Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Legacy/Major pilots thoughts on UAS >

Legacy/Major pilots thoughts on UAS

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Legacy/Major pilots thoughts on UAS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2013 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default Legacy/Major pilots thoughts on UAS

FAA Releases Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Roadmap ? News Watch

I've posted this on some regional boards but I'm curious what you more "seasoned" guys think about this unmanmed aircraft stuff. I noticed this article in the latest ALPA fastread. I know they just did a test flight in the UK of an unmanned passanger aircraft that went flawlessly. I know this article isn't necessarily talking about pax aircraft, but do you guys think unmanned pax aircraft are closer than many think? Ive flown with a few guys who have been following this closely and many think we are less than 20 years away from this being a reality for pax flights. People might not go for it now, but in 15 years when most of our cars are driving us, I wonder if the public may feel differently.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 11:46 AM
  #2  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
FAA Releases Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Roadmap ? News Watch

I've posted this on some regional boards but I'm curious what you more "seasoned" guys think about this unmanmed aircraft stuff. I noticed this article in the latest ALPA fastread. I know they just did a test flight in the UK of an unmanned passanger aircraft that went flawlessly. I know this article isn't necessarily talking about pax aircraft, but do you guys think unmanned pax aircraft are closer than many think? Ive flown with a few guys who have been following this closely and many think we are less than 20 years away from this being a reality for pax flights. People might not go for it now, but in 15 years when most of our cars are driving us, I wonder if the public may feel differently.
I think the technology is very close, within 5-10years, but I don't think the public can be persuaded to get onboard an unmanned aircraft in that short of time. Hopefully that will take a lot longer
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 12:13 PM
  #3  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

One big problem is the time lag between investment and payoff. Even if the public and the FAA bought the idea, CEOs must be convinced that they will save lots of money with UAVs, and quickly recoup the heavy start-up costs. Today's managers know they won't be in office long, and aren't willing to hurt their own bottom line just to help the management team that replaces them.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

If the tickets are cheap enough, there are some people that will get on it.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 01:29 PM
  #5  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

I read a survey taken recently at I think the University of Missouri. A bunch of people were asked if they would fly on an unmanned airliner and nearly everyone said no. Then the same people were asked if they would do it if every ticket was $50. Almost everyone said yes.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 01:44 PM
  #6  
Tumbleweed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: 7ER
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
FAA Releases Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Roadmap ? News Watch

I've posted this on some regional boards but I'm curious what you more "seasoned" guys think about this unmanmed aircraft stuff. I noticed this article in the latest ALPA fastread. I know they just did a test flight in the UK of an unmanned passanger aircraft that went flawlessly. I know this article isn't necessarily talking about pax aircraft, but do you guys think unmanned pax aircraft are closer than many think? Ive flown with a few guys who have been following this closely and many think we are less than 20 years away from this being a reality for pax flights. People might not go for it now, but in 15 years when most of our cars are driving us, I wonder if the public may feel differently.
If you're talking about that Jetstream the British did a test flight in I would hardly consider it pilotless. They used a pilot to perform the takeoff and landing THEN the flight was controlled from the ground. Well whoopdee doo! Those are the two most critical phases of flight. If they consider that pilotless than most flights today are already pilotless considering the whole flight plan is loaded into the FMS and most pilots (sadly) just turn on the autopilot shortly after takeoff and keep it coupled until just moments prior to landing. The technology is certainly out there and yes, it's scary to consider its implications but I don't think that Jetstream poses much of a threat.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Where is my flying car and robot maid they promised 50 years ago?
JetBlast - search thread titles for UAV or Unmanned and you'll find lots of mature threads where this idea has been discussed in detail.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 02:34 PM
  #8  
The Drizzle's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

I think that in the future I won't be satisfied until I've ingested enough of the spice melange and I'm one of the few Navigators in the universe capable of folding the space between DCA and MCO.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 02:39 PM
  #9  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Tumbleweed
If you're talking about that Jetstream the British did a test flight in I would hardly consider it pilotless. They used a pilot to perform the takeoff and landing THEN the flight was controlled from the ground. Well whoopdee doo! Those are the two most critical phases of flight. If they consider that pilotless than most flights today are already pilotless considering the whole flight plan is loaded into the FMS and most pilots (sadly) just turn on the autopilot shortly after takeoff and keep it coupled until just moments prior to landing. The technology is certainly out there and yes, it's scary to consider its implications but I don't think that Jetstream poses much of a threat.
Much of the savings for going pilotless, aside from the obvious pilot costs are life support and human factors systems. With the "looming pilot shortage," the Jetstream test demonstrates a likely mid-phase solution and that is ground control with a pilot on board. It isn't "pilotless" - so its not scary to the pax.

It is, however, a threat to the piloting profession.
Reply
Old 11-08-2013 | 02:47 PM
  #10  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Where is my flying car and robot maid they promised 50 years ago?
JetBlast - search thread titles for UAV or Unmanned and you'll find lots of mature threads where this idea has been discussed in detail.
We've been hearing about the "aerospace plane" since I was a kid. New York to Tokyo in 2 hours, etc. The problem was not metallurgy, but instead the tech to make it work, primarily figuring out how to light the scramjet at high mach speeds. We cleared that hurdle about 3.5 years ago, but in the intervening time, the plane went from being piloted to pilotless.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flameout
Military
5
06-17-2010 05:10 PM
DYNASTY HVY
Major
41
05-19-2009 09:56 AM
Fletch727
Military
50
11-03-2008 01:47 PM
FXDX
Cargo
3
08-07-2007 07:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
14
04-25-2007 09:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices