Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
SWA/AirTran Pax Incident In The News.... >

SWA/AirTran Pax Incident In The News....

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SWA/AirTran Pax Incident In The News....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2013, 03:00 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 13
Default

Well done, Captain. Thanks for stepping up and at least trying to set the bar slightly higher for passenger behavior standards.
t1dude is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 03:39 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sandlapper223's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: More Drag
Posts: 447
Default

So, after kicking off the 100 or so, they ferried the plane empty then?
sandlapper223 is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 06:14 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SamFoxpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: B737/FO
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
One element of this is a great example of a growing pain as SWA becomes more legacy by the second.

Their quick turn mentality is ingrained into the fabric of their existance and part of that is giving massive authority to their FA's to be Drill Instructor-esque rulers of the cabin when it comes to pax compliance so they can get on their way. They're friendly and fun and tell jokes and do stand up comedy PA's and all that but you do not want to cost them an extra second on a turn or you will pay. They crack heads and the company backs them and the plan pushed out on time and they save a minute of block times a million flights a day every day = competitive productivity advantage.

Which is also why they taxi at takeoff power, beg for shortcuts in those rare instances when they don't get them anyway and bribe ATC to give them flagrant and highly illegal Most Favored Airline status as they're cleared out of sequence first out of a hold or someone else has to do a 270 so they can cut in from behind them to be number one for the numbers so they're 23 minutes early instead of only 22 minutes early.

But now they're growing up and becoming a big boy airline with big boy realities. Their secondary airport core business model is quietly being killed off because its outdated and ineffective. Their planes are getting bigger, their ops more complex, their turn times longer, their costs much, much higher and their competition far more dangerous.

But culture dies hard. Big group...non compliant for 2 minutes...kick em all off...power turn complete. Yeah, that dog don't hunt here no more. Welcome to the bigs.
Sounds like gloop is more interested in ranting about how much he hates SWA, than actually reading the article. The incident was on an AirTran aircraft operating with AirTran crew and procedures. With that said, I don't know the facts of the incident, so I will let those with more knowledge comment.
SamFoxpilot is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:30 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76 View Post
How long, in your expert opinion, should they wait for customer to comply with BASIC instructions? If they all speak English there shouldn't be a need to repeat SIMPLE instructions more than twice.
That wasn't even my point. SWA FA's are rulers of the cabin the likes of which I've never seen on any airline ever on a consistent basis. That's great, it really is, when you're catering to a fanboy audience at secondary airports, etc. But they are growing up, and this part of their culture will have to be reconciled with the reality of the industry; most of which lets pax walk all over them constantly.

The SWA FA cabin ruler compliance machine has crested the top of the coaster and run out of chain. Welcome to the legacies.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:33 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by SamFoxpilot View Post
Sounds like gloop is more interested in ranting about how much he hates SWA, than actually reading the article. The incident was on an AirTran aircraft operating with AirTran crew and procedures. With that said, I don't know the facts of the incident, so I will let those with more knowledge comment.
Same company for 2.5 years now. Oh yeah, "operated by" and all that. And its not SWA hate (there's plenty of that to legitamately go around) but part of their culture and even competitive advantage was strict cabin control no other airline has. I predict that will start to go away, their turn times get longer and longer and one day, hopefully, ATC neutrality to the SWA "mission" above all others.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:42 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 389
Default

This story is laughable. I am sure crew overreacted. Some FA's thing they are jailers instead of customer service oriented personnel to facilate the passengers travel. Use some common sense and be flexible with a large group of students. Patience and courtesy not threats and animosity.
vilcas is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:57 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Same company for 2.5 years now. Oh yeah, "operated by" and all that.
Sorry Gloop, you are completely wrong! A wholly owned subsidiary is just that and nothing more. Was Delta responsible for the extremely unfortunate accident in Lexington? That wholly owned subsidiary had been "operated by" Delta for a lot o longer than 2.5 years. This is a non event and the AirTran employees were operating according to AirTran procedures not those of SWA. At this point they are completely different operations. I can only assume that if this group had been on a SWA flight and decided not to comply with crew member instructions it would have been handled similarly.
shoelu is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:03 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
sandy69's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 172M
Posts: 32
Default

I've seen FA's tell passangers to turn off and put away there're phones, then sit in threre seats, break out threre phones and begin texting while the plane is taxing to the runway. After awhile passsangers dont take to the double standards and don't take the FA'S seriously anymore.
In this case maybe this was the crews last trip and they wanted an easy leg, kick off 100 plus passangers, easy leg for the cabin crew.
sandy69 is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:08 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
Sorry Gloop, you are completely wrong! A wholly owned subsidiary is just that and nothing more. Was Delta responsible for the extremely unfortunate accident in Lexington? That wholly owned subsidiary had been "operated by" Delta for a lot o longer than 2.5 years. This is a non event and the AirTran employees were operating according to AirTran procedures not those of SWA. At this point they are completely different operations. I can only assume that if this group had been on a SWA flight and decided not to comply with crew member instructions it would have been handled similarly.
OK, so DL is to Comair as SWA is to AirTran?

If this were a DL story and our FA's were still separate, would it be credible to point to a "north" versus "south" difference? It wouldn't matter to anyone and DL would still be in the hot seat about it.

And my point still stands. SWA FA's dominate the cabin the likes of which I've never seen anywhere else. I'm not saying that's good or bad, but I am saying that those days are numbered and it will be an interesting culture shift to watch.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:13 PM
  #20  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

gloopy- shoelu has a valid point.

FL FAs who have not "converted" are not WN FAs. They still utilize FL operation manuals and techniques.

Similar to right after DL consummated our merger, but we were still completely separate. It's just taken WN years longer to do what took us a matter of months...
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uboatdriver
Career Questions
3
07-03-2013 03:41 PM
MikeB525
Regional
94
07-23-2008 07:23 AM
Deuce130
Military
29
06-15-2007 11:10 PM
Airborne
Major
1
04-02-2007 07:49 AM
2cylinderdriver
Regional
28
09-17-2006 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices