Mesa
09-27-2014 | 04:21 PM
#3271
Chief Engineer
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
I get the number of days off part but what about the 90:14 for example.
09-27-2014 | 04:50 PM
#3273
Chief Engineer
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Mesa
Oh ok great thank you!
09-28-2014 | 01:01 AM
#3274
Chief Engineer
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Mesa
Well after looking over the FARs for the R-ATP did anyone use sim time at a 141 school to count towards they're total time to meet the ATP requirements?
09-28-2014 | 01:57 AM
#3275
Chief Engineer
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Mesa
FAR 61.159(a)(6)
09-28-2014 | 11:03 AM
#3276
Banned
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
And for the specifics: (all line are pre-SAP, so final awards may end up different)
CA lines:
Block Days Off
88:44 17
77:47 18
90:33 16
89:51 16
97:11 14
95:58 13
90:09 15
94:44 16
83:57 15
85:04 17
91:40 15
77:55 13
76:29 18
78:35 16
FO lines:
Block Days Off
89:55 16
91:52 16
96:40 16
89:32 16
90:01 14
78:32 17
90:14 16
78:43 13
86:37 14
76:58 16
CA lines:
Block Days Off
88:44 17
77:47 18
90:33 16
89:51 16
97:11 14
95:58 13
90:09 15
94:44 16
83:57 15
85:04 17
91:40 15
77:55 13
76:29 18
78:35 16
FO lines:
Block Days Off
89:55 16
91:52 16
96:40 16
89:32 16
90:01 14
78:32 17
90:14 16
78:43 13
86:37 14
76:58 16
09-28-2014 | 12:28 PM
#3277
Chief Engineer
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Never mind, I think I figured out the answer to my own question. It turns out back in August the FAA changed the sim time credit towards to TT rule to allow sim time during an approved 121, 135, 141, or 142 training course and not just 142 as it used to be.
09-28-2014 | 04:22 PM
#3280
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
That depends entirely on where you are in the system. Since the EJET flying is only just getting started, it's very hard to say for that aircraft. I would have to let the CRJ folks chime in on that flying.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
