Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
Just when you thought it was over, NWA tries to put it NWA/DAL together again. >

Just when you thought it was over, NWA tries to put it NWA/DAL together again.

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Just when you thought it was over, NWA tries to put it NWA/DAL together again.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2008, 06:27 PM
  #251  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

I'm hoping it is occuring right now.........[/quote]

But have you contacted your reps to make sure it's happening?
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 04-10-2008, 06:49 PM
  #252  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25 View Post
Actually my friend I do know my history. I'm refering to Lorezo's use of the holding company while bleeding Eastern to feed Continental. Not much different than what you and DAL have agreed to do....
But, it worked out for the Continental pilots.

Your negotiators had a good offer on the table. Eastern never had it so good. Eastern was never offered 40% raises and relative seniority into a larger fleet.

Eastern's war against Lorenzo was noble. Anderson is no Lorenzo. In this case Northwest is no Eastern and you should not wish such for your fellow pilots.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-10-2008 at 06:55 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:23 PM
  #253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Opus View Post
Slowplay everytime I read your posts I think what a pompous jerk. If you want to justify what your mec is about to do go right ahead but make no mistake it's morally wrong. ... If the opposite was proposed I guarantee you that our mec would have shot that down in a heartbeat as repulsive and union busting. .... I would love for guys to come on up here to DTW and block our access to work while you picket for your premadonna positions. Come on up.
It's nice that you can argue so cogently for your position using nothing but facts and without namecalling, Opus.

btw, I was flying airplanes pre-madonna...
slowplay is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:40 PM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
One good thing, when it's announced the need for secrecy will be gone. Then maybe we can see what's really on the table.
That will certainly be illuminating. While there are almost always multiple sides and shades of grey to a story, the light of day will provide an interesting context for an evaluation of the integrity, veracity, and efficacy of the parties.

Unfortunately $2 Billion in returns were squandered by the parties inability to reach a deal. The loss of 4 airlines to Chapter 7 and an additional bankruptcy this week, plus Steenland's push to merge without pilot participation probably have the board's full attention on ensuring that corporate economics are protected. If rammed through in the more traditional style, the DAL pilots have some contractual leverage to extract value, but it will probably be on a significantly lower scale than the "pre-nup" deal. I understand the NWA MEC is meeting today; I hope they have found leverage to improve the Northwest pilots current contractual position through a traditional path.
slowplay is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 05:43 AM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StripAlert's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Against
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne View Post
I'm pulling for you guys, all of you. But if the last few months of seniority integration talk is any indicator of how it will go now that CAL will be forced to merge with someone (probably UAL) I better start taking some anxiety meds. Good luck to all....
It's going to be even worse trying to figure out how to merge 2005-hire captains...
StripAlert is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:13 AM
  #256  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25 View Post
Actually my friend I do know my history. I'm refering to Lorezo's use of the holding company while bleeding Eastern to feed Continental. Not much different than what you and DAL have agreed to do....
RedDog, Delta has not agreed to anything like what you post. They have not been asked to agree to anything like that and never would. Just read your own contract at NWA and you will see that your contract as well as Delta's prohibits that type of operation. One Newspaper took the traditional merger concept and twisted into a separate operations for life deal. I am amazed that so many NWA pilots and some Delta pilots gave even a shred of credence to that story. The story then got reprinted by other papers
Here is what has happened. It appears we are merging like it or not. The Delta contract has some scope that makes a merger difficult for management. They are offering contract improvements to DALPA to waive those items. (International Code Share Block Hours & RJ limits to name two). We would also agree not to oppose the merger. None of this has anything to do with NWA. If we were to agree then the company would merge the airlines. A PID would be started and DALPA and NWAALPA would begin the process to merge the lists like every other merger before this one. There would be split operations only until we had a combined list again like every other merger prior to this one. Once we had a list we would be one airline. At the same time a list was negotiated we would be working on a new combined contract to go into place with the actual merger date. This could take from 6 months to 2 years. The good news is if NWA wants arbitration they will get it on the SLI.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:19 AM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne View Post
Anyone have the slightest idea what type of hourly rates they (DAL) were able to secure in the TA? Call me old fashioned or a bit of a historian - but it would take a lot more than a stake in the company to get me to jump on board if I worked there. Investing in my own airline? I already give them enough money. Hmmmm. Hope someone will post terms as they become available.
There is no TA at the moment. As has been nearly every other article published on the merger they press has it wrong. There may be a TA this weekend but as of Friday night there was not a TA.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:26 AM
  #258  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by StripAlert View Post
It's going to be even worse trying to figure out how to merge 2005-hire captains...
What difference does captain make? I assume there are some really senior FO's with a DOH much earlier then 2005. Do you think these 2005 captains should get special consideration over FO's that are senior to them? Your relative position on the seniority list is all that matters.
Think about it, if a junior captain gets displaced it is his relative seniority that determines what he can hold - the fact that he was captain does not normally merit any special consideration.
Scoop

Last edited by Scoop; 04-13-2008 at 11:39 AM.
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 09:36 AM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StripAlert's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Against
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
What difference does captain make? I assume there are some really senior FO's with a DOH much earlier then 2005. Do you think these 2005 captains should get special consideration over FO's that are senior to them? Your relative position on the seniority list is all that matters.
Think about it, if a junior captain gets displaced it is his realative seniority that determines what he can hold - the fact that he was captain does not normally merit any special consideration.
Scoop
My point is that part of the problem with DAL-NWA from the DAL side is that there are very junior people holding widebody F/O at DAL where this is a much more senior position at NWA. A CAL vs. UAL merger would be even more disparate, with 3-year CAL Captains potentially becoming junior to UAL F/O's who are presently 7 more years from the left seat. The guy who is about to be senior enough at CAL to hold EWR 737 Captain suddenly finds himself years from the left seat using DOH or ratio, which certainly has a negative impact on his career expectations. That is going to be uglier than the problem we're grappling with at DAL-NWA for sure.
StripAlert is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 09:58 AM
  #260  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by StripAlert View Post
My point is that part of the problem with DAL-NWA from the DAL side is that there are very junior people holding widebody F/O at DAL where this is a much more senior position at NWA. A CAL vs. UAL merger would be even more disparate, with 3-year CAL Captains potentially becoming junior to UAL F/O's who are presently 7 more years from the left seat. The guy who is about to be senior enough at CAL to hold EWR 737 Captain suddenly finds himself years from the left seat using DOH or ratio, which certainly has a negative impact on his career expectations. That is going to be uglier than the problem we're grappling with at DAL-NWA for sure.
And this is why mergers will always suck for someone unless your seniority #1. And then of course the guy who is #2 will be ****ed he got bumped from #1 at his previous carrier.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
19
02-15-2006 06:12 PM
LDmax
Major
0
01-28-2006 12:57 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
08-12-2005 03:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices