Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable >

Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2008, 06:37 PM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
keenster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: FO forever
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by rvr350 View Post
Good work, Jay. I think we're pulling up the same data for Keenster. (Just wait until Carl refuses to believe it until he sees it with his own eyes I think regarding people moving around bases, except DTW/JFK, we'll see a significant amount of pilots bidding out of MSP to SLC/LAX, and a smaller amount bidding from DTW to ATL (FL commuters). DTW is a great airport, but when I was working there, about 75% pilots commute out to either NE/SE.

And there's no monetary/QOL amount that NWA can put on the table for the DL newbies.

As a general rule more NWA pilots commute to DTW than any other base. Most MSP guys live there so probably not many of them will leave- their brains are frozen and they actually think that quality of life in MSP is really good. ANC guys most of them live there and love it. Seattle guys Most of them live there and love it. I would say the only shift would be the Florida commuters maybe bidding into ATL. Other base changes would probably be minimal.
keenster is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:01 PM
  #242  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spliff View Post
my MEC is staying positive, which is what LOA 19 requires. off the record, I think many of them expect this to go to arbitration.

nothing in their recent experience w/NWA negotiators indicates that there will be any agreement on SLI; arbitration is the next step. I'd much rather try that then get bent over by NWA's version of a "fair" SLI.

you're a junior guy at NWA...do you really think there should be 2,000-3,000 DAL guys below you? sure it would be nice--but is it even remotely realistic?

I wouldn't be too worried about me disagreeing with my MEC, when yours bypassed some very strong pre-merger incentives which have come and gone, and squandered a great deal of leverage in the process...and is still minus a transitional agreement. shoot, that may even mean it will take a couple of years or more for NWA to get up to DAL pay levels (as pathetic as they are)...certainly not what either one of us want. But no need to blame us.

Maybe you should disagree with your MEC.

in any case, I hope we can put this unpleasantness behind us as quickly as possible so we can start trying to restore this profession.

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! My statement wasn't an attack, it was merely a question. And it was the DAL MEC that walked away from the table because they didn't like the last SLI proposal. And no, I don't think there should be 2000-3000 DAL newhires below me, and neither does the NWA MEC. DO NOT try to blame the break down in talks on the NWA guys, DAL guys are just as guilty. When two sides can't come to an agreement, then they have BOTH failed. I don't know why you think you'd get bent over with the NWA proposed SLI, and I certainly don't know where you got 2000-3000 DAL below NWA newhires.

You said you wanted arbitration, which DALPA is against, but has agreed with since it's in the ALPA merger policy. I simply asked if you disagreed with your MEC. I think your attack was a little unecessary.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:49 PM
  #243  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by keenster View Post
Man that was some great work but only one problem. You did not add the 1240 NWA guys senior to me to the 1728 delta guys putting my new number around 2968.
There was really no way to do this as I would need the all the widebody stats for NWA as well, because if I were to add the 1240 NW guys, then I would need to add all the NW flying options, not just DAL's.

Get my meaning? If you were to use a number of 2968, then you'd have to look at 330 & 747 (and all your 757's as that pay should come up to 767 under a joint contract) and all of DAL's heavy pay flying.
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:51 PM
  #244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by rvr350 View Post
Just wait until Carl refuses to believe it until he sees it with his own eyes

LOL. That's really funny because I was thinking the exact same thing as I was typing.
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:55 PM
  #245  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by keenster View Post
I would say the only shift would be the Florida commuters maybe bidding into ATL. Other base changes would probably be minimal.
I partly agree in that I think the redtails move into ATL is going to be BIG. I also seem to remember reading that you guys had a good amount of LAX types?
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 08:20 PM
  #246  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by keenster View Post
Seems as if none of our orders and options count but the Delta ones do.
Funny, I heard the same thing but exactly the opposite. I also heard that NW wanted to fence off their widebodies, but that DALs were fair game. And I sat in the crew lounge and had a rep tell me that one of the NW positions had the bottom 2000 of our guys stapled.

Look, this "I heard this or that" is going to get us nowhere. The table positions of both sides from SLI #1 are not in print, they won't be in print, and the only people who know what they actually were are those that were in the room. And they agreed that they can't be used as ammunition in future negotiations/arbitrations, so they are done, moot, irrelevant.

We've lost a load of money already by not getting this thing done in the first place, and I think it's largely because of egos. Who cares if you lose some numbers if after the smoke clears, the big picture has you just as good or better off than when you started? And at a massive carrier to boot. And I'm not talkin' just DAL & NWA.

With the new joint venture between DAL and Air France, your basically going to have one MONSTER airline of Air France, Delta and KLM. Oh yeah, Air France is also knockin' on the buyout door of a little Italian outfit called Alitalia.

But really, my prediction now:

We're going to end up down the same old road of:
-NW comes out of extreme left feild
-DAL comes out of extreme right
-fight to the near death, and
-go to arbitration

Then we'll get to see whose ideas of "premium widebody" or "firm orders" or "options" or "my retirements" or "your retirements" or "age 65/60" or whatever you want to pile on there, the arbitrator agrees with.

Then we'll either hate each other, or move on and deal with it, or start ousting unions, or sue each other.......blah, blah, blah....

I'm growing tired of the whole thing already
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 03:56 AM
  #247  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

NWA has finally put the Delta opener out in print to their pilots. It was the straight ratio mentioned on here many times and that several NWA pilots stated was not the DALPA opener. I would still like to see NWA's opener. Its the key to understanding why the process failed. Several Delta reps have stated that the the NWA opener did in fact take the first 1000 spots, a limited number of Delta pilots in the next 1000 spots and then a 1 to 1 ratio after that leaving almost 2000 Delta pilots at the bottom. It would be nice to see in print from NWA what the truth actually is. I don't believe that would have been their opener but the refusal to put it out makes one wonder.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:18 AM
  #248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

After working for NWA for 13+ years I am sick and tired of the Red/Green/Blue issues. The bottom line is we are ALL going to be Delta pilots and my hope isn't that we have "old NWA and old DAL". Everyone has an idea of what is fair and what is not. I do believe that there needs to be a meeting in the middle for all of us or life will suck.

Trust me when I say the division can hurt everyone. The Red/Green issue had the two groups battling all the time and being assessed fees for legal fights against each other. The resentment in the cockpit because a green guy was pulling gear for someone 1000+ numbers junior to him was terrible. The blue guys got to sit around and watch NWA ALPA focus too much time trying to ease this situation instead of working for some unity. Even to this day you can see a persons employee number and determine if he is red, green, or blue. This also determines the conversations within the cockpit so things don't get too heated.

We as pilots need to speak to our respective reps and tell them how you feel and what you think is fair. Both sides need to be realistic about what they each bring to the table as far as growth, planes, pilots, and career expectations. From what I am hearing I believe both sides are overly optimistic on what they bring to the table and think the other side doesn't have near as much to offer the combined entity as they do.

I for one am looking forward to flying with all the Delta pilots. As for NWA guys running to ATL and LAX, I don't think there is too much to worry about. Unless there is an opening nobody can be bumped. I will admit that some FL commuters may try ATL to shorten the distance, but my bet is guys will go where the schedules do them the most good. For me having QOL is more important than the actual base I fly out of.

Just my $.02 worth.......
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:36 AM
  #249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 847
Default

[quote=johnso29;376234
You said you wanted arbitration, which DALPA is against, but has agreed with since it's in the ALPA merger policy. I simply asked if you disagreed with your MEC. I think your attack was a little unecessary.[/quote]

Ok...I don't disagree with their desire to avoid arbitration...but if avoiding arbitration means getting thrown under the bus below every single NWA pilot, I'd prefer to roll the dice and see what comes up with an arbitrator.
Spaceman Spliff is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:58 AM
  #250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Default

NWA320pilot,

That was well said. I've flown with ex-Northeast guys, ex-Western guys, and ex-Pan Am guys, some of which were former National pilots. It gets old fast when you hear the "Wah, wah, wah, I got screwed..." mantra time and time again.

With regard to the "firm order" vs "option" debate:

Shortly after 9/11 I heard Fred Reid (Delta's then COO) speak in SLC. Now, I put Fred Reid in the same category as George W. Bush, a complete buffoon. But anyway, he said: "Delta was "contractually obligated to take delivery of every aircraft we had on order with Boeing for the next 18 months. We were getting a new aircraft at the rate of about one a week, so that was approximately 100 new aircraft."

So how many of those 100 new aircraft did we actually get? I don't know the exact number. But it was a heck of a lot less than 100. For a couple of years Delta was taking big write-offs for not taking new aircraft that they had on order. IIRC, in 2005 Delta took a $28 Million charge to not accept seven or eight new 737-800's.

Someone posted that Delta had orders for 21 more 767-400's. I was under the impression that Boeing had shut down the 767 production line. Would Boeing restart that line to produce those aircraft? My gut is they'd try to move Delta into some 777's instead.

With the 787 order book so far, out the NWA 787 orders have probably have significant cash value. That is, NWA or DAL could sell those positions (or aircraft) to other carriers, and make some money doing it.
Wasatch Phantom is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices