Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

NWA Code A Phone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2008, 08:44 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 847
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch View Post
For those of us in the trenches at NWA, looking down the barrel of taking all of the furloughs for the new Delta because of a back stabbing contract with a no furlough clause for one group. I don't find it so petty.
Have you taken this issue up with your MEC?

Last time I checked, the DALPA MEC is not authorized to bargain on your behalf.

I sincerely hope you are able to negotiate an even better TA than we have--it will only raise the bar for our combined PWA down the road.

But in the meantime, take it up with your MEC negotiators--and put the blame where it belongs.

Last edited by Spaceman Spliff; 04-23-2008 at 08:49 AM.
Spaceman Spliff is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:33 AM
  #62  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spliff View Post
Last time I checked, the DALPA MEC is not authorized to bargain on your behalf.
Space,

DALPA did indeed bargain on our behalf. The changes to scope in the LOA allows NWA wide bodies to continue flying after the merger is closed. Without it NWA wide bodies would have had to stop flying. Also, the LOA contains pay rates for NWA aircraft.

As I've said earlier DALPA did bargain for us. They just didn't go far enough, such as a no furlough clause that pertains to BOTH groups.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:44 PM
  #63  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
As I've said earlier DALPA did bargain for us. They just didn't go far enough, such as a no furlough clause that pertains to BOTH groups.

Carl
No, thats what the JOINT contract negotiations are for. We negotiated an LOA, which is nothing more than an addendum to the current DL contract. I didn't know that our current contract covered any other carriers. I guess we could negotiate a contract which includes you, without any input from you, but then your MEC might feel marginalized.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 08:40 AM
  #64  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
No, thats what the JOINT contract negotiations are for. We negotiated an LOA, which is nothing more than an addendum to the current DL contract. I didn't know that our current contract covered any other carriers. I guess we could negotiate a contract which includes you, without any input from you, but then your MEC might feel marginalized.
Your LOA is a lot more than an addendum to the DALPA contract. Your DALPA LOA changes scope that affects NWA wides bodies, and your LOA affects pay rates for NWA aircraft.

You already did negotiate for us and without any input from us. You just didn't go far enough.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 09:07 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Your LOA is a lot more than an addendum to the DALPA contract. Your DALPA LOA changes scope that affects NWA wides bodies, and your LOA affects pay rates for NWA aircraft.

You already did negotiate for us and without any input from us. You just didn't go far enough.

Carl
Carl I know your smarter than this! DALPA has the power to negotiate its own PWA whose scope sections have an ancillary effect on the operations of companies Delta does business with. It has no power to affect changes to your PWA or alter your companies operations beyond what is contained or omitted from the DALPA scope section.

Ergo, SCOPE EFFECTS DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE PAY AND BENEFITS FOR OTHER PILOT GROUPS.

By your rational DALPA should also negotiate pay and benefits for ASA, SkyWest, and Comair as DALPA's scope sections effect their operations as well.

I believe your logic is clouded by your misplaced frustrations. If you feel your interests aren't being protected than direct your ire at those who represent you and have the power (although so far not the desire) to get you what you want out of this merger. It's happening with or without us.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 09:17 AM
  #66  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Deez340 View Post
Carl I know your smarter than this! DALPA has the power to negotiate its own PWA whose scope sections have an ancillary effect on the operations of companies Delta does business with. It has no power to affect changes to your PWA or alter your companies operations beyond what is contained or omitted from the DALPA scope section.

Ergo, SCOPE EFFECTS DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE PAY AND BENEFITS FOR OTHER PILOT GROUPS.

By your rational DALPA should also negotiate pay and benefits for ASA, SkyWest, and Comair as DALPA's scope sections effect their operations as well.

I believe your logic is clouded by your misplaced frustrations. If you feel your interests aren't being protected than direct your ire at those who represent you and have the power (although so far not the desire) to get you what you want out of this merger. It's happening with or without us.
If that's what you need to rationalize what DALPA has done, so be it. If there is no agreement after the merger closes, capacity reductions are all but certain and any furloughs associated with that will be NWA pilots only. You would not have had the ability to do this without it being decided that Delta would be the acquiring carrier. Once that decision was made, DALPA pressed the advantage and obtained maximum leverage. It was a perfect way to treat an adversary or an enemy. It was no way to treat a soon to be "union brother."

So please, continue on thinking it was done only with the most altruistic of motives. There are dozens of DAL pilots here to continue the echo chamber. There's clearly nothing I can say that will make you see another side.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 10:36 AM
  #67  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
so be it. Carl

Carl, do not ever say SO BE IT to a Delta pilot. Another RA used those 3 words once, and it almost resulted in another burning of Atlanta.

BTW... it's a joke... I'll 'splain it to you over a beer sometime. (you're buyin)

Last edited by tsquare; 04-24-2008 at 12:37 PM.
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 12:30 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Carl,

Can you tell me what the Northwest MEC has ever done to negotiate improvements for the Delta pilots? If you don't like our pay rates, negotiate your own pay rates. Somehow you think the mission of the Delta MEC is to look out for you. Look out for yourself. By the way, tell me which part of our scope affects NWA wide body flying. You throw out this ridiculous premise but have nothing to back it up. If you want parity with our contract, tell your MEC to quit whining in the media and in their council e-mails and start negotiating. You guys are starting to look just a little pathetic.


Rich
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 12:59 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
Carl,

Can you tell me what the Northwest MEC has ever done to negotiate improvements for the Delta pilots? If you don't like our pay rates, negotiate your own pay rates. Somehow you think the mission of the Delta MEC is to look out for you. Look out for yourself. By the way, tell me which part of our scope affects NWA wide body flying. You throw out this ridiculous premise but have nothing to back it up. If you want parity with our contract, tell your MEC to quit whining in the media and in their council e-mails and start negotiating. You guys are starting to look just a little pathetic.


Rich
Carl doesn't represent the majority of NWA pilots (His AVTAR states he is a 747-400 CA). I too believe our MEC screwed the pooch on this one. I for one do not begrudge the DAL pilots for improving their contract. We chose our course, now we must accept that consequences and wait for binding arbitration. Until there is a SLI and one contract we both must fly our contracts.
reddog25 is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 02:14 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25 View Post
Carl doesn't represent the majority of NWA pilots (His AVTAR states he is a 747-400 CA). I too believe our MEC screwed the pooch on this one. I for one do not begrudge the DAL pilots for improving their contract. We chose our course, now we must accept that consequences and wait for binding arbitration. Until there is a SLI and one contract we both must fly our contracts.
Hopefully we can get everything worked out before the LOA goes into effect. I ready to hold hands with the willing, sing Kum Bah Yah, and go make some money.
Deez340 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
19
02-15-2006 06:12 PM
LDmax
Major
0
01-28-2006 12:57 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
08-12-2005 03:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices