Just when you thought it was over, NWA tries to put it NWA/DAL together again.
#252
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Your negotiators had a good offer on the table. Eastern never had it so good. Eastern was never offered 40% raises and relative seniority into a larger fleet.
Eastern's war against Lorenzo was noble. Anderson is no Lorenzo. In this case Northwest is no Eastern and you should not wish such for your fellow pilots.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-10-2008 at 06:55 PM.
#253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Slowplay everytime I read your posts I think what a pompous jerk. If you want to justify what your mec is about to do go right ahead but make no mistake it's morally wrong. ... If the opposite was proposed I guarantee you that our mec would have shot that down in a heartbeat as repulsive and union busting. .... I would love for guys to come on up here to DTW and block our access to work while you picket for your premadonna positions. Come on up.
btw, I was flying airplanes pre-madonna...
#254
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Unfortunately $2 Billion in returns were squandered by the parties inability to reach a deal. The loss of 4 airlines to Chapter 7 and an additional bankruptcy this week, plus Steenland's push to merge without pilot participation probably have the board's full attention on ensuring that corporate economics are protected. If rammed through in the more traditional style, the DAL pilots have some contractual leverage to extract value, but it will probably be on a significantly lower scale than the "pre-nup" deal. I understand the NWA MEC is meeting today; I hope they have found leverage to improve the Northwest pilots current contractual position through a traditional path.
#255
It's going to be even worse trying to figure out how to merge 2005-hire captains...
#256
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Here is what has happened. It appears we are merging like it or not. The Delta contract has some scope that makes a merger difficult for management. They are offering contract improvements to DALPA to waive those items. (International Code Share Block Hours & RJ limits to name two). We would also agree not to oppose the merger. None of this has anything to do with NWA. If we were to agree then the company would merge the airlines. A PID would be started and DALPA and NWAALPA would begin the process to merge the lists like every other merger before this one. There would be split operations only until we had a combined list again like every other merger prior to this one. Once we had a list we would be one airline. At the same time a list was negotiated we would be working on a new combined contract to go into place with the actual merger date. This could take from 6 months to 2 years. The good news is if NWA wants arbitration they will get it on the SLI.
#257
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Anyone have the slightest idea what type of hourly rates they (DAL) were able to secure in the TA? Call me old fashioned or a bit of a historian - but it would take a lot more than a stake in the company to get me to jump on board if I worked there. Investing in my own airline? I already give them enough money. Hmmmm. Hope someone will post terms as they become available.
#258
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Think about it, if a junior captain gets displaced it is his relative seniority that determines what he can hold - the fact that he was captain does not normally merit any special consideration.
Scoop
Last edited by Scoop; 04-13-2008 at 11:39 AM.
#259
What difference does captain make? I assume there are some really senior FO's with a DOH much earlier then 2005. Do you think these 2005 captains should get special consideration over FO's that are senior to them? Your relative position on the seniority list is all that matters.
Think about it, if a junior captain gets displaced it is his realative seniority that determines what he can hold - the fact that he was captain does not normally merit any special consideration.
Scoop
Think about it, if a junior captain gets displaced it is his realative seniority that determines what he can hold - the fact that he was captain does not normally merit any special consideration.
Scoop
#260
My point is that part of the problem with DAL-NWA from the DAL side is that there are very junior people holding widebody F/O at DAL where this is a much more senior position at NWA. A CAL vs. UAL merger would be even more disparate, with 3-year CAL Captains potentially becoming junior to UAL F/O's who are presently 7 more years from the left seat. The guy who is about to be senior enough at CAL to hold EWR 737 Captain suddenly finds himself years from the left seat using DOH or ratio, which certainly has a negative impact on his career expectations. That is going to be uglier than the problem we're grappling with at DAL-NWA for sure.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post