Kudos to JetBlue's Pilot Voting Committee!
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 320 F.O.
Posts: 1,386
Kudos to JetBlue's Pilot Voting Committee!
Wow JB management is doing a great job. Divide and conquer is working to a tee. Until we can stand together we will never move forward. Ronald Reagan said "if we can see agree on seven out of ten issues we can work together". We aren't all going to see eye to eye as we all have different positions and experiences in life but most of want to stand united (via a CBA) against our low pay/benefits situation. We need a CBA to move forward in this situation.
#92
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Wow JB management is doing a great job. Divide and conquer is working to a tee. Until we can stand together we will never move forward. Ronald Reagan said "if we can see agree on seven out of ten issues we can work together". We aren't all going to see eye to eye as we all have different positions and experiences in life but most of want to stand united (via a CBA) against our low pay/benefits situation. We need a CBA to move forward in this situation.
Pull your head out of your ###.
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 900
Hey new guy, the company has changed the label for profit sharing. There is not more "guaranteed profit sharing" of 5%. It is now "retirement advantage" of 5% deposited quarterly.
So, if you go back and read my earlier post, I said our profit sharing sucks. If you put in less than 5% of your own money, you're an idiot...
So, if you go back and read my earlier post, I said our profit sharing sucks. If you put in less than 5% of your own money, you're an idiot...
If you say it sucks, why do you keep defending it so much? How was what I said wrong? 5% of your money, 5% of company match and 3% company toss in = 13%. 13 minus 5 (your money) is 8%. Company contributes 8%, NOT 13%. Retirement advantage is profit sharing, not retirement. Sure they changed the name in a (obviously working) marketing move.
#94
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 9
Guys, you're making this harder than it is.
For those of us that have actually benefited from a real B-fund, there's NO comparision. Think of it this way...at UAL for example, they receive an additional 16% contribution (every 2 weeks) into their retirement fund. They didn't have to take out 5% of their check to get a match and bring it up to 16% -- they just received a "pure" contribution. At JetBlue we have to reduce our take home pay in order to receive the match. What if you could take that 5% you're taking out now and put it towards additional principal payments towards your mortgage? Your house would be paid off in 15 years instead of 30! That's the real difference.
I'm not saying it isn't smart money to be saving on your own for retirement; in fact when I used to receive benefits of a B-fund I still participated in a self funded IRA. But to say that JetBlue's retirement is on par with our peers (or "close enough") shows complete naivety to what your skill set is capable of earning.
For those of us that have actually benefited from a real B-fund, there's NO comparision. Think of it this way...at UAL for example, they receive an additional 16% contribution (every 2 weeks) into their retirement fund. They didn't have to take out 5% of their check to get a match and bring it up to 16% -- they just received a "pure" contribution. At JetBlue we have to reduce our take home pay in order to receive the match. What if you could take that 5% you're taking out now and put it towards additional principal payments towards your mortgage? Your house would be paid off in 15 years instead of 30! That's the real difference.
I'm not saying it isn't smart money to be saving on your own for retirement; in fact when I used to receive benefits of a B-fund I still participated in a self funded IRA. But to say that JetBlue's retirement is on par with our peers (or "close enough") shows complete naivety to what your skill set is capable of earning.
#95
They never claimed to be anything but a LCC offering cut rate pricing. Quite different than what JBU is offering. Besides, it's a different ballgame since 9-11. In case you haven't noticed, the business has been constantly evolving since deregulation. Doesn't matter anyway, it's a moot argument once the inevitable merger swallows you guys up.
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Now...back to your regularly scheduled JB union vs non-union bickering!
#97
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Airplane
Posts: 2,385
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 900
So, let me see if I've got this now. We used to have "profit sharing," but now it's called "retirement plus." It's essentially the same thing, just re-branded. So, our "retirement" is now at 13%, but we get no profit sharing unless we go over the threshold (try not to spend your $20 all in one place in that case). So, in the end, we've got the same thing we had last year: 13% if you count retirement + profit sharing. Now it's just 13% retirement and very little (if any) profit sharing.
If I'm misreading this, someone help the new guy out.....
If I'm misreading this, someone help the new guy out.....
#99
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Wow. Because I'm new, I get looked down on. Thanks. Great, they changed the name. Did it change the numbers? Profit sharing is NOT the same as retirement. Just because they change the name doesn't magically make it so.
If you say it sucks, why do you keep defending it so much? How was what I said wrong? 5% of your money, 5% of company match and 3% company toss in = 13%. 13 minus 5 (your money) is 8%. Company contributes 8%, NOT 13%. Retirement advantage is profit sharing, not retirement. Sure they changed the name in a (obviously working) marketing move.
If you say it sucks, why do you keep defending it so much? How was what I said wrong? 5% of your money, 5% of company match and 3% company toss in = 13%. 13 minus 5 (your money) is 8%. Company contributes 8%, NOT 13%. Retirement advantage is profit sharing, not retirement. Sure they changed the name in a (obviously working) marketing move.
I am clearly NOT defending our profit sharing plan. Can you read?
#100
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
So, let me see if I've got this now. We used to have "profit sharing," but now it's called "retirement plus." It's essentially the same thing, just re-branded. So, our "retirement" is now at 13%, but we get no profit sharing unless we go over the threshold (try not to spend your $20 all in one place in that case). So, in the end, we've got the same thing we had last year: 13% if you count retirement + profit sharing. Now it's just 13% retirement and very little (if any) profit sharing.
If I'm misreading this, someone help the new guy out.....
If I'm misreading this, someone help the new guy out.....
Hence I said our profit sharing (we don't really have any) sucks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post