Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Tracking Regional Outsourcing >

Tracking Regional Outsourcing

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Tracking Regional Outsourcing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2013, 12:00 AM
  #11  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
Number of flights is an inaccurate way to measure the impact of regional flying on mainline. Regional airlines are operating far far shorter flights than mainline. Delta's CR2 flying out of ATL averages 300nm per departure.

Block hours or available seat miles would be a far more accurate way of measuring the size of the regional sector vs mainline. If anyone has those number please do post.
Explain your reasoning. How is it "inaccurate?" Yes, contracted flights are shorter, and yes they have fewer seats. Do either of those two factors matter in any way with regards to the job of the flight crew? No. Quantity of quality pilot jobs is the only statistic that matters in reality, and since a flight (contract or mainline) usually requires the same flight crew staffing, the statistics posted are both relevant and important.

I'm a regional guy, and I'd love for regionals to collectively die. I will never celebrate a regional carrier gaining airframes whether it's my company or not.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 04:21 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,308
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800 View Post
Explain your reasoning. How is it "inaccurate?" Yes, contracted flights are shorter, and yes they have fewer seats. Do either of those two factors matter in any way with regards to the job of the flight crew? No. Quantity of quality pilot jobs is the only statistic that matters in reality, and since a flight (contract or mainline) usually requires the same flight crew staffing, the statistics posted are both relevant and important.

I'm a regional guy, and I'd love for regionals to collectively die. I will never celebrate a regional carrier gaining airframes whether it's my company or not.
Good post
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 05:35 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,414
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800:1433550
Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
Number of flights is an inaccurate way to measure the impact of regional flying on mainline. Regional airlines are operating far far shorter flights than mainline. Delta's CR2 flying out of ATL averages 300nm per departure.

Block hours or available seat miles would be a far more accurate way of measuring the size of the regional sector vs mainline. If anyone has those number please do post.
Explain your reasoning. How is it "inaccurate?" Yes, contracted flights are shorter, and yes they have fewer seats. Do either of those two factors matter in any way with regards to the job of the flight crew? No. Quantity of quality pilot jobs is the only statistic that matters in reality, and since a flight (contract or mainline) usually requires the same flight crew staffing, the statistics posted are both relevant and important.

I'm a regional guy, and I'd love for regionals to collectively die. I will never celebrate a regional carrier gaining airframes whether it's my company or not.
Airlines staff by block hours, not by flights. Pilots are paid by the hour not by the flight. Delta operates less flights than DCI but has more pilots than all the DCI pilots combined. DALPA got it right in the last contract when included block hour ratios in the language. One DCI crew can do 7 AGS/TRI/CHA flights in a day out of ATL but 2 Delta crews are needed to do an SFO turn. 7 legs vs 2, does that mean DCI domination in this case? Absolutely not.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 05:53 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MachJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 145
Default

I understand your point; however, when looking at the probability that a customer will buy a ticket on Delta and then get on an outsourced flight you have to divide by the number of flights not block hours.
MachJ is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 08:20 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,414
Default

Originally Posted by MachJ:1433639
I understand your point; however, when looking at the probability that a customer will buy a ticket on Delta and then get on an outsourced flight you have to divide by the number of flights not block hours.
The regionals are there primarily to feed mainline. So the probability they fly both is quite high.

Still, what should matter most to us is the amount of pilot jobs at mainline, which happens to be increasing, and which is determined primarily by block hours.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 08:25 AM
  #16  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by MachJ View Post
I understand your point; however, when looking at the probability that a customer will buy a ticket on Delta and then get on an outsourced flight you have to divide by the number of flights not block hours.
The probability there would more appropriately be measure by seats in your example.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 08:28 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,943
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
The regionals are there primarily to feed mainline.
Not anymore.

They now exist to replace mainline, as evidenced by routes such as the entire DL shuttle being outsourced where it's nearly 100% O&D, and many other routes such as DTW-MTY, LAX-SEA, LGA-RSW, JFK-DFW, the list goes on and on. There are routes that feed like CHS-ATL but mainline also has routes that feet out of the hub after connections. It's just as much about outsourcing for the sake of outsourcing.
contrails is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:22 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,212
Default

Wouldn't seats be a more accurate #? DL operates more large RJs, they and UAL probably have a closer # of outsourced seats.
Softpayman is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:36 AM
  #19  
Flies With The Hat On
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by contrails View Post
Not anymore.

They now exist to replace mainline, as evidenced by routes such as the entire DL shuttle being outsourced where it's nearly 100% O&D, and many other routes such as DTW-MTY, LAX-SEA, LGA-RSW, JFK-DFW, the list goes on and on. There are routes that feed like CHS-ATL but mainline also has routes that feet out of the hub after connections. It's just as much about outsourcing for the sake of outsourcing.
Correct.
flybywire44 is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 10:11 AM
  #20  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,596
Default

1Q 2013 DAL report:

Consolidated ASMs- 53,022,000
Mainline ASMs- 46,202,000
Regional ASMs- 6,820,000

So 12.8% of the Delta system ASMs are done by 3rd party carriers. Still far too much in my opinion.
Flyby1206 is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices