Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Why I'm Voting No

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2017, 05:54 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
squawkoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: ????
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by Inop2 View Post
You misunderstood my comment. Go to another regional with better pay, real medical insurance, etc.

Not that easy either. Flew with a CA that has been at Mesa for 10 years. He showed me his recent rejection letter from Envoy. He didn't interview. I wonder if Envoy is told not to hire other pilots that support their feed to AA?

I personally applied to Endevor. Haven't heard a peep.
squawkoff is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:11 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
squawkoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: ????
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by No Land 3 View Post
Theres a difference between having apps out, and a desire to go anywhere else. You had a response from Omni?, and you made a decision that it wasn't going to be a higher QOL for your situation. Fair enough.
I will suggest however that it is very hard at the regional level to actually know what's better. Regional pilots know a certain lifestyle that they grow comfortable with. When I was at Mesa, I swore I'd never do long haul. Now that I am doing it, I swear I'll never go back to domestic short haul. In fact, the thought of domestic overnights puts a bad taste in my mouth. I had to try it to have formed this opinion. I wanted Spirit, Frontier, Jet Blue, South West when I worked at Mesa. Now, that type of flying seems too close to regional flying, just something I want nothing to do with.
The good news is that any move will provide more for you than anything JO will ever offer.
For me, long haul wouldn't work unless it would be 7 on and then days off. I can't and don't want to be gone from family for two weeks, and some times four weeks at a time. QOL is more important to me than money. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to have the best of both and I'll gladly fight for it. The question I ask myself is how much is two years of seniority worth? I really don't want to start over at the bottom of another seniority list at another regional. Don't mind it with a vertical or even a diagonal move. No matter how you cut it, a regional is a regional. Some are just worse than others.

I'm guessing by your comment that not just having your app out but going to job fairs also. I agree with you if that's what you're getting at. I plan on doing that. I talked to one of our FOs the other day who has been to 5 job fairs trying to get to Spirit. He has yet to receive a call. He is senior to me.

I think we (MESA) are at a real turning point with this TA. If it passes JO will have to bid flying inline with other regionals. His days of a never ending supply of cheap pilots is over. He (JO) just needs to face that fact. By his emails to us and the payscales for FOs in this new TA says he hasn't faced that fact yet. If we don't pass it either he will come back to the table and try to get an expedited vote on improvements or we will stand his ground and possibly lose the additional planes for United. We will never get an industry leading TA. This is a man who prides himself on the title "Worst CEO in America."

WE SHALL SEE!
squawkoff is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:18 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: DFW CRJ CA
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by 20sx View Post
Also, by 13-n-12-b, does this mean getting done a reserve assignment a pilot can be put on ready reserve? I didn't think we could mix assignments like that.
Legally, yes you can.
MagPBS is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:20 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by squawkoff View Post
For me, long haul wouldn't work unless it would be 7 on and then days off. I can't and don't want to be gone from family for two weeks, and some times four weeks at a time. QOL is more important to me than money. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to have the best of both and I'll gladly fight for it. The question I ask myself is how much is two years of seniority worth? I really don't want to start over at the bottom of another seniority list at another regional. Don't mind it with a vertical or even a diagonal move. No matter how you cut it, a regional is a regional. Some are just worse than others.

I'm guessing by your comment that not just having your app out but going to job fairs also. I agree with you if that's what you're getting at. I plan on doing that. I talked to one of our FOs the other day who has been to 5 job fairs trying to get to Spirit. He has yet to receive a call. He is senior to me.

I think we (MESA) are at a real turning point with this TA. If it passes JO will have to bid flying inline with other regionals. His days of a never ending supply of cheap pilots is over. He (JO) just needs to face that fact. By his emails to us and the payscales for FOs in this new TA says he hasn't faced that fact yet. If we don't pass it either he will come back to the table and try to get an expedited vote on improvements or we will stand his ground and possibly lose the additional planes for United. We will never get an industry leading TA. This is a man who prides himself on the title "Worst CEO in America."

WE SHALL SEE!
Is it a lateral move when everything is better?
Two year's seniority seems a minor reason to hold you back.
Do the benefits of that seniority outweigh the benefits of a move, lateral or otherwise?

I was picked up instantly, interviewed on the spot and got a class date 3 weeks later. All it took was face time at a job fair. I've hired close to 100 employees and subcontractors in my business career. The ones who got instant credibility were those who took the time and expense to come see me. Some from Asia to the US. People take notice when you promote yourself in a respectful manner and in person.

What I considered in making a move, lateral or otherwise:
Was QOL going to be better (commute, work rules, corp culture)?
Would the new company be a place I could spend a lengthy time at?
Would it be a better stepping stone to bigger and better?
Was the pay better, immediately or within a year or so?
Was there good reliable insurance available?
Was there a reasonable labor contract in place?
Was the reputation of the company respectable?

I'm 51, so my time is limited. Even with limited time in the industry I found it much more advantageous to make a lateral move than to stay.
I wrote down all the pros and cons of making a move and the results were an eye-opener. Where I was at showed much less opportunity.
Was I more or less likely to get hired from where I was? Less.
Was the QOL going to be better? Much better.
How was the insurance? Best in the industry.
How was the contract, pay, and reputation? Good, Good, Very Good.
It was time to leave.

Don't be stuck anywhere that holds you back or where you are unhappy. Don't make any decision out of fear. Boldly do what is best for you and your family. Maybe staying is your best career move, maybe not.

Good Luck!
WisJudge is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:21 AM
  #105  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Default

Originally Posted by squawkoff View Post
Not that easy either. Flew with a CA that has been at Mesa for 10 years. He showed me his recent rejection letter from Envoy. He didn't interview. I wonder if Envoy is told not to hire other pilots that support their feed to AA?

I personally applied to Endevor. Haven't heard a peep.
A friendly suggestion, put in for a CA slot, if you haven't already. I've seen a few examples of FO's who could of upgraded, but did not, that sends warning flags out. I don't care what anyone says, having 1000 121 TPIC on your resume opens doors, and is in your best interest. Your CA friend that was told no, there's probably more to the story. Personally, I think Air Wisconsin looks nice, if I had to go back to a regional.
ABX, ATI, K4, Southern, Atlas, allegiant, South West, are all hiring, but I agree, it's harder than people think. I was extremely lucky. Heck, in this industry, luck has everything to do with it.
No Land 3 is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:34 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 263
Default

Originally Posted by squawkoff View Post
Not that easy either. Flew with a CA that has been at Mesa for 10 years. He showed me his recent rejection letter from Envoy. He didn't interview. I wonder if Envoy is told not to hire other pilots that support their feed to AA?

I personally applied to Endevor. Haven't heard a peep.
I was at Mesa last year and chose to leave. If I can do it anyone can.. lol. I prepared for the interview at my current regional. Started class 2 weeks later. I was ready for their questions. If I was a 10 year Capt I wouldn't be looking at regionals. Just my opinion.
Inop2 is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:53 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

If the voices in your head are telling you to make a lateral move you should listen. That's your soul telling you it can't take flying at Mesa anymore, if you deny it because you have 2 year or 10 year seniorty, you're just going to be miserable in the long run. Good luck.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 07:03 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by squawkoff View Post
Not that easy either. Flew with a CA that has been at Mesa for 10 years. He showed me his recent rejection letter from Envoy. He didn't interview. I wonder if Envoy is told not to hire other pilots that support their feed to AA?

I personally applied to Endevor. Haven't heard a peep.
As far as envoy I think everyone gets that rejection letter I think because the computer doesn't like something but it's not HR. Just find someone to reccomend you, probably as easy as asking an envoy guy here to talk to hr. They'll interview you right away.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 07-03-2017, 07:00 AM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver View Post
You asked:



I referenced what you asked for. Nothing vague about it. Like I said, there are SEVERAL other iterations of the question that may provide the clarity you're looking for. I didn't link to them all, but I believe Wykoff and Mullen asked them and they are in 2015 IIRC.




I think you're getting confused with terminology. A RAP is NOT part of your FDP. Once the FDP clock has started and then stopped, you cannot go into another FDP or RAP until you have 10 hours of rest. What the FAA is saying in the interpretations is that the company can keep your FDP clock running after your last leg if there is some intention of you flying more, even if they aren't yet aware of it. "We may have some more flying for you later" is acceptable to the FAA for keeping your FDP clock running to the Table B max. It's not a RAP because it's inside of the FDP. It becomes one continuous FDP. Once the company determines it is no longer going to use you and/or the FDP clock runs to its Table B max, you're released to rest.

Now, companies/unions can call this FDP-clock-continuation period whatever they want for compensation/work rule purposes. They may even call it reserve, like you want, but it doesn't change the legal status of that time...it's still FDP time, not a RAP per 117.

Right now, Mesa can keep you on FDP right up until Table B max and then ask you to extend on top of that. There are no additional restrictions because it isn't addressed in the current contract.

In looking at your TA in 13.M.2 it looks like the company would be limited beyond what the FARs require as to how long you can kept in this FDP limbo world without additional assignment. That's why it's important to have this kind of time defined.

FAA definitions:

Short-call reserve means a period of time in which a flightcrew member is assigned to a reserve availability period.

Reserve availability period means a duty period during which a certificate holder requires a flightcrew member on short call reserve to be available to receive an assignment for a flight duty period.

The FAA defines short-call reserve as a pilot assigned to a RAP. If you've already been assigned into a flight duty period, then by definition you are no longer in a RAP and therefore are not on short-call reserve as the FAA defines it. The FAA would probably define any post-flight or in-between-flights-reserve as airport/standby reserve for regulatory purposes. The ready/airport/standby reserve term has other implications in the Mesa contract (namely extra pay), so they have to call it something else in the contract or else it would be confusing.
I was using the RAP +FDP + RAP as an example. My main problem is the company holding on to you like short call reserve. Out of those four options, three make sense. flying , ready, go home. When you read the FDP definition, it mentions airport standby, not short call. When you read these interpretation they do not specifically address my issue, other than you are still good to the company for flying. I am sure everyone has reservations on this portion of the TA. The spirit of the 117 rule is not to go home to be called back. This is what could happen. I am sure the people writing this rule never intended this sort of usage, that's why the idea of airport standby is in the definition. And back to the MAGNEG guys. Because you are on call, on FDP, you are not getting paid, just like short call reserve. There will be no credit for FDP on rainmaker. And stop with the BS of I am getting paid. YEAH YEAH YEAH, my daily credit for my guaranty, this IMO is telling me I am on short call, not FDP. And to make it simple for you, flying = paid, ready = paid, go home = done , FDP ( to be called back with two hour call out, MAYBE) = NO PAY.

Fix this section, ADD a day off, no DOS BS (everything in full swing day one), health insurance like everyone else has, better language and definitions, and just maybe we will have a contract that will attract and maintain an adequate pilot staffing level. This POS is not that contract. If you guys believe this contract attracts and keeps pilots, show me. Lots of FO's voting no, you know why??? no health insurance. Its a big F ing deal. JO has made this mess, everything we do now that does not fix all the problems is a concession. You see this word repeatedly. You union guys, without actually saying it, threaten the pilot group by saying this is the contract or the doors close. If this is really the case, ask yourselves, maybe we sent this out prematurely.
end rant.
YVslave is offline  
Old 07-04-2017, 04:55 AM
  #110  
patience
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver View Post

Right now, Mesa can keep you on FDP right up until Table B max and then ask you to extend on top of that. There are no additional restrictions because it isn't addressed in the current contract.
2-hour 117 extensions are not legal for "added flying." You can only use and accept a 2-hour extension if it's for scheduled flying. Scheduled flying would be the flying already on your schedule when your FDP started or the night before when you entered the rest prior to your known scheduled show time.

Since you can't be extended for additional flying, why on earth would you agree to sit around until you hit the limit on the FDP table? You need at least 1.5 hour buffer to work the shortest possible flight. Why not sit around until 1.5 hours for your max FDP and go home?

Your company or scheduling department may tell you, you can accept 2-hour extensions for additional flying, but remember, you are the one "accepting" the extension on record. If anything happens, you will be hung out to dry for accepting an illegal assignment. We all know, when accepting a 2-hour extension, you've had a long day and chances of "anything happening" increases.
Systemized is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DALFA
Delta
295
05-06-2017 09:04 AM
Overnitefr8
FedEx
5
09-29-2015 04:36 AM
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
170
06-21-2012 10:03 PM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM
DLax85
Cargo
9
08-05-2007 06:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices