Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SKW getting 100 MRJs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:29 AM
  #31  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
What prohibits them? MTOW? Can they be configured for 76 seats (Like the "90" seat CRJ 900) and flown legally?
Unless it dropped out, there is a MTOW limit in the contract.

A 747-400 is a 500+ seat airplane, but that doesn't mean you put in as many seats as you possibly can in it.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:35 AM
  #32  
etflies's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: KCCO
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Contracts don't expire, they become amendable.

They aren't amended unless a new agreement is reached. It doesn't just become void (Pinnacle's contract was amendable from 2005- an agreement was finally reached last year, CAL and UAL have been amendable for a while as well)
Thank you, that's what I thought but I wasn't sure if management slipped some sort of crafty verbiage in to allow these MRJs or something of that nature.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:39 AM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 391
Likes: 4
Default

Maybe the MRJs are for an AMR code share. What does their new TA allow, up to 79 seats? Maybe the contract with Mitsubishi has a contingency clause depending on the pilot TA and the BK precedings.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:47 AM
  #34  
NoHandHold's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: On The Jumpseat
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The new TA prohibits something that size from being flown by any of our regional carriers (except RAH) completely- doesn't matter who its being flown for.
O ok...what section is that under? And what is the exact language?

And do you honestly think that they will not find a way around that?
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 11:03 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by etflies
Not sure if it makes much of a difference, but if the TA expires in 2015 and these aren't even slated to show up til 2017, does it matter what the current TA says?

Honest question, btw.
Ha! True. With the number of yes votes, Delta is probably kicking themselves cause they couldve gotten a few more seats allowed. Next TA will probably add 5-10 more seats, at least..
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 11:08 AM
  #36  
Free Bird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Skywest cannot take delivery of these airplanes under the recently ratified TA. Not without us giving up scope...
6 months ago I would of bet lots of $$$ that DALPA would not give up more 70+ seat RJ's. Now, I'd be shocked if DALPA could ever truly hold the line in regards to SCOPE. The current contract is proof that something is always for sale with the Delta pilots.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 11:27 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 8
Default

So what does Deltas PWA say regarding scope?

Is it weight, certified seats?

If it's just seats and no other criteria then whats to stop them from farming out 25 737s that have 70 seats, all business class, coast-to-coast premium service to skywest?
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 11:40 AM
  #38  
nwaf16dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: 737A
Default

MTOW of the 51-76 jets in the DAL contract is 86000 lbs. There is a Compass only exception for 36 EMB-175's MTOW up to 89,000 lbs. According to the Mitsubishi website the MRJ-70STD MTOW is about 82000, and the MRJ-70ER is just under 86000. All the MRJ-90's are too big for our contract restrictions.

Last edited by nwaf16dude; 07-11-2012 at 11:49 AM. Reason: better source
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 11:43 AM
  #39  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Alright, let me see if I can help out the cause. Here are three excerpts from the PWA:

Section 1.B.46, the definition of what a permitted aircraft is for DCI:



Section 1.C where we say all flying is ours. Section 1.D where we exempt DCI (or category A operations) from 1.C. and then 1.B.11-13 where we define category A operations as DCI.

Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 12:00 PM
  #40  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Now the MRJ's:



For comparison purposes the specifications of the E-175 is here and you can find the E-190 stuff at http://www.embraer.com/en-US/Aeronaves/Pages/Home.aspx:
http://www.embraercommercialjets.com...wnload/137.pdf
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BHopper88
SkyWest
78
07-14-2012 03:26 PM
11Fan
Trans States Airlines
159
03-05-2010 07:15 PM
palgia841
Regional
18
12-11-2006 08:15 AM
JetJock16
Regional
37
12-06-2006 11:35 AM
JetJock16
Regional
44
11-30-2006 09:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices