Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SKW getting 100 MRJs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2012 | 09:27 AM
  #21  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
I agree. But it's only "giving up scope" if we get nothing in return. It's selling otherwise.
That's true. Given what we've seen in the past, it prob won't take much and we won't get to vote on it. (the bathtub rim/Moak sale...)
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:01 AM
  #22  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Skywest cannot take delivery of these airplanes under the recently ratified TA. Not without us giving up scope...
Well there you go.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:10 AM
  #23  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Well there you go.
Bill,

Doesn't this order concern you? It is for deliveries of 90 seat aircraft in a few years (Just in time for another section 6). The audacity of an airline to order these, or shall I say their arrogance and "gamble" that we, Delta Pilots, will allow them to fly the 90 seaters with the dangling of "extra money in our pockets".

The likely hood of the DCI flying these 90 seaters are High, why else would they gamble and order them?

TEN
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:12 AM
  #24  
NoHandHold's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: On The Jumpseat
Default

You guys...Lol.

Who says that they are gonna be flown for Delta???

If they are...it will be under Alaska, under Delta code shared flights.

Look for them to be flown for everybody else BUT Delta.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:17 AM
  #25  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by NoHandHold
You guys...Lol.

Who says that they are gonna be flown for Delta???

If they are...it will be under Alaska, under Delta code shared flights.

Look for them to be flown for everybody else BUT Delta.
The new TA prohibits something that size from being flown by any of our regional carriers (except RAH) completely- doesn't matter who its being flown for.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:21 AM
  #26  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The new TA prohibits something that size from being flown by any of our regional carriers (except RAH) completely- doesn't matter who its being flown for.
What prohibits them? MTOW? Can they be configured for 76 seats (Like the "90" seat CRJ 900) and flown legally?
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:23 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

Geez guys.... In skywests press release it clearly states these are fleet replacement airframes, not growth. They can be configured to meet the 76 seat scope limit. This could be more of a tactic to put pressure on bombardier, who knows. It's also an agreement in principle, not a firm order. Skywest/ expressjet also flys for unical and will surely be bidding on eagle flying in the near future. The airline buisness does not revolve and Delta.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:23 AM
  #28  
etflies's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: KCCO
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The new TA prohibits something that size from being flown by any of our regional carriers (except RAH) completely- doesn't matter who its being flown for.
Not sure if it makes much of a difference, but if the TA expires in 2015 and these aren't even slated to show up til 2017, does it matter what the current TA says?

Honest question, btw.
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:27 AM
  #29  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by etflies
Not sure if it makes much of a difference, but if the TA expires in 2015 and these aren't even slated to show up til 2017, does it matter what the current TA says?

Honest question, btw.
Contracts don't expire, they become amendable.

They aren't amended unless a new agreement is reached. It doesn't just become void (Pinnacle's contract was amendable from 2005- an agreement was finally reached last year, CAL and UAL have been amendable for a while as well)
Reply
Old 07-11-2012 | 10:28 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

From Brad Rich's memo:
"These 100 aircraft would be replacement aircraft for current ExpressJet and SkyWest Airlines fleets and are fully intended to fly under contract with major partners. They are not growth aircraft. The aircraft identified in the agreement in principle include the MRJ70 or MRJ90, which range from 70 to 90 seats. The configuration of seats would be determined by scope limitations and airline requirements at the time of delivery.
The intended delivery time frame would be from 2017 to 2020. While specific allocations are yet to be determined, we anticipate that aircraft would be delivered to both of SkyWest, Inc’s operating entities. I cannot overemphasize how important it is to remain competitive in our ability to accept these or any aircraft."

The nerve of Skywest management to try to run an airline.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BHopper88
SkyWest
78
07-14-2012 03:26 PM
11Fan
Trans States Airlines
159
03-05-2010 07:15 PM
palgia841
Regional
18
12-11-2006 08:15 AM
JetJock16
Regional
37
12-06-2006 11:35 AM
JetJock16
Regional
44
11-30-2006 09:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices