Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Separate from USAF or stay til 20? >

Separate from USAF or stay til 20?

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Separate from USAF or stay til 20?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2017, 10:33 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Which is why most airlines no longer have pensions, instead putting money in 401k accounts. In the pilots' names.

So what is your point exactly?

Also note continual attempts to reduce mil retiree pensions and healthcare
Sputnik is offline  
Old 05-31-2017, 10:44 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Originally Posted by BFMthisA10 View Post
Run the numbers including actuarial tables. SBP is in the same ballpark as whole life in terms of crap investments. Like redux or anything First Command: looks good on paper, ...and thats about it.
Im not sure its quite so black and white, but love to see your numbers.

My take was it depended on individual risk tolerance. If I die tomorrow and my wife lives to expected age, huge win. Other scenarios, not quite such a win.

My CFP father in law ran the numbers for what it would cost to purchase an equivalent annuity and concluded that it was an extremely good deal. If you are not an annuity fan (quite reasonable position) then this is a pointless observation.

I really think it comes down to individual tolerance, no one size fits all answer. Though I agree whole life sucks.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 05-31-2017, 11:00 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 291
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
I really think it comes down to individual tolerance, no one size fits all answer. Though I agree whole life sucks.
That's really what it comes down to, yes. From another angle, consider that actuarial tables typically show a retiring military officer outliving their spouse by a year or two. Would that change your calculus.
Another fun exercise: take half of the calculated SBP payment and shop around for a term policy. Then take the other half and invest. What's the size of the egg at the end of the term policy? Probably enough to float it's own annuity structure from there on out.
Exercise two: if the military spouse is a working professional, then its a no brainer. SBP made sense for the homemaker, but that premium invested for just 10 years is enough to crush the original return. Assuming you live that long and you two can afford it.
BFMthisA10 is offline  
Old 05-31-2017, 12:40 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

I guess I consider it insurance in case I die soon after retiring.

An emotional way of looking at it is that I don't want my pension to die with me, I want to leave it to my family. Not very logical, but there you go.

I'm in the third year of retirement, which means I can cancel it. Need to run the numbers again.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 05-31-2017, 12:47 PM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
I guess I consider it insurance in case I die soon after retiring.



An emotional way of looking at it is that I don't want my pension to die with me, I want to leave it to my family. Not very logical, but there you go.



I'm in the third year of retirement, which means I can cancel it. Need to run the numbers again.


Another option is to get SBP for your kids only. Relatively cheap ($13/month with a 2 year old as my youngest) and it keeps the pension for the family until the youngest is 21ish or there abouts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cliffnd is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 06:52 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,214
Default

Early 1990's. Flying with a 17 yr separated UASF guy. Aggressor, F-16 Ops O, FWS, etc, etc, up for squadron commander. He bailed. Just coming off a Hdq tour. He was assigned by TAC commander (Creech?) to do a study and show guys why they'd be better off staying in the USAF vs separating. Doing the study it hit him like a ton of bricks...as a 17 yr O-5 (?) he was better off leaving. The pay off was greater then 17 yrs. He left. Creech has was stunned.

IDK what today's break even point is but it's probably closer to 20 yrs than 10 yrs.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 10:38 AM
  #57  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback View Post
Early 1990's. Flying with a 17 yr separated UASF guy. Aggressor, F-16 Ops O, FWS, etc, etc, up for squadron commander. He bailed. Just coming off a Hdq tour. He was assigned by TAC commander (Creech?) to do a study and show guys why they'd be better off staying in the USAF vs separating. Doing the study it hit him like a ton of bricks...as a 17 yr O-5 (?) he was better off leaving. The pay off was greater then 17 yrs. He left. Creech has was stunned.

IDK what today's break even point is but it's probably closer to 20 yrs than 10 yrs.
The copy-of-a-copy spreadsheet that made its way around my fighter squadron in '99 showed that a guy that separated at 17 years and went to the majors out-earned the guy who stayed 3 more years to get a retirement to the tune of over $1 mil in lifetime earnings.

Of course, that spreadsheet didn't take 9/11, age 65, mergers, or the Recession into consideration.

I wonder what those "real" income numbers look like for those guys who left then.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 10:51 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Lurchi View Post
Stay till 20 with AF or go airlines now? Always an interesting question because the answer reveals what you value. Airline pilots talk in terms of money (seniority and pay) and time off with the goal to work as little as possible for as much pay as possible. In other words the satisfaction of this job is not the job itself but what it allows you to do. Money isn't everything, how many airline pilots are making plenty and still unhappy? I know many AF pilots now flying for the airlines that talk with fondness about their active duty days and what might have been if they stayed in. So I think the decision comes down to what really matters to you...if you value achievement and job satisfaction then maybe you should stay military for now if you enjoy it until you can retire. If you just want to make money and have time to spend it but don't really care about achieving anything then maybe you should jump to airlines. It really comes down to what you value and what you want to do with the finite number of heart beats you will have before you keel over. Btw I'm a 25 yr vet that is extremely content to have completed a career in the AF and now have the opportunity to retire to the airlines with nothing left to prove or accomplish...my answer reveals what I value.
I don't know anyone who wants to stay in, guard/reserve or active duty. Nor do I know anyone in the airlines who wishes that they would have stayed in -- only a rare Captain here or there. (they have no idea what it has become).

I value working in an organization that respects me and pays me for my professional skills and judgement.

I don't value working in an organization where we spend thousands of man hours on EPRs/OPRs only to see them given maybe a 30 second quick glance during the promotion hustle. Or you didn't get promoted because the writer sucked or you didn't get that new buzzword. Or where someone who isn't even rated or done anything operational held in a higher regard than someone who is out there operationally getting the job done while in extreme hazardous situations. And you wonder why I got out?

I also don't value working for an organization which treats me, a 20+ year officer and 40-year old, the same as an 18-year old E-1.

I value working for an organization where I can pick up the phone or satcom, call the dispatcher, voice concerns over an issue and work with him/her to alleviate the offending condition. Most of the time the dispatchers are welcome to hear what we found.

I don't value flying for an organization where there's regulations upon regulations, government books after government books, supplements after supplements. Many of them conflict with one another. Yet, the aircraft commander is responsible for everything and if goes wrong, the unit commander throws you under the bus.

More so, I don't value an organization that creates silly ORM worksheets, where if we were honest on the score, would mean at least moderate or high for nearly everything we do. Then when you do the right thing and up channel the information, you're overruled by someone in the chain and have the ORM artificially reduced and/or told to go shut up and color.

I value working for an organization which reduces the paperwork as much as possible and has an easy to use expense/trip reporting system. This way we can focus on rest or the mission.

I don't value working for an organization where the entire orders process, pre-travel DTS voucher, post-travel DTS voucher, and then actually getting paid is so cumbersome and out date that I end up wasting most of my time on it. Also, it is insulting when the USAF asks me to check my accounts to ensure I was paid, which I was, because their systems still show my vouchers to be outstanding. Incompetence.

I value my time off with family and friends. This is why I bailed.

I value what I do outside of the USAF, knowing my efforts mean the difference between someone getting home to see their kids wedding, or perhaps a last moment goodbye before a loved one passes, or flying to locations where critical cancer drugs with incredibly short half-lives are shipped to their needy patients.

I don't value an organization that has been dropping bombs on hajis for more than 20 damn years. What the heck are we doing over there? It isn't working. Plus our country can't afford it.

I value an organization which consistently tries to do things better and for less.

I don't value an organization where if you don't use it, you lose it. And being called in back to work late on September 30th because we just received $65,000 into our account and we need to blow it. I don't see how that helps the mission or the tax payers. I also don't value an organization where when that rare commander speaks up and says whats on everyones' mind, ends up getting replaced and fired.

You're right, the decision to stay or go comes down to what you value.

The USAF enterprise is broken on so many levels. I am amazed we can get anything done today.

I suggest firing and replacing many USAF Generals with a few Army, Navy, and USMC Generals -- similar to the tv show Wife Swap.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 10:53 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,214
Default

This guy was going to become a points only reservist, at a minimum, to get his 20 yrs.

After years of chasing his career he enjoyed drinking beer and having sand between his toes while he was 'working' at the beach.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 05:57 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 595
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy

I suggest firing and replacing many USAF Generals with a few Army, Navy, and USMC Generals -- similar to the tv show Wife Swap.
With all due respect to an epic rant (Job Well Done or BZ in Squidward parlance).....
You absolutely, positively DO NOT want the senior Army leadership for a CO Swap.
Some of the issues you decry now were prevalent in the Active Army in the late 90's....
In one week, you'd be wearing two piece flight suits while riding in the back of a clapped out Hummer wearing your K-Pot (in case you fall out) with a mean cammo face paint design on your way to the field to practice putting up GP Medium tents and conducting Mopp 4 drills in a 5 meter interval chow line.
Hellfire engagement TTP's?...BLAH!, We need to be 'Proficient' in our field tasks on the ppt slides!
I recently read some current Active guys' posts and they are the exact same issues people like me brought up in almost 2 decades ago. There's a reason the RW to regional path is gonna take a bite out of the force. I asked some senior folks if they're adjusting for it.... Huh?! What do you mean?
My opinion is that those who CAN make a difference can't comprehend why they should regardless of how many facts you present and wouldn't risk their perch after eating the company stew for so many years.
THE Best CDR I ever had (USMA grad) got it and tried to make a change supported by data, experience and persuation at a PME course. He is a smart dude.... The Army's schools house MGB jumped him.

To me, it was like trying to explain the color blue to a blind man.
Sad to hear y'all are in the same boat.
Hobbit64 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
21
03-04-2012 09:50 AM
Bri85
Pilot Health
12
01-03-2008 08:35 AM
cruiseclimb
Major
39
12-22-2006 11:48 AM
cruiseclimb
Regional
0
12-15-2006 07:09 AM
legendskid_44
Corporate
20
09-25-2006 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices