Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Delta Only contract?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2008, 01:06 PM
  #31  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
This is one of the problems - airplanes. Just today it was announced that the 787 got delayed again. NW is shrinking, DAL is stagnent (parking some jets, but orders coming in as we speak to cancel this out). Where are all the DC-9 FO's going to go when they are parked? They will bump DAL FO's. NW has stopped hiring, is receiving no aircraft, and is parking aircraft. Yes there will be retirements and aircraft in the future but how many and when? Today NW is shrinking and DAL is not. DAL will also have more aircraft orders and pilot retirements in the future. So its ok to talk about your future business model but its not ok to talk about ours? Look at what you typed
I personally do not like the idea of a seperate contract for DAL but from what I have heard from the MEC - the DAL pilots have been very reasonable so far and the NW MEC from the start has been very aggresive in its demands. I just hope we can work this out instead of being forced into a shotgun marriage type of agreement.
Scoop

It always make me giggle that you DAL guys always leave out the part about you parking planes and that the md80s are just as at risk as our dc9s.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:09 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
AV8ER13's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: NWA 747-200 SO
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER View Post
Have you stood up and told your MEC and all Captains that you fly with that the treatment they gave the Republic guys was despicable? I have never heard any red book guys say "I'm not going to the 747 Captain slot at 18 years seniority. That would be immoral to the Republic guys with 30 years seniority!" Red book guys benefited off the green book guys since the merger happened and there was never an ounce of protest from the NWA herd. So please don't tell me that DALPA is reaching a new low by trying to benefit its group in a merger. Right now this is all theory. The Red book history is exactly that, factual history based on past actions.
No I have not, BECAUSE I WAS NOT AROUND DURING THAT MERGER, I am not a red book or a green book. I agree it was wrong, I think it speaks volumes on your character that you are willing to step to that level! You even said it was "despicable" but then you are willing to do it. WOW! AGAIN, that way of thinking is not going to get us anywhere. Shame on you for calling one person out and then defending yourself to do it to someone else!
AV8ER13 is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:13 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

AV8ER13,

A merged list with no fences, and a "no bump, no flush" provision means that yes, a DAL guy that wanted to fly a 747 400 could bid into it, but only if there is an opening from a retirement or "bid out." He could not "bump" a junior person out of a seat that he wants. Of course it would go the other way as well if there was an opening on a DAL jet. I'm not familiar with DAL's displacement bid process. We don't have separate award and displacement bids at NWA.

I say NWA or DAL guy, but hopefully if this merger goes through there will only be DAL guys and no more Red/Green/Blue/Delta/Real Delta crap going on.

Caveat all that with the fact that I have no idea what is actually being discussed. Lots of wild speculation and rumor here and elsewhere right now. Try not to get too caught up in it. Call or e-mail your reps.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:23 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
AV8ER13's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: NWA 747-200 SO
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude View Post
AV8ER13,

A merged list with no fences, and a "no bump, no flush" provision means that yes, a DAL guy that wanted to fly a 747 400 could bid into it, but only if there is an opening from a retirement or "bid out." He could not "bump" a junior person out of a seat that he wants. Of course it would go the other way as well if there was an opening on a DAL jet. I'm not familiar with DAL's displacement bid process. We don't have separate award and displacement bids at NWA.
.
I understand all that, but then would the DAL pilot be more senior within the fleet than the NWA pilot? Would he get his monthly bid for QOL before the NWA pilot?
AV8ER13 is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:28 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

If his seniority number is lower, yes.

Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?

Last edited by nwaf16dude; 04-09-2008 at 01:28 PM. Reason: spelling
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:40 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by AV8ER13 View Post
No I have not, BECAUSE I WAS NOT AROUND DURING THAT MERGER, I am not a red book or a green book. I agree it was wrong, I think it speaks volumes on your character that you are willing to step to that level! You even said it was "despicable" but then you are willing to do it. WOW! AGAIN, that way of thinking is not going to get us anywhere. Shame on you for calling one person out and then defending yourself to do it to someone else!
Step to what level? And who am I calling out? You are going around throwing stones at DALPA. I merely asked if you had protested to the NWA MEC or anyone you fly with on how the red book/green book was detrimental to many aviators within your ranks. My character is quite high if you knew me. But my character has nothing to do with closed door negotiations. As I understand it, your MEC wouldn't budge on the SLI issue. You would have gotten much more substantial increases in pay, working conditions, retirement, etc. than I would have on a percentage basis. Yet your negotiating team wanted one more benefit. Better seniority. That would have been screwed me. Are you defending that? Don't know. Let me know that you would have told your negotiating committee to pound sand if anything was done at the expense of the DAL pilot group.

If the merger is going to happen it is going to happen. If the bar is raised by one group the other will come up to it. If you raise it, great. If we do, fine. Either way, I don't want a merger where my seniority is significantly impacted with no increases in pay, working conditions, retirement, etc. If I hit the street so you can keep your job are you going to volunteer to be in my place? Failure to do so means that you look out for yourself and your family. And I wouldn't blame you. I'd do the same. The problem is we live in a world where pilots are extremely territorial. We're all for the profession until we have to personally sacrifice. You voted for your MEC. They will defend you. I voted for mine. So I expect them to protect me.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:41 PM
  #37  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude View Post
If his seniority number is lower, yes.

Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
Better not be true, the DAL guys already screwed the pooch for the whole industry the first time with scope and we dont need round 2. DAL guys? Tell me you learned from the last time!
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:43 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude View Post
If his seniority number is lower, yes.

Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
I hope we're all smarter than that. Pandora's box was opened in '92 when the first RJ hit the skies. Thousands of aircraft later there is no closing it. Let's hope they don't ever relax scope again. I will do so only for $2,000,000. That's what I figure I would lose while on furlough and lost time for upgrade, etc.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:45 PM
  #39  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER View Post
I hope we're all smarter than that. Pandora's box was opened in '92 when the first RJ hit the skies. Thousands of aircraft later there is no closing it. Let's hope they don't ever relax scope again. I will do so only for $2,000,000. That's what I figure I would lose while on furlough and lost time for upgrade, etc.
This is something i think both pilot groups know CAN NOT happen. We are in complete agreement.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 04-09-2008, 01:57 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
AV8ER13's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: NWA 747-200 SO
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER View Post
Yet your negotiating team wanted one more benefit. Better seniority. That would have been screwed me. Are you defending that? Don't know. Let me know that you would have told your negotiating committee to pound sand if anything was done at the expense of the DAL pilot group.
I didnt say whether DAL or NWA's proposed mergerd list was better, what I said is if one side feels they get more of a say then that is what is wrong. And you say NWA wanted one more benefit, Again, I am not saying which is better (I am playind devils advocate), but did the NWA pilots not earn senority through DOH. Tell me its fair that a guy who has less yrs of service with either company gets to be more senior at the new company just b.c. their pilot group bailed when they could. Vice versa, it sucks have great senority and being told by someone who has a high DOH that he is going to push you down. Both angles SUCK! I dont get a say, I am a recent new hire at NWA and I know where I fall on the SLI. What makes me frustrated is reading that you feel b.c. you work for DAL that you vote counts more than mine (even though I do not have one now). You know what I mean, this threat was not started as a bash on DAL or NWA, the thread was about an article saying DAL mgmt is trying to agree only with DAL pilots and leave NWA out. Thats not fair, and I would be heart broken if any DAL pilot that thinks thats fair!
AV8ER13 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
TwoDogs
Major
11
02-21-2008 05:05 AM
Sir James
Major
0
10-16-2005 09:14 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices