Delta Only contract?
#31
This is one of the problems - airplanes. Just today it was announced that the 787 got delayed again. NW is shrinking, DAL is stagnent (parking some jets, but orders coming in as we speak to cancel this out). Where are all the DC-9 FO's going to go when they are parked? They will bump DAL FO's. NW has stopped hiring, is receiving no aircraft, and is parking aircraft. Yes there will be retirements and aircraft in the future but how many and when? Today NW is shrinking and DAL is not. DAL will also have more aircraft orders and pilot retirements in the future. So its ok to talk about your future business model but its not ok to talk about ours? Look at what you typed
I personally do not like the idea of a seperate contract for DAL but from what I have heard from the MEC - the DAL pilots have been very reasonable so far and the NW MEC from the start has been very aggresive in its demands. I just hope we can work this out instead of being forced into a shotgun marriage type of agreement.
Scoop
I personally do not like the idea of a seperate contract for DAL but from what I have heard from the MEC - the DAL pilots have been very reasonable so far and the NW MEC from the start has been very aggresive in its demands. I just hope we can work this out instead of being forced into a shotgun marriage type of agreement.
Scoop
It always make me giggle that you DAL guys always leave out the part about you parking planes and that the md80s are just as at risk as our dc9s.
#32
Have you stood up and told your MEC and all Captains that you fly with that the treatment they gave the Republic guys was despicable? I have never heard any red book guys say "I'm not going to the 747 Captain slot at 18 years seniority. That would be immoral to the Republic guys with 30 years seniority!" Red book guys benefited off the green book guys since the merger happened and there was never an ounce of protest from the NWA herd. So please don't tell me that DALPA is reaching a new low by trying to benefit its group in a merger. Right now this is all theory. The Red book history is exactly that, factual history based on past actions.
#33
AV8ER13,
A merged list with no fences, and a "no bump, no flush" provision means that yes, a DAL guy that wanted to fly a 747 400 could bid into it, but only if there is an opening from a retirement or "bid out." He could not "bump" a junior person out of a seat that he wants. Of course it would go the other way as well if there was an opening on a DAL jet. I'm not familiar with DAL's displacement bid process. We don't have separate award and displacement bids at NWA.
I say NWA or DAL guy, but hopefully if this merger goes through there will only be DAL guys and no more Red/Green/Blue/Delta/Real Delta crap going on.
Caveat all that with the fact that I have no idea what is actually being discussed. Lots of wild speculation and rumor here and elsewhere right now. Try not to get too caught up in it. Call or e-mail your reps.
A merged list with no fences, and a "no bump, no flush" provision means that yes, a DAL guy that wanted to fly a 747 400 could bid into it, but only if there is an opening from a retirement or "bid out." He could not "bump" a junior person out of a seat that he wants. Of course it would go the other way as well if there was an opening on a DAL jet. I'm not familiar with DAL's displacement bid process. We don't have separate award and displacement bids at NWA.
I say NWA or DAL guy, but hopefully if this merger goes through there will only be DAL guys and no more Red/Green/Blue/Delta/Real Delta crap going on.
Caveat all that with the fact that I have no idea what is actually being discussed. Lots of wild speculation and rumor here and elsewhere right now. Try not to get too caught up in it. Call or e-mail your reps.
#34
AV8ER13,
A merged list with no fences, and a "no bump, no flush" provision means that yes, a DAL guy that wanted to fly a 747 400 could bid into it, but only if there is an opening from a retirement or "bid out." He could not "bump" a junior person out of a seat that he wants. Of course it would go the other way as well if there was an opening on a DAL jet. I'm not familiar with DAL's displacement bid process. We don't have separate award and displacement bids at NWA.
.
A merged list with no fences, and a "no bump, no flush" provision means that yes, a DAL guy that wanted to fly a 747 400 could bid into it, but only if there is an opening from a retirement or "bid out." He could not "bump" a junior person out of a seat that he wants. Of course it would go the other way as well if there was an opening on a DAL jet. I'm not familiar with DAL's displacement bid process. We don't have separate award and displacement bids at NWA.
.
#35
If his seniority number is lower, yes.
Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
Last edited by nwaf16dude; 04-09-2008 at 01:28 PM. Reason: spelling
#36
No I have not, BECAUSE I WAS NOT AROUND DURING THAT MERGER, I am not a red book or a green book. I agree it was wrong, I think it speaks volumes on your character that you are willing to step to that level! You even said it was "despicable" but then you are willing to do it. WOW! AGAIN, that way of thinking is not going to get us anywhere. Shame on you for calling one person out and then defending yourself to do it to someone else!
If the merger is going to happen it is going to happen. If the bar is raised by one group the other will come up to it. If you raise it, great. If we do, fine. Either way, I don't want a merger where my seniority is significantly impacted with no increases in pay, working conditions, retirement, etc. If I hit the street so you can keep your job are you going to volunteer to be in my place? Failure to do so means that you look out for yourself and your family. And I wouldn't blame you. I'd do the same. The problem is we live in a world where pilots are extremely territorial. We're all for the profession until we have to personally sacrifice. You voted for your MEC. They will defend you. I voted for mine. So I expect them to protect me.
#37
If his seniority number is lower, yes.
Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
#38
If his seniority number is lower, yes.
Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
Next question for the DAL guys...latest wacky rumor (at least I hope it's a wacky rumor) is that DAL is talking about giving up 100 seat scope as part of this negotiation so that the merged airline will be able to get rid of all the DC-9s. Have you guys heard that one, and if so, what do you think?
#39
I hope we're all smarter than that. Pandora's box was opened in '92 when the first RJ hit the skies. Thousands of aircraft later there is no closing it. Let's hope they don't ever relax scope again. I will do so only for $2,000,000. That's what I figure I would lose while on furlough and lost time for upgrade, etc.
#40
Yet your negotiating team wanted one more benefit. Better seniority. That would have been screwed me. Are you defending that? Don't know. Let me know that you would have told your negotiating committee to pound sand if anything was done at the expense of the DAL pilot group.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post