Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa E-jet?

Old 06-20-2013 | 03:41 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer
What the heck does that have to do with anything? Is there anyone here that would recommend someone go to Mesa over SkyWest?

And for the record, I've had three interviews in the last month. I have a class date with Commutair and I'm waiting to hear from SKW.
Music to my eyes!!! That means my company saw through you and said no thanks. Good luck at commutair.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 03:53 PM
  #12  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

If Mesa gets these 30 ships then what’s UA going to use as leverage during the negotiations to park 165 50-seaters that are under guaranteed contracts that extend past the 1/1/2016 deadline. Mesa has none to offer up but XJT has over 260. Oh well IDK, I thought anyone who gets these E-175s would remove their 50-seaters at a 2:1 ratio but SkyWest signed a contract that parks none. Although there is an understanding that the contracts on 40 of our 50-seaters will not be renewed when they expire sometime over the next 2 years. But that’s only 40………..

Currently there are 585 total UAX ships + the 40 E-175s SkyWest is getting + the 30 E-175 UA has an RFP out on – the 40 CR2s SkyWest will be removing = 615 UAX ships. By 1/1/2016 that number must be reduced not to exceed 450. 615 UAX ships – 450 = 165 that must be removed.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 04:09 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by smackahoCEO
Music to my eyes!!! That means my company saw through you and said no thanks. Good luck at commutair.
Ok, whatever.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 05:49 PM
  #14  
spuzzyair
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Makes sense. Give the worst performer, operationally speaking, the new flying.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 08:34 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

If Mesa gets these 30 ships then what’s UA going to use as leverage during the negotiations to park 165 50-seaters that are under guaranteed contracts that extend past the 1/1/2016 deadline. Mesa has none to offer up but XJT has over 260. Oh well IDK, I thought anyone who gets these E-175s would remove their 50-seaters at a 2:1 ratio but SkyWest signed a contract that parks none. Although there is an understanding that the contracts on 40 of our 50-seaters will not be renewed when they expire sometime over the next 2 years. But that’s only 40………..

Currently there are 585 total UAX ships + the 40 E-175s SkyWest is getting + the 30 E-175 UA has an RFP out on – the 40 CR2s SkyWest will be removing = 615 UAX ships. By 1/1/2016 that number must be reduced not to exceed 450. 615 UAX ships – 450 = 165 that must be removed.
They only need to reduce the 50 seat jets IF they exceed 153 76 seat jets. And that requires them to purchase new SNB aircraft. With that said, they don't need leverage to get rid of ALL of XJT's 50 seat jets. They will automatically come off as leases expire.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 09:13 PM
  #16  
DSRoss996's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by spuzzyair
Makes sense. Give the worst performer, operationally speaking, the new flying.
I'm pretty sure United's worst operational performer is Express Jet. Nice try though.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 09:31 PM
  #17  
Salukipilot4590's Avatar
Scary...Scary...
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 11
From: Rollin' Down tha 405
Default

What did Tall guy do?

Why am I not in on this?
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 10:19 PM
  #18  
EatMyPropwash's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590
What did Tall guy do?

Why am I not in on this?
He's going to CommutAir as of now, and someone is giving him a stiff upper lip e-style.
Reply
Old 06-20-2013 | 10:56 PM
  #19  
FerrisBluer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Bob's Big Boy Front Office Staffer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spuzzyair
Makes sense. Give the worst performer, operationally speaking, the new flying.

I'm pretty sure United's worst operational performer is Express Jet. Nice try though.
Mesa, worst performer??? hmmmm site your source scuzzyair. Oh wait, all you have is hear say from countless entitled "carbon copy" regional jet pilots.

perhaps you meant "contractually" instead of "operationally?" I'm not gonna defend it totally because it is what it is. Which is crap, but united seems to like it and so say the numbers.
Reply
Old 06-21-2013 | 10:10 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Airlinewisdom
It might be wise to consider if a company will maybe be around in 10 or 20 years. I knew a guy who fly for Ransome, Pan Am Express, TWA, Pam Am then ATA and finally a B747 Capt at World. He ended up laid of a World at age 61 with 24,000 hours. Finally accepted a job at a big regional to finish his career out of EWR.
Sounds like standard career progression.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
32LTangoTen
Regional
3
11-19-2011 09:25 PM
flycrj200
Regional
14
12-06-2008 10:23 AM
Lbell911
Regional
13
12-28-2007 08:21 AM
RockBottom
Regional
18
09-17-2006 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices