NWA's proposed list- YGTBSM!
#31
Rumor on the street is that the new Delta APA is going to consider the shifting of ER flying to some of NWAs bases. Since that flying will need to come from other bases, some will probably be from the JFK base which bids junior and go to Seattle which bids/will bid senior. That being said, the new hires will lose their International widebody flying and probably end up in an 88, just like our new hires who are in DC9s(same type).
Boil it all down and it shows there should not be a 500 pilot staple job.
Boil it all down and it shows there should not be a 500 pilot staple job.
#32
Rumor on the street is that the new Delta APA is going to consider the shifting of ER flying to some of NWAs bases. Since that flying will need to come from other bases, some will probably be from the JFK base which bids junior and go to Seattle which bids/will bid senior. That being said, the new hires will lose their International widebody flying and probably end up in an 88, just like our new hires who are in DC9s(same type).
Boil it all down and it shows there should not be a 500 pilot staple job.
Boil it all down and it shows there should not be a 500 pilot staple job.
Last edited by Hawaii50; 10-22-2008 at 09:42 AM.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
[quote=Superpilot92;483359] NWA pilot list is around 54 years old! Based on numbers alone, not counting growth or status quo, i was set to be over 55% up the list in the next 10-12 years. SO in that period of time i would be a lot higher up the list at that point than a DAL pilot hired around the same time i was. That DAL guy may be on a widebody FO seat now but thats where he will sit for a long time. We have a "crystal ball" or seniority forecaster on the alpa website that shows where you are scheduled to be and when. Mine showed me being 45% on the list in 10-12 years. I was set to be in roughly the top 1/3 of the list for the last 25 years of my career retiring at number 3. A DAL newhire around my hire date isnt looking at that. Not that this is about ME but those are the things that i have personally looked at. Every stage of the NWA list would get reamed with the DAL proposed list so yes it is considered an extreme from our side of the fence. I am young enough to end up fine either way but the majority of the NWA list isnt. quote]
Super, yes a young DAL newhire (2007) is looking at your seniority #'s, just set back by a couple of years. By 2025 they would be looking at being 38%, by 2030 at 16%, by 2035 at .3% etc. So you get your retirements "earlier" we get them a bit "later". RELATIVELY it's pretty much the same...
Super, yes a young DAL newhire (2007) is looking at your seniority #'s, just set back by a couple of years. By 2025 they would be looking at being 38%, by 2030 at 16%, by 2035 at .3% etc. So you get your retirements "earlier" we get them a bit "later". RELATIVELY it's pretty much the same...
#34
newKnow and Superpilot92
We get the message...loud and clear...Super, you've done a wonderful job getting your message out, but honestly, let's get the final list officially published...then we can all hopefully be pi$&ing and moaning about how we got screwed in the merger.
You are right about one thing too...we were and are two solvent, money making (some of the times) strong carriers with strengths that will hopefully magnify once joined.
Safe flying yall.
We get the message...loud and clear...Super, you've done a wonderful job getting your message out, but honestly, let's get the final list officially published...then we can all hopefully be pi$&ing and moaning about how we got screwed in the merger.
You are right about one thing too...we were and are two solvent, money making (some of the times) strong carriers with strengths that will hopefully magnify once joined.
Safe flying yall.
Thanks for listening. I look forward to flying with you guys. Sellcall checks ok.
New K Now
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
The list that was leaked contained confidential personal data. It was never intended for public dissemination. Both sides had agreed to that. The concept of how the list was structured was not a issue to put out. Someone leaked the entire list one day after it was given in electronic form to NWA. There may be more that comes out from this. The person who leaked it should be concerned. I know some pilots have even talked of a law suit.
#37
Super, yes a young DAL newhire (2007) is looking at your seniority #'s, just set back by a couple of years. By 2025 they would be looking at being 38%, by 2030 at 16%, by 2035 at .3% etc. So you get your retirements "earlier" we get them a bit "later". RELATIVELY it's pretty much the same...
In the long run it will all work out I am sure.
#38
Not trying to stoke the flames but I believe it was posted on your MEC forum and the National forum. Someone copied it from the National forum onto the DALPA forum and shortly after it vaporized. There were calls from guys on our site for the DALPA MEC to post your proposed list as retribution (although it wouldn't be that hard to figure out a DOH list). So far, no joy.
#40
What is "overall seniority" when you are going to a NEW airline? It doesn't really matter what your DOH at NWA is, that airline is/will be gone. What matters, imho, is relative position, and I think our proposal, in its final iteration, will protect relative position within a few % points. Remember your relative % at NWA, when put at the new Delta, will be more "valuable" in our heavy intl/widebody fleet. I think you guys just need to get over the NW date of hire, that is gone
Mark
Delta
Mark
Delta
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post