![]() |
Originally Posted by VegassBus
(Post 2122733)
You must have me confused. Dementia already?
I never once thought we would have a contract by August That's right, you haven't been here long enough. You sure jumped on the sloper whine-wagon PDQ. |
|
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 2122743)
That's right, you haven't been here long enough. You sure jumped on the sloper whine-wagon PDQ.
|
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2122678)
Really!?! Look at any city pairs comparing SWA to Spirit. When you add one carry-on bag and one checked bag the cost of a spirit ticket is upwards of 25% more. How many people take only a purse or computer bag on a trip. GMAFB
Oh, did you see their earnings for the last 5 quarters! DFW/DAL to LAX/SNA WN $202.98 NK $143.09 DFW/DAL to ORD/MDW WN $221 NK $143.09 DFW/DAL to FLL WN $222 NK $173.09 What NK prices are you comparing to WN to get 25% more? |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2122838)
I just checked prices on three city pairs for 5/13. All NK flights had a $35 bag added. All non-stop. Lowest price flight selected. Prices below.
DFW/DAL to LAX/SNA WN $202.98 NK $143.09 DFW/DAL to ORD/MDW WN $221 NK $143.09 DFW/DAL to FLL WN $222 NK $173.09 What NK prices are you comparing to WN to get 25% more? |
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 2122839)
Those bags of peanuts and a small cup of drinks are not free. :rolleyes: That's the reason for the price difference.
Another GMAFB |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2122849)
If you're gonna compare please use the same cities, not some co-terminal logic. I also stated there was a carry-on bag fee included in the equation as well. Nice try! Same scam as Spirit's web site.
Another GMAFB |
Here at F9 we are getting the same sentiment from management, It's sad. Keep fighting for what's right, I do believe ULCC is the future model, but we should not be compensated as second tier.
|
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
(Post 2121673)
So there are "Tiers of a Clown"? :D
And yes, yes there are. |
Originally Posted by phoenix 23684
(Post 2122868)
Here at F9 we are getting the same sentiment from management, It's sad. Keep fighting for what's right, I do believe ULCC is the future model, but we should not be compensated as second tier.
|
Originally Posted by phoenix 23684
(Post 2122868)
Here at F9 we are getting the same sentiment from management, It's sad. Keep fighting for what's right, I do believe ULCC is the future model, but we should not be compensated as second tier.
Bob made it clear that we are on one tier, Jet Blue is above us, and then there are the Legacy carriers above them. I do believe we are still on a higher tier than freshly minted CFI's and some pt 135 C210 cargo operators, operating between 0200-0500 EDT. |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2122849)
If you're gonna compare please use the same cities, not some co-terminal logic. I also stated there was a carry-on bag fee included in the equation as well. Nice try! Same scam as Spirit's web site.
Another GMAFB Tomorrow prices SEA-LAS direct SWA $218 Spirit $133 + $35 + 30 for personal item, a carry on and a check bag. FLL -ATL direct SWA- $248 Spirit -$158 + $35 +$30 for the personal, carry on and a checked bag. |
Originally Posted by phoenix 23684
(Post 2122868)
Here at F9 we are getting the same sentiment from management, It's sad. Keep fighting for what's right, I do believe ULCC is the future model, but we should not be compensated as second tier.
GF |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 2122973)
What part of Ultra Low Cost Carrier is not understood?
GF Irony can be defined as an ex-Eastern pilot, like yourself, who struck in the 80s because Lorenzo felt your pilots were worth less than nothing, telling pilots today they should accept low wages because management says they are "low tier" for their ULCC airline. Sounds like something ol Frank Loreanzo would make a case for. |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 2122973)
What part of Ultra Low Cost Carrier is not understood?
GF Ask WN how they manage some of the highest wages in the industry all the while maintaining their "LCC" business model. |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 2122990)
Perhaps you have a comprehension issue on this one. "Cost," as it relates to the price of a ticket, not compensation. SWA proudly calls themselves a "Low Cost Airline," so I assume their employees (some of the highest all around in the industry) should take a lesser wage, simply because of the "low cost" in their business model.
Irony can be defined as an ex-Eastern pilot, like yourself, who struck in the 80s because Lorenzo felt your pilots were worth less than nothing, telling pilots today they should accept low wages because management says they are "low tier" for their ULCC airline. Sounds like something ol Frank Loreanzo would make a case for. Either way, GF gets a "High Five". Sadly, I'm about four short. Hope it'll do. |
Originally Posted by gringo
(Post 2122999)
You beat me to it.
Either way, GF gets a "High Five". Sadly, I'm about four short. Hope it'll do. Take a look at that earnings call and see how many millions this place wastes in mismanagement. Remember the meltdown last June? That cost $20 mil alone. They can afford to pay us what we are worth. In the meantime continue to call daily. I'm not picking up. Go find someone else to clean up your mess. And if you can't maybe this airlines prayers will get answered and Jyri and Bendo will be shown the door |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 2122973)
What part of Ultra Low Cost Carrier is not understood?
GF |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 2122973)
What part of Ultra Low Cost Carrier is not understood?
GF |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123067)
Exactly!! Hello?!!?
|
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 2122968)
Well since you quoted me for whatever reason, I'll play your game
Tomorrow prices SEA-LAS direct SWA $218 Spirit $133 + $35 + 30 for personal item, a carry on and a check bag. FLL -ATL direct SWA- $248 Spirit -$158 + $35 +$30 for the personal, carry on and a checked bag. |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123198)
Let's not forget the water, soft drinks, etc. You see if people don't avail themselves of ancillary items Spirit and Allegiant are dead! It is your cost structure that won't be able to support the "Bare Fare".
Clueless |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123198)
Let's not forget the water, soft drinks, etc. You see if people don't avail themselves of ancillary items Spirit and Allegiant are dead! It is your cost structure that won't be able to support the "Bare Fare".
|
Originally Posted by VegassBus
(Post 2123204)
Hahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahhahahahqahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaa
Clueless |
You know you're second tier when APC doesn't give you your own sub-forum ;)
Airline Pilot Forums - Airline Pilot Central Forums |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123198)
Let's not forget the water, soft drinks, etc. You see if people don't avail themselves of ancillary items Spirit and Allegiant are dead! It is your cost structure that won't be able to support the "Bare Fare".
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2123224)
Isn't that kind of the point. People will always buy extras just like Disney expects you to buy a $20 burger or more when you visit the park. Some won't buy it but most will and raising the ticket price to include lunch would probably scare people off especially those that don't want to $20 crappy burger. Pay for what you want not what you dont
All the way to the bank baby.... |
What exactly is your point here
|
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123229)
Yes I see how that philosophy has hurt Jet Blue and Southwest! Of course there's always gonna be the third tier passenger that can't figure out the scam!
All the way to the bank baby.... |
You guys are arguing with a crusty bitter pilot from SWA. Most of his posts are about "guard abuse"....haha....
Tell me more stories about the good ol days, Grandpa.... |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 2123243)
You guys are arguing with a crusty bitter pilot from SWA. Most of his posts are about "guard abuse"....haha....
Tell me more stories about the good ol days, Grandpa.... |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123245)
Nice try sonny...Wrong as usual...Let me know how that payday works out for you!
I'm not your guy, pal! The point is, we're not getting a payday. Hence, the low and worsening morale amongst the pilot group. |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2122678)
Really!?! Look at any city pairs comparing SWA to Spirit. When you add one carry-on bag and one checked bag the cost of a spirit ticket is upwards of 25% more. How many people take only a purse or computer bag on a trip. GMAFB
Oh, did you see their earnings for the last 5 quarters!
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 2122968)
Well since you quoted me for whatever reason, I'll play your game
Tomorrow prices SEA-LAS direct SWA $218 Spirit $133 + $35 + 30 for personal item, a carry on and a check bag. FLL -ATL direct SWA- $248 Spirit -$158 + $35 +$30 for the personal, carry on and a checked bag. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123245)
Nice try sonny...Wrong as usual...Let me know how that payday works out for you!
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2098329)
It is accurate; and I've been in airliners for 30+ years. It's usually the same type of individual that wants to be an FFDO. (Before you reply note I said "usually")
|
It's not rocket surgery.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/omribenshahar/2016/05/03/airlines-charge-for-that-its-a-good-deal/#47b8967b5a4f |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 2123254)
No, you are crusty. Sorry your "30+ years in airliners" has made you so grumpy
Peace Out!! |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123277)
No, just mature. Something you obviously know nothing about. When you act like a Greyhound bus driver guess what, you get treated like one!
Peace Out!! |
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123277)
No, just mature. Something you obviously know nothing about. When you act like a Greyhound bus driver guess what, you get treated like one!
Peace Out! |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 2123303)
Haha...says the crusty one who trolls internet forums, trying to compare paychecks...This is your idea of "mature"
|
Originally Posted by RadarColor
(Post 2123306)
Great comeback..how impressive! Just like your OJ pic...very mature!
And I never claimed to be mature...You're the one calling everyone out for not being mature, all the while demonstrating the maturity you would see from one of your grandchildren. Speaking of which...spend time with your grandkids, don't waste your golden years on these forums. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands