say this is it, the company will walk away if we say no.

I am not thrilled with what we got, I wanted more. But I don't cut off my nose to spite my face.

I don't view this as a test of manhood, bravado, etc. It is a business decision.

Capt. Hook
Yup, unions and airline managements ALWAYS tell the truth, Always. Changing my vote
Old 06-23-2012 | 07:28 AM
  #19  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That is ALWAYS the case with negotiations. Our MEC was very clear before this process began: "We will NOT sacrifice quality for expediency". If the early talks do not produce what the pilots have demanded via their surveys, we will revert to the normal section 6 process.

Now all RA has to say is: "Take it or leave it" and our MEC administration folds like cheap lawn furniture? Really?

The biggest problem we'll face going forward is that we'll have PROVEN to RA and Campbell that we are no different than the AirTran pilots. Toss a little fear out there, and we'll voluntarily give up any fight whatsoever. We will be bullied by our executive management for the foreseeable future if we prove to them we'll fold this easily.

Carl
+++++++++++717+++++++++++

constructive infringement. youre never allowed to say no to the first offer.
Old 06-23-2012 | 07:47 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Default

Sort of a mob mentality around here. It looks like we are done with rational discussion and moved on to making a yes vote a sign of personal weakness.

Capt. Hook
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
United
1
01-07-2012 09:57 AM
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
10
11-07-2011 01:07 PM
Cardinal
Major
0
11-04-2006 11:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices